Key Takeaways: Institutional crypto discussions are shifting toward Bitcoin’s long-term encryption durability rather than short-term price. Veteran users seeking stronger […] The post Bitcoin Still Worth Holding, But Not Forever If Quantum Wins: VanEck appeared first on Coindoo.Key Takeaways: Institutional crypto discussions are shifting toward Bitcoin’s long-term encryption durability rather than short-term price. Veteran users seeking stronger […] The post Bitcoin Still Worth Holding, But Not Forever If Quantum Wins: VanEck appeared first on Coindoo.

Bitcoin Still Worth Holding, But Not Forever If Quantum Wins: VanEck

2025/11/24 20:33
Key Takeaways:
  • Institutional crypto discussions are shifting toward Bitcoin’s long-term encryption durability rather than short-term price.
  • Veteran users seeking stronger privacy have sparked massive capital rotation into Zcash.
  • VanEck expects Bitcoin’s bearish phase to be priced in ahead of 2026 but still views BTC as a valid long-term allocation — unless quantum risk ever breaks the thesis.

Institutional crypto adoption has mostly been fueled by ETFs, halving cycles, and macro liquidity — but an entirely different topic is quietly reshaping the way large money looks at Bitcoin: whether the network can still rely on its current cryptography decades from now.

The idea didn’t originate from skeptics. It has been surfacing inside Bitcoin’s own oldest circles, and the latest to say it out loud is VanEck CEO Jan van Eck, who suggested that the community is already thinking beyond bull markets and price charts and questioning its technical future.

Van Eck didn’t frame Bitcoin as a short-term trade. Instead, he positioned it as a long-term thesis that remains intact until proven broken. He emphasized that his firm — one of the world’s largest managers of Bitcoin-linked financial products — would not hesitate to abandon its position if quantum breakthroughs ever invalidate Bitcoin’s encryption model.

Privacy Is Quietly Driving Capital Rotation

A surprising shift is happening beneath the surface of the crypto market. While Bitcoin continues to dominate headlines, a substantial number of veteran users have increasingly turned their attention toward privacy-centric assets, looking for transactional anonymity that Bitcoin does not inherently provide.

That shift has transformed Zcash into one of the most explosive performers of the year. The token has risen by more than 1,300% in three months, largely because demand for private transfers has resurged rather than because of speculative narratives. The move has become so visible that it is forcing analysts to reconsider how much of Bitcoin’s original community values censorship resistance versus price exposure.

Quantum Threat: Same Technology, Two Completely Opposite Narratives

Cybersecurity experts have conflicting assessments on whether quantum computers matter today. Some, including cypherpunk Adam Back, argue that Bitcoin has multiple decades before quantum machines pose meaningful risk. Others believe the question is not urgency, but inevitability — and that preparation must begin before breakthroughs occur, not after.

READ MORE:

Bitcoin Attempts Recovery After Brutal Sell-Off as Analysts Warn of Much Deeper Risk

Van Eck didn’t endorse either timeframe. His message was simpler: investors need to understand that Bitcoin depends on cryptography, and cryptography itself evolves. The thesis is strong today, but it is not carved in stone.

Meanwhile, the Market Is Already Pricing in a Different Concern

While institutional conversations shift toward the far future, the market continues to react to something far more immediate: Bitcoin’s four-year cycle. VanEck’s internal research points to a bearish stretch being deliberately pre-positioned ahead of 2026, consistent with the pattern of past negative cycle years.

Bitcoin has already fallen more than 30% from its peak earlier in October, bottoming near $82,000 before rebounding briefly toward $88,000. Van Eck believes investors who accumulate during down phases have historically outperformed those who chase rallies at the top — but he also acknowledges that this cycle is behaving differently, with the correction so far appearing milder than previous ones.

Why This Debate Matters Now

For many investors, Bitcoin has been valued for its past performance. But the conversation is changing. The next decade may not be defined by how high Bitcoin goes, but whether the architecture that protects it remains unbreakable.

If quantum computing turns out to be decades away, Bitcoin has time to evolve. If not, the protocol may eventually need to reinvent itself to survive.

Either way, van Eck’s message was clear: ignoring the question is no longer an option.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post Bitcoin Still Worth Holding, But Not Forever If Quantum Wins: VanEck appeared first on Coindoo.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0006072
$0.0006072$0.0006072
+0.18%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30