XRP’s decline in recent weeks has led to questions among holders who worry that Ripple may be pushed into selling more of its XRP reserves to maintain operations. This concern resurfaced as discussions around Ripple’s shifting business model gained traction, especially with the company’s RLUSD stablecoin.  The conversation was held on the social media platform X, where Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, stepped in to address whether a lower XRP price could force Ripple into additional token sales. Ripple CTO Says Falling Prices Do Not Increase Selling Pressure Schwartz’s comment came as a response after a user argued that Ripple might gradually shift its priorities away from XRP because RLUSD is tied directly to fiat reserves, unlike the cryptocurrency. The user’s argument is that this difference could leave Ripple less exposed to XRP’s price movements and more inclined to depend on the stablecoin during uncertain market periods. Related Reading: Analyst Shares Why He’s Not Worried About XRP Price – ‘The Road To Valhala This could create a scenario in which Ripple becomes insulated from XRP’s market swings, potentially making it less motivated to support the token if its price declines. Schwartz pushed back strongly against that line of reasoning. He made it clear that the assumption that falling prices increase the company’s need to offload XRP is misguided. He pointed out that Ripple’s broader revenue structure now allows the company to operate without relying on market conditions to stay afloat.  In his view, new income channels lessen the chances that Ripple would ever face a situation where it must sell XRP to sustain operations. Ripple Needs To Diversify Part of the tension around potential XRP sales comes from Ripple’s business model. The company has always earned a sizable portion of its income from controlled XRP sales, even though it also offered enterprise products such as cross-border payment solutions through RippleNet.  However, public reports from previous years showed that these software licensing fees and enterprise offerings brought in smaller revenue compared to the revenue gained through XRP sales. This is why there have been concerns that heavy selling during market dips could weigh on XRP’s price. Related Reading: Here’s The Resistance Zone Keeping The Dogecoin Price From Rallying An important part of Ripple’s token management is the escrow program, which unlocks 1 billion XRP tokens in scheduled monthly releases. This mechanism was originally designed to bring predictability to XRP’s circulating supply and prevent sudden large inflows into the market.  Ripple typically returns most of the unlocked XRP (70% to 80%) back into escrow each month, releasing only a small amount for operational purposes. This structure limits the potential impact Ripple can have on market liquidity at any given time. However, the company currently depends much on XRP sales, and there is a pressing need to look for more sources of income. Schwartz’s comments show that Ripple is not positioned in a way that requires dumping XRP, even as the token trades near recent lows. Featured image created with Pxfuel, chart from Tradingview.comXRP’s decline in recent weeks has led to questions among holders who worry that Ripple may be pushed into selling more of its XRP reserves to maintain operations. This concern resurfaced as discussions around Ripple’s shifting business model gained traction, especially with the company’s RLUSD stablecoin.  The conversation was held on the social media platform X, where Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, stepped in to address whether a lower XRP price could force Ripple into additional token sales. Ripple CTO Says Falling Prices Do Not Increase Selling Pressure Schwartz’s comment came as a response after a user argued that Ripple might gradually shift its priorities away from XRP because RLUSD is tied directly to fiat reserves, unlike the cryptocurrency. The user’s argument is that this difference could leave Ripple less exposed to XRP’s price movements and more inclined to depend on the stablecoin during uncertain market periods. Related Reading: Analyst Shares Why He’s Not Worried About XRP Price – ‘The Road To Valhala This could create a scenario in which Ripple becomes insulated from XRP’s market swings, potentially making it less motivated to support the token if its price declines. Schwartz pushed back strongly against that line of reasoning. He made it clear that the assumption that falling prices increase the company’s need to offload XRP is misguided. He pointed out that Ripple’s broader revenue structure now allows the company to operate without relying on market conditions to stay afloat.  In his view, new income channels lessen the chances that Ripple would ever face a situation where it must sell XRP to sustain operations. Ripple Needs To Diversify Part of the tension around potential XRP sales comes from Ripple’s business model. The company has always earned a sizable portion of its income from controlled XRP sales, even though it also offered enterprise products such as cross-border payment solutions through RippleNet.  However, public reports from previous years showed that these software licensing fees and enterprise offerings brought in smaller revenue compared to the revenue gained through XRP sales. This is why there have been concerns that heavy selling during market dips could weigh on XRP’s price. Related Reading: Here’s The Resistance Zone Keeping The Dogecoin Price From Rallying An important part of Ripple’s token management is the escrow program, which unlocks 1 billion XRP tokens in scheduled monthly releases. This mechanism was originally designed to bring predictability to XRP’s circulating supply and prevent sudden large inflows into the market.  Ripple typically returns most of the unlocked XRP (70% to 80%) back into escrow each month, releasing only a small amount for operational purposes. This structure limits the potential impact Ripple can have on market liquidity at any given time. However, the company currently depends much on XRP sales, and there is a pressing need to look for more sources of income. Schwartz’s comments show that Ripple is not positioned in a way that requires dumping XRP, even as the token trades near recent lows. Featured image created with Pxfuel, chart from Tradingview.com

Will The Low XRP Price Force Ripple To Dump Its Holdings? Exec Answers Community

2025/11/24 20:30

XRP’s decline in recent weeks has led to questions among holders who worry that Ripple may be pushed into selling more of its XRP reserves to maintain operations. This concern resurfaced as discussions around Ripple’s shifting business model gained traction, especially with the company’s RLUSD stablecoin. 

The conversation was held on the social media platform X, where Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, stepped in to address whether a lower XRP price could force Ripple into additional token sales.

Ripple CTO Says Falling Prices Do Not Increase Selling Pressure

Schwartz’s comment came as a response after a user argued that Ripple might gradually shift its priorities away from XRP because RLUSD is tied directly to fiat reserves, unlike the cryptocurrency. The user’s argument is that this difference could leave Ripple less exposed to XRP’s price movements and more inclined to depend on the stablecoin during uncertain market periods.

This could create a scenario in which Ripple becomes insulated from XRP’s market swings, potentially making it less motivated to support the token if its price declines.

Schwartz pushed back strongly against that line of reasoning. He made it clear that the assumption that falling prices increase the company’s need to offload XRP is misguided. He pointed out that Ripple’s broader revenue structure now allows the company to operate without relying on market conditions to stay afloat. 

In his view, new income channels lessen the chances that Ripple would ever face a situation where it must sell XRP to sustain operations.

Ripple Needs To Diversify

Part of the tension around potential XRP sales comes from Ripple’s business model. The company has always earned a sizable portion of its income from controlled XRP sales, even though it also offered enterprise products such as cross-border payment solutions through RippleNet. 

However, public reports from previous years showed that these software licensing fees and enterprise offerings brought in smaller revenue compared to the revenue gained through XRP sales. This is why there have been concerns that heavy selling during market dips could weigh on XRP’s price.

An important part of Ripple’s token management is the escrow program, which unlocks 1 billion XRP tokens in scheduled monthly releases. This mechanism was originally designed to bring predictability to XRP’s circulating supply and prevent sudden large inflows into the market. 

Ripple typically returns most of the unlocked XRP (70% to 80%) back into escrow each month, releasing only a small amount for operational purposes. This structure limits the potential impact Ripple can have on market liquidity at any given time.

However, the company currently depends much on XRP sales, and there is a pressing need to look for more sources of income. Schwartz’s comments show that Ripple is not positioned in a way that requires dumping XRP, even as the token trades near recent lows.

XRP price chart from Tradingview.com
Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$2.0485
$2.0485$2.0485
-0.11%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30