Controversy erupts as index provider plans to remove crypto treasury companies, potentially triggering billions in outflowsControversy erupts as index provider plans to remove crypto treasury companies, potentially triggering billions in outflows

Bitcoin Community Calls for JP Morgan Boycott Over MSCI Index Exclusion Plans

Bitcoin Community Calls for JP Morgan Boycott Over MSCI Index Exclusion Plans

Bitcoin supporters and Strategy shareholders are mounting a boycott campaign against JP Morgan after the investment bank highlighted plans by index provider MSCI to exclude crypto treasury companies from major market indexes starting January 2026.

The backlash intensified over the weekend after JP Morgan flagged the potential exclusion in a research note. MSCI, a global provider of financial market indices that drives billions in institutional investments, reportedly plans to remove companies with more than 50% of their balance sheets in cryptocurrency from its indexes.

The proposed policy change could force funds and asset managers tracking MSCI indexes to automatically sell shares of affected companies, including Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin. JP Morgan estimates potential outflows could reach $2.8 billion for Strategy alone, rising to $8.8 billion if additional index providers follow suit.

Simply Bitcoin reported on X that JP Morgan dumped 25% of its MSTR position right before MSCI announced Bitcoin companies can’t enter major indexes.

Real estate investor and Bitcoin advocate Grant Cardone claimed he withdrew $20 million from JP Morgan Chase, vowing to file a lawsuit against the firm over credit card issues. Bitcoin advocate Max Keiser urged supporters to close JP Morgan accounts and invest in Strategy and Bitcoin, with unconfirmed reports circulating that JP Morgan holds a short position in MSTR.

Michael Saylor, executive chairman and founder of Strategy, defended his company's classification, arguing it is "not a fund, a trust, or a holding firm but a Bitcoin-backed structured finance company." Saylor explained that "funds and trusts simply hold onto assets. Holding companies keep investments. We create, design, issue, and run our operations."

The controversy carries significant implications for crypto treasury companies. Strategy was added to the Nasdaq 100 in December 2024, enabling the company to benefit from passive capital flows from funds tracking the index. Exclusion from MSCI indexes could eliminate similar benefits and trigger automated sell-offs.

MSCI is one of the world's most influential index providers, with inclusion often attracting passive investment from mutual funds, ETFs, and pension funds. Exclusion can trigger reduced liquidity and selling pressure as index-tracking funds rebalance portfolios.

Forced selling by crypto treasury companies reacting to index exclusions could pressure digital asset prices. Companies facing exclusion would need to either reduce crypto holdings below 50% of balance sheets to maintain index status or accept loss of passive capital flows from institutional investors.

The boycott movement has gained traction on social media, with supporters calling for account closures and fund withdrawals. The campaign coincides with renewed scrutiny of JP Morgan following Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden's analysis of the bank's reporting on Jeffrey Epstein's suspicious transactions, though the two issues are unrelated.

The proposed MSCI policy change is scheduled for implementation in January 2026, giving affected companies over a year to adjust strategies.

➢ Stay ahead of the curve. Join Blockhead on Telegram today for all the latest in crypto.
+ Follow Blockhead on Google News
Market Opportunity
Index Cooperative Logo
Index Cooperative Price(INDEX)
$0.4886
$0.4886$0.4886
-0.16%
USD
Index Cooperative (INDEX) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Digitap Raises Over $4M: A Comparison with DeepSnitch AI

Digitap Raises Over $4M: A Comparison with DeepSnitch AI

Both DeepSnitch AI and Digitap ($TAP) have been highlighted within some crypto communities for their distinct approaches. Although the two coins take a very different
Share
Crypto Ninjas2026/01/18 23:42
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15