Biometric security gains traction as crypto platforms adopt eKYC and liveness tools to combat rising digital threats. Biometric technologies use physical features to enable identity verification, such as voice, fingerprints, or facial features. These methods help keep criminals from stealing…Biometric security gains traction as crypto platforms adopt eKYC and liveness tools to combat rising digital threats. Biometric technologies use physical features to enable identity verification, such as voice, fingerprints, or facial features. These methods help keep criminals from stealing…

Why biometric identification is becoming a core feature of crypto security

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Biometric security gains traction as crypto platforms adopt eKYC and liveness tools to combat rising digital threats.

Summary
  • Crypto platforms adopt biometrics like eKYC and liveness checks to stop fraud and strengthen identity security.
  • Biometric tools such as eKYC, Face2Face, and liveness tests verify users remotely and prevent spoofing attacks.
  • Trust Stamp seeks approval for its quantum-secure biometric crypto wallet as demand for stronger protection rises.

Biometric technologies use physical features to enable identity verification, such as voice, fingerprints, or facial features. These methods help keep criminals from stealing data to carry out illicit transactions, which is why crypto exchanges and individual users are increasingly integrating them. Exchanges utilize technologies such as electronic Know Your Customer (eKYC) and liveness detection to create a multilayered security system.

The use of eKYC helps verify customers effectively and remotely, without requiring their physical presence. Face2Face technology verifies users’ identities by comparing their ID photos to their faces, ensuring they are the legitimate account owners. Liveness detection prevents the use of videos or pictures to mislead facial recognition systems, provided the person undergoing verification is physically present in real time.

Interest in biometric identification is increasing amid security concerns. Recently, Trust Stamp submitted requests for confirmation from an EU regulator and the SEC regarding its biometrically secured wallet, designed to hold cryptocurrencies and stablecoins while offering quantum-secure technology and biometric validation, positioning it between software- and hardware-based storage solutions. But which solution is the most secure?

Gauging crypto wallet security and reliability

Crypto hacks constantly make headlines, leading to an understandable emphasis on security and reliability. Before exploring those, one must understand what a crypto wallet actually is. Essentially, a crypto wallet is something you can’t do without if you are considering buying and holding crypto or NFTs. A private and a public key are generated when you create an account. The wallet stores your keys and enables you to manage your assets, sign transactions, initiate transfers, generate new addresses, track portfolio balances, and interact with dApps.

There are many types of crypto wallets, including hardware wallets, paper wallets, and downloadable mobile apps. However, hardware wallet security can be on par with or even exceed the reliability of a biometric ID tool. Resembling a USB drive or a small gadget, hardware wallets protect private keys from online systems, significantly reducing the risk of malware attacks or online hacks. When you initiate a transaction, your private key never leaves the wallet’s secure environment, as the respective data is signed within the device. 

Despite their offline design, these wallets can connect to the internet when plugged into a device to execute a transaction. Typically, this interaction is brief, and the private keys remain protected.

Biometric and hardware wallet features can coexist

Biometric and hardware wallet features can coexist to improve security. Hardware wallets can support fingerprint authentication along with thousands of cryptocurrencies and NFTs. Some are equipped with biometric keys and EAL5+- certified security chips, enabling offline private key storage and supporting a large number of addresses. There are open-source, air-gapped hardware wallets that can operate via QR codes and feature biometric readers and security chips.

When viewed separately, both biometric and hardware wallets have their pluses and minuses. Hardware wallets offer high-level security as private keys are generated and stored offline. Like they say: not your keys, not your crypto. At the same time, it’s worth mentioning that hardware wallets don’t actually store your assets; those remain on the blockchain. A certain degree of tech-savviness is needed to operate specific solutions, like cold storage. Once they have their seed key, passphrase, and password set up, some people even run a few cycles of deleting and restoring the wallet before sending funds. 

Weighing the pluses and minuses

Proponents of biometric ID believe it can add a much-needed layer of security, and a glance at the latest headlines is enough to understand their view. According to security experts, North Korea has infiltrated up to a fifth of crypto companies. Experts estimate that over a third of applicants at crypto firms are North Koreans attempting to gain employment, as they aren’t allowed to apply for jobs under their real identities due to international sanctions. They have found a workaround that involves recruiting others to serve as fake employees, who they use to infiltrate systems and steal data. According to recent data from the US Treasury Department, North Korean cybercrime operations have netted crypto worth over $3 billion.

Biometric ID is typically used to compare users’ faces to faces captured during ID verification. Unlike codes or passwords, one cannot guess, phish, or forget facial features, fingerprints, or voice. A core component of multi-factor authentication is “something you are,” which category these traits fall in. 

Biometric systems follow a thorough process consisting of basic steps to ensure security, including capture, extract, convert, compare, and verify. The system starts by capturing a live image of your face or another biometric trait and analyzing a specific feature, such as the jawline shape. It then converts the feature into a key or digital template and compares the stored reference to a new live sample during login. Access is granted only if the match is intense.

Some systems store biometric data in its original form, which can raise security and privacy concerns. Other systems transform biometric data into a cryptographic key and avoid storing it altogether, which provides more reliable, built-in privacy protection.

Critics say biometrics are an extra layer of convenience, not security, and believe they aren’t reliable enough. False negatives and positives can occur, which is why a regular password still unlocks a consumer electronic device when the biometric scan fails. Biometric ID features can make devices less trustworthy, more complicated, and ultimately more likely to fail. Each login option opens an additional attack vector, and while you can change a password, you can’t change a finger if someone manages to copy your print.

Beyond a novelty: the future of biometric identification 

Biometric ID is becoming a core feature of crypto security thanks to the additional safety it offers, making it much more than a notable novelty in storage options. Features like facial recognition or fingerprints can coexist with traditional wallet features like passwords and passphrases to ensure a safe journey for crypto users, regardless of their background and expertise.

Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.

Market Opportunity
Core DAO Logo
Core DAO Price(CORE)
$0.1266
$0.1266$0.1266
-0.86%
USD
Core DAO (CORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Moldova to regulate cryptocurrency ownership and trading in 2026

Moldova to regulate cryptocurrency ownership and trading in 2026

The Eastern European nation of Moldova will regulate cryptocurrency ownership and transactions as part of a comprehensive framework to be adopted this year. Admittedly
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 00:25
Disney Pockets $2.2 Billion For Filming Outside America

Disney Pockets $2.2 Billion For Filming Outside America

The post Disney Pockets $2.2 Billion For Filming Outside America appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disney has made $2.2 billion from filming productions like ‘Avengers: Endgame’ in the U.K. ©Marvel Studios 2018 Disney has been handed $2.2 billion by the government of the United Kingdom over the past 15 years in return for filming movies and streaming shows in the country according to analysis of more than 400 company filings Disney is believed to be the biggest single beneficiary of the Audio-Visual Expenditure Credit (AVEC) in the U.K. which gives studios a cash reimbursement of up to 25.5% of the money they spend there. The generous fiscal incentives have attracted all of the major Hollywood studios to the U.K. and the country has reeled in the returns from it. Data from the British Film Institute (BFI) shows that foreign studios contributed around 87% of the $2.2 billion (£1.6 billion) spent on making films in the U.K. last year. It is a 7.6% increase on the sum spent in 2019 and is in stark contrast to the picture in the United States. According to permit issuing office FilmLA, the number of on-location shooting days in Los Angeles fell 35.7% from 2019 to 2024 making it the second-least productive year since 1995 aside from 2020 when it was the height of the pandemic. The outlook hasn’t improved since then with FilmLA’s latest data showing that between April and June this year there was a 6.2% drop in shooting days on the same period a year ago. It followed a 22.4% decline in the first quarter with FilmLA noting that “each drop reflected the impact of global production cutbacks and California’s ongoing loss of work to rival territories.” The one-two punch of the pandemic followed by the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strikes put Hollywood on the ropes just as the U.K. began drafting a plan to improve its fiscal incentives…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:20
JuanHand: Double-digit loan growth likely ’til 2030

JuanHand: Double-digit loan growth likely ’til 2030

JUANHAND Lending Corp. expects the Philippine financial technology (fintech) industry to sustain high-double-digit loan growth through 2030, after a resilient performance
Share
Bworldonline2026/01/16 00:04