Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has raised serious concerns about X’s newly launched location-tagging feature, warning that sophisticated actors willEthereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has raised serious concerns about X’s newly launched location-tagging feature, warning that sophisticated actors will

Vitalik Buterin Warns X’s Location Feature Creates ‘Easy to Fake’ Security Risk

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has raised serious concerns about X’s newly launched location-tagging feature, warning that sophisticated actors will easily circumvent the system while legitimate users face privacy risks.

The feature, which displays the country or region where accounts are based, rolled out globally on November 22 through the platform’s “About This Account” section, accessible by tapping the signup date on user profiles.

Buterin’s critique centers on the feature’s vulnerability to manipulation, predicting that within six months, foreign political troll accounts will successfully spoof their locations to appear as though they operate from the United States or the United Kingdom.

He argued that while obtaining fake locations for a million accounts might prove moderately difficult, creating a single account with a fraudulent location and growing it to a million followers would be straightforward through methods such as renting passports, phone numbers, and IP addresses.

Privacy Concerns Overshadow Security Benefits

The location feature has sparked immediate backlash from the crypto community, with figures like Uniswap founder Hayden Adams calling it “psychotic” and questioning its mandatory nature.

Adams distinguished between voluntary and compulsory information sharing, stating, “opt-in doxxing is fine, mandatory doxxing is psychotic.”

The feature’s implementation appears particularly concerning for crypto users, given the industry’s history of targeted attacks and kidnappings related to digital asset holdings.

Buterin later clarified his position following community feedback, acknowledging that revealing location data without consent or an opt-out option violates user privacy.

There are some people for whom even a few bits of leakage are risky, and they should not have their privacy retroactively rugpulled with no recourse,” he wrote.

While X product director Nikita Bier announced privacy toggles for users in countries where speech carries penalties, critics argue this doesn’t address the fundamental privacy invasion for the broader user base.

The controversy appears particularly stark when contrasted with platform owner Elon Musk’s March 2022 statement promising that X would “do whatever it takes to protect the rights of users to remain anonymous, as they would otherwise face persecution from employers or risk of physical harm.

That commitment came when the platform updated its privacy policy to ban publishing the real names of people behind anonymous accounts.

Industry Experts Debate Long-Term Implications

Finance professor Maxim Mironov from IE Business School suggested the feature could function similarly to spam prevention mechanisms, arguing that introducing extra costs for faking country information would reduce bot activity.

However, Buterin countered that the current system requires individual users to manually check each account’s location, negating any mass-scale verification benefits and proving useful only for high-profile accounts worth explicitly investigating.

Cryptoanalyst Nic Carter offered a contrasting perspective, framing the location disclosure as recognition that unrestricted access to Western communication infrastructure has enabled widespread abuse.

Why should we continue to grant scammers direct access to our phones, inboxes, and DMs?” Carter wrote, comparing the approach to China’s long-standing restrictions on foreign participation in domestic platforms.

He characterized the human cost of open access as “astronomical,” citing seniors’ inability to use the internet safely and the constant SIM-farm spam.

Several users highlighted practical workarounds and concerns about the feature’s implementation.

Web3 attorney Langerius instructed followers to disable country visibility through settings or switch from country-level to region-level display.

Developer Mayowa warned the feature could encourage discrimination against users from certain regions, noting that “innocent users will be abused or thrown under the bus simply because of where they’re chatting from.

Tech investor Jason Calacanis quipped, “Long VPN stocks,” suggesting virtual private networks would see increased adoption as users seek to mask their true locations.

The feature represents X’s stated effort to secure what it calls the “global town square,” with Bier promising additional authenticity verification methods in development.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Digitap Raises Over $4M: A Comparison with DeepSnitch AI

Digitap Raises Over $4M: A Comparison with DeepSnitch AI

Both DeepSnitch AI and Digitap ($TAP) have been highlighted within some crypto communities for their distinct approaches. Although the two coins take a very different
Share
Crypto Ninjas2026/01/18 23:42
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

Exploring how the costs of a pandemic can lead to a self-enforcing lockdown in a networked economy, analyzing the resulting changes in network structure and the existence of stable equilibria.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:00