The post Crypto Claims Disputed as ISO Rejects Token Compliance Status appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ISO confirms no cryptocurrency holds ISO 20022 compliance despite widespread online claims. Developers stress XRP and other tokens differ technically from ISO 20022 message structures. SWIFT begins full migration to ISO 20022-only payments as legacy MT messaging is retired. A wave of discussion has emerged across the crypto community following renewed scrutiny of long-circulating claims that certain cryptocurrencies are “ISO 20022 compliant.” The debate resurfaced as industry commentators highlighted code references related to XRP and RippleNet.  At the same time, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) confirmed that cryptocurrencies themselves are not granted any form of ISO certification. ISO Clarifies No Cryptocurrency Holds Compliance Status According to posts shared by analysts, Mansingh Rajput, ISO’s own website states that no cryptocurrency meets any form of ISO 20022 compliance. ISO pointed out that its financial-messaging standard defines how banks, payment systems, and financial institutions structure and exchange data. Because public blockchains operate as independent decentralized networks, ISO does not administer or certify compliance for assets such as XRP, XLM, ADA, or Quant. 🫢😲 O My God 🚨‼️This image shows part of the website of **ISO (International Organization for Standardization)**, and its meaning is very clear 👇 🔍 **It means in simple words:** > ❌ **No Cryptocurrency is ISO 20022 compliant. ** That is — Many websites, YouTube… https://t.co/lZC7Rz2GNO pic.twitter.com/L2QH5dKpBX — 𝙼𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚑 𝚁𝚊𝚓𝚙𝚞𝚝  (@Mansingh_1B) November 11, 2025 Observers noted that confusion stemmed from project teams describing their ability to structure or interpret information in ISO 20022 format. ISO has made clear that such capabilities do not translate into formal compliance. Additionally, the organization warned that online claims labeling specific tokens as compliant are incorrect. Related: SWIFT’s ISO 20022 Mandate Puts Compliant Blockchains Cardano, XRP, in Focus Developers and Engineers Reinforce the Technical Distinction Developers echoed ISO’s position by pointing to the differences… The post Crypto Claims Disputed as ISO Rejects Token Compliance Status appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ISO confirms no cryptocurrency holds ISO 20022 compliance despite widespread online claims. Developers stress XRP and other tokens differ technically from ISO 20022 message structures. SWIFT begins full migration to ISO 20022-only payments as legacy MT messaging is retired. A wave of discussion has emerged across the crypto community following renewed scrutiny of long-circulating claims that certain cryptocurrencies are “ISO 20022 compliant.” The debate resurfaced as industry commentators highlighted code references related to XRP and RippleNet.  At the same time, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) confirmed that cryptocurrencies themselves are not granted any form of ISO certification. ISO Clarifies No Cryptocurrency Holds Compliance Status According to posts shared by analysts, Mansingh Rajput, ISO’s own website states that no cryptocurrency meets any form of ISO 20022 compliance. ISO pointed out that its financial-messaging standard defines how banks, payment systems, and financial institutions structure and exchange data. Because public blockchains operate as independent decentralized networks, ISO does not administer or certify compliance for assets such as XRP, XLM, ADA, or Quant. 🫢😲 O My God 🚨‼️This image shows part of the website of **ISO (International Organization for Standardization)**, and its meaning is very clear 👇 🔍 **It means in simple words:** > ❌ **No Cryptocurrency is ISO 20022 compliant. ** That is — Many websites, YouTube… https://t.co/lZC7Rz2GNO pic.twitter.com/L2QH5dKpBX — 𝙼𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚑 𝚁𝚊𝚓𝚙𝚞𝚝  (@Mansingh_1B) November 11, 2025 Observers noted that confusion stemmed from project teams describing their ability to structure or interpret information in ISO 20022 format. ISO has made clear that such capabilities do not translate into formal compliance. Additionally, the organization warned that online claims labeling specific tokens as compliant are incorrect. Related: SWIFT’s ISO 20022 Mandate Puts Compliant Blockchains Cardano, XRP, in Focus Developers and Engineers Reinforce the Technical Distinction Developers echoed ISO’s position by pointing to the differences…

Crypto Claims Disputed as ISO Rejects Token Compliance Status

  • ISO confirms no cryptocurrency holds ISO 20022 compliance despite widespread online claims.
  • Developers stress XRP and other tokens differ technically from ISO 20022 message structures.
  • SWIFT begins full migration to ISO 20022-only payments as legacy MT messaging is retired.

A wave of discussion has emerged across the crypto community following renewed scrutiny of long-circulating claims that certain cryptocurrencies are “ISO 20022 compliant.” The debate resurfaced as industry commentators highlighted code references related to XRP and RippleNet. 

At the same time, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) confirmed that cryptocurrencies themselves are not granted any form of ISO certification.

ISO Clarifies No Cryptocurrency Holds Compliance Status

According to posts shared by analysts, Mansingh Rajput, ISO’s own website states that no cryptocurrency meets any form of ISO 20022 compliance. ISO pointed out that its financial-messaging standard defines how banks, payment systems, and financial institutions structure and exchange data. Because public blockchains operate as independent decentralized networks, ISO does not administer or certify compliance for assets such as XRP, XLM, ADA, or Quant.

Observers noted that confusion stemmed from project teams describing their ability to structure or interpret information in ISO 20022 format. ISO has made clear that such capabilities do not translate into formal compliance. Additionally, the organization warned that online claims labeling specific tokens as compliant are incorrect.

Related: SWIFT’s ISO 20022 Mandate Puts Compliant Blockchains Cardano, XRP, in Focus

Developers and Engineers Reinforce the Technical Distinction

Developers echoed ISO’s position by pointing to the differences between blockchain transaction formats and standardized financial messages. Arthur, an XRP community member, noted that XRPL transaction structures and ISO 20022 messages share no functional equivalence, describing them as fundamentally separate systems.

Another commentator added that while RippleNet, Ripple’s messaging infrastructure, uses ISO 20022 message types such as pacs.008, XRP operates independently as a settlement asset and does not form part of the messaging layer.

Industry participants also referenced earlier comments from Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson, who described ISO 20022 support as a functional requirement for linking traditional banking rails with decentralized systems. His remarks cited ADA, XRP, HBAR, and ALGO as networks positioned to interface with that standard, though without suggesting certification.

SWIFT Completes Transition to ISO 20022-Only Payments

Meanwhile, SWIFT confirmed that its coexistence period for MT and ISO 20022 formats ends this weekend. Beginning November 22, 2025, all financial institution payment instructions will be delivered exclusively in ISO 20022.

However, the network urged participants to avoid sending messages during the cutover window to prevent rejected transactions and operational delays.

Related: ​​Ripple, Hedera, Algorand, and XDC Becomes ISO 20022-Compliant Crypto Projects

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/crypto-claims-disputed-as-iso-rejects-token-compliance-status/

Market Opportunity
TokenFi Logo
TokenFi Price(TOKEN)
$0.004851
$0.004851$0.004851
+0.64%
USD
TokenFi (TOKEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X Announces Higher Creator Payouts on Platform

X Announces Higher Creator Payouts on Platform

X boosts creator payouts with Musk's new initiative, leading to increased earnings for creators.
Share
CoinLive2026/01/19 01:45
A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

The post A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix Everyone has wondered what may be the next step for KPop Demon Hunters as an IP, given its record-breaking success on Netflix. Now, the answer may be something exactly no one predicted. According to a new filing with the MPA, something called Debut: A KPop Demon Hunters Story has been rated PG by the ratings body. It’s listed alongside some other films, and this is obviously something that has not been publicly announced. A short film could be well, very short, a few minutes, and likely no more than ten. Even that might be pushing it. Using say, Pixar shorts as a reference, most are between 4 and 8 minutes. The original movie is an hour and 36 minutes. The “Debut” in the title indicates some sort of flashback, perhaps to when HUNTR/X first arrived on the scene before they blew up. Previously, director Maggie Kang has commented about how there were more backstory components that were supposed to be in the film that were cut, but hinted those could be explored in a sequel. But perhaps some may be put into a short here. I very much doubt those scenes were fully produced and simply cut, but perhaps they were finished up for this short film here. When would Debut: KPop Demon Hunters theoretically arrive? I’m not sure the other films on the list are much help. Dead of Winter is out in less than two weeks. Mother Mary does not have a release date. Ne Zha 2 came out earlier this year. I’ve only seen news stories saying The Perfect Gamble was supposed to come out in Q1 2025, but I’ve seen no evidence that it actually has. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix It could be sooner rather than later as Netflix looks to capitalize…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:23
New tech seen cutting hatchery reliance on wild mangrove crabs

New tech seen cutting hatchery reliance on wild mangrove crabs

MINDANAO State University’s Iligan Institute of Technology is developing a recirculating aquaculture system to improve hatchery survival rates for mangrove crabs
Share
Bworldonline2026/01/19 00:03