South Korea’s financial industry was struck by a coordinated supply chain attack linked to Russian and North Korean threat actors, which resulted in the deployment of Qilin ransomware and the theft of sensitive data, cybersecurity firm Bitdefender confirmed. When compiling research for its Threat Debrief October report, Bitdefender said it started investigating the campaign after […]South Korea’s financial industry was struck by a coordinated supply chain attack linked to Russian and North Korean threat actors, which resulted in the deployment of Qilin ransomware and the theft of sensitive data, cybersecurity firm Bitdefender confirmed. When compiling research for its Threat Debrief October report, Bitdefender said it started investigating the campaign after […]

South Korea’s financial industry hit in large-scale attack linked to Russian and North Korean hackers

2025/11/27 19:15
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

South Korea’s financial industry was struck by a coordinated supply chain attack linked to Russian and North Korean threat actors, which resulted in the deployment of Qilin ransomware and the theft of sensitive data, cybersecurity firm Bitdefender confirmed.

When compiling research for its Threat Debrief October report, Bitdefender said it started investigating the campaign after noticing an unusual surge in ransomware incidents in South Korea in September. 

The country recorded 25 attacks that month, a profound difference from the monthly average of only two cases recorded between September 2024 and August this year. 

South Korea targeted in Qilin ransomware attacks

According to Bitdefender’s report published last Monday, South Korea has become the second-most affected country by ransomware this year, trailing the United States only. In about 33 cases, the software security firm identified, 25 cases were attributed to the Qilin ransomware group, and 24 of the compromised entities were within the financial industry. 

“This operation combined the capabilities of a major Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) group, Qilin, with potential involvement from North Korean state-affiliated actors (Moonstone Sleet), leveraging Managed Service Provider (MSP) compromise as the initial access vector,” the report read.

Russian and North Korean hackers steal 2 TB of data from South Korean banksVictims of ransomware in Korea. Source: Bitdefender

Qilin is one of the most active ransomware groups this year, operating under a Ransomware-as-a-Service model and claiming more than 180 victims in October alone. According to threat intelligence from NCC Group, the operation is responsible for 29% of all ransomware attacks globally.

Although the group’s name comes from a Chinese mythological creature, Bitdefender believes Qilin has Russian roots. Its investigation found one of its founding members “BianLian” communicates in Russian and English and is highly active on Russian-speaking cybercrime forums. 

The group also avoids attacking organizations in the Commonwealth of Independent States, a common rule among ransomware operations based in Russia.

Qilin recruits hackers to carry out its attacks while the core operators take a share of the illicit profits. The group also boasts of having “an in-house team of journalists” to help affiliates craft extortion messages and posts for its data leak platform.

According to Bitdefender’s analysis on the Korean Leaks campaign, the hackers posed as “activists” and “patriots” by using political language to produce propaganda-style messages, and targeted the entire country’s financial industry. 

In one case from August 20 involving a construction company, the attackers warned that the stolen data had “military intelligence value.” The message claimed that plans and drawings for hundreds of completed projects, including bridges and liquefied natural gas tanks, were now publicly accessible. 

“A report on what was found in these documents is already being prepared for Comrade Kim Jong-un,” one of the leaked discussions in Qilin forums read, insinuating that hackers were sharing info with North Korea’s group leadership.

Qilin steals data totaling 2TB in three waves

The Korean Leaks operation, according to Bitdefender, unfolded in three waves that resulted in the theft of more than 1 million files and 2TB of data from 28 known victims. Posts linked to four additional entities were later removed from the data leak site, which could have been as a result of ransom payments or internal decisions by the operators.

The first wave was published on September 14 and included 10 victims from the financial management sector. The second wave followed between September 17 and September 19, adding nine more cases, while the third was released between September 28 and October 4, targeting another nine organizations. 

“We have data on dozens of companies. The Korean Leak is a reason to withdraw money from the country’s stock market, because we have a volume of data whose publication will definitely deal a serious blow to the entire Korean market. And we will definitely do it,” read one threat from the hackers during the second wave.

Bitdefender said the attackers framed the campaign as an effort to expose corruption, including threats to release documents that could be “evidence of stock market manipulation” and names of “well-known politicians and businessmen in Korea.”

On September 23, the Korean news publication JoongAng Daily reported that more than 20 asset management companies had been infected with ransomware after the breach of a service provider called GJTec.

Get $50 free to trade crypto when you sign up to Bybit now

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
Pro Global Scales Latin American Hub as Hybrid Model Accelerates Latin America Growth

Pro Global Scales Latin American Hub as Hybrid Model Accelerates Latin America Growth

Pro Global is accelerating its expansion in Latin America, with investment in its regional head office in Argentina as both international and domestic carriers
Share
ffnews2026/03/23 08:00
Tokenized deposits push Europe toward next-gen digital money

Tokenized deposits push Europe toward next-gen digital money

The post Tokenized deposits push Europe toward next-gen digital money appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. As banks rewire payments and settlement systems, tokenized
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/23 18:29