In a recent interview with Thinking Crypto, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce spoke candidly about the Ripple lawsuit and her opposition to the case. The SEC’s case against Ripple Labs, filed in December 2020, accused the company of offering unregistered securities through the sale of XRP tokens.
This lawsuit became a defining moment for the digital asset industry and led to extensive debates over how cryptocurrency and blockchain technology should be regulated.
Peirce, who has long advocated for a more balanced and transparent regulatory approach, emphasized that she did not support the SEC’s decision to bring the case. “I cannot speak for the agency’s full reasoning,” she explained, adding that her stance was in stark contrast to the enforcement-driven approach that characterized much of the SEC’s strategy at the time.
The lawsuit aimed to address what the SEC saw as violations of securities laws, but Peirce’s discomfort with such enforcement actions has been a consistent theme throughout her tenure.
Peirce described the SEC’s decision to pursue Ripple as part of a broader enforcement-driven approach that she felt was misguided. According to her, this approach was not the best way to foster growth and innovation within the crypto space.
She believes that the SEC should have taken a more constructive role by helping companies understand and navigate the regulatory landscape, rather than resorting to litigation.
As Peirce sees it, the SEC could have worked alongside the digital asset industry to create clearer guidelines and standards that would have fostered better disclosures from companies. This would have been a more effective way to encourage innovation while ensuring compliance with relevant laws. “We could have had more constructive conversations to help projects understand the regulatory framework,” Peirce said.
In July 2023, Judge Analisa Torres delivered a key ruling in the Ripple case, which found that XRP is not a security when traded on secondary markets. However, the court also determined that certain sales of XRP by Ripple were subject to securities laws. This decision added nuance to the legal landscape for digital assets, particularly regarding the distinction between a token and a transaction.
Peirce highlighted the importance of the ruling, stating that it reinforced the notion that a token itself is not inherently a security. “It’s the way the token is sold and the expectations surrounding its sale that determine its legal status,” Peirce explained. This ruling has set a precedent that emphasizes the transaction structure over the asset itself, marking a shift in how digital assets may be regulated in the future.
The ruling in the Ripple case has forced both the SEC and Congress to reconsider their approach to digital asset regulation. Peirce noted that the decision will have a lasting impact on how digital asset frameworks are developed in the future. With discussions about new legislative measures such as the Clarity Act, she believes that this case will help shape more comprehensive regulations for the cryptocurrency market.
Peirce emphasized that the Ripple case’s ruling should prompt lawmakers and regulators to think more carefully about how digital assets should be treated under U.S. securities laws. The SEC, according to Peirce, should not rely solely on enforcement actions but should take a proactive role in setting clearer rules for digital assets.
The post SEC’s Peirce Reveals She Did Not Support the Ripple Lawsuit Decision appeared first on CoinCentral.


![[Tambay] Tres niños na bagitos](https://www.rappler.com/tachyon/2026/01/TL-TRES-NINOS-NA-BAGITOS-JAN-17-2026.jpg)