The post Famine In Sudan And How The Powerful Use Starvation As A Weapon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Sudanese residents gather to receive free meals in Al Fasher, a city besieged by Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) for more than a year, in Darfur region, on August 11, 2025. (Photo by AFP) (Photo by STR/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Famine Is Stalking Across Sudan Famine in Sudan endangers about 25 million people. Nearly half the country is now experiencing severe food insecurity, which UN-backed analysts describe as “the most extreme hunger crisis globally.” This crisis is not mainly caused by drought. It is driven by power struggles and conflict. Since April 2023, fighting between Sudan’s army and the Rapid Support Forces has devastated the country. Cities have been bombed, markets and warehouses looted, and essential roads for food and medicine deliberately blocked — a pattern confirmed in recent authoritative IPC reports. UN human rights experts and humanitarian agencies have identified sieges and blockades that have trapped civilians without supplies. According to the Sudan Doctor’s Union, in the Kordofan region alone, in the besieged city of Kadugli and the town of Dilling, doctors reported 23 children dying of malnutrition in a single month because food and medical aid could not get through. Sudan is not “sliding” into famine; large parts of its population are being pushed there. International humanitarian law anticipated such crimes. The Geneva Conventions clearly stated that “starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is prohibited.” The rule exists because, time and again, those in power have used hunger as a tool of control and dominance. However, this is not the first time famine has been exploited to subjugate a population. Previous Uses Of Famine To Subdue Populations History offers a grim list of precedents. The Great Irish Famine of the 1840s was caused by potato blight during a period when, under… The post Famine In Sudan And How The Powerful Use Starvation As A Weapon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Sudanese residents gather to receive free meals in Al Fasher, a city besieged by Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) for more than a year, in Darfur region, on August 11, 2025. (Photo by AFP) (Photo by STR/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Famine Is Stalking Across Sudan Famine in Sudan endangers about 25 million people. Nearly half the country is now experiencing severe food insecurity, which UN-backed analysts describe as “the most extreme hunger crisis globally.” This crisis is not mainly caused by drought. It is driven by power struggles and conflict. Since April 2023, fighting between Sudan’s army and the Rapid Support Forces has devastated the country. Cities have been bombed, markets and warehouses looted, and essential roads for food and medicine deliberately blocked — a pattern confirmed in recent authoritative IPC reports. UN human rights experts and humanitarian agencies have identified sieges and blockades that have trapped civilians without supplies. According to the Sudan Doctor’s Union, in the Kordofan region alone, in the besieged city of Kadugli and the town of Dilling, doctors reported 23 children dying of malnutrition in a single month because food and medical aid could not get through. Sudan is not “sliding” into famine; large parts of its population are being pushed there. International humanitarian law anticipated such crimes. The Geneva Conventions clearly stated that “starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is prohibited.” The rule exists because, time and again, those in power have used hunger as a tool of control and dominance. However, this is not the first time famine has been exploited to subjugate a population. Previous Uses Of Famine To Subdue Populations History offers a grim list of precedents. The Great Irish Famine of the 1840s was caused by potato blight during a period when, under…

Famine In Sudan And How The Powerful Use Starvation As A Weapon

Sudanese residents gather to receive free meals in Al Fasher, a city besieged by Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) for more than a year, in Darfur region, on August 11, 2025. (Photo by AFP) (Photo by STR/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

Famine Is Stalking Across Sudan

Famine in Sudan endangers about 25 million people. Nearly half the country is now experiencing severe food insecurity, which UN-backed analysts describe as “the most extreme hunger crisis globally.” This crisis is not mainly caused by drought. It is driven by power struggles and conflict. Since April 2023, fighting between Sudan’s army and the Rapid Support Forces has devastated the country. Cities have been bombed, markets and warehouses looted, and essential roads for food and medicine deliberately blocked — a pattern confirmed in recent authoritative IPC reports.

UN human rights experts and humanitarian agencies have identified sieges and blockades that have trapped civilians without supplies. According to the Sudan Doctor’s Union, in the Kordofan region alone, in the besieged city of Kadugli and the town of Dilling, doctors reported 23 children dying of malnutrition in a single month because food and medical aid could not get through. Sudan is not “sliding” into famine; large parts of its population are being pushed there.

International humanitarian law anticipated such crimes. The Geneva Conventions clearly stated that “starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is prohibited.” The rule exists because, time and again, those in power have used hunger as a tool of control and dominance. However, this is not the first time famine has been exploited to subjugate a population.

Previous Uses Of Famine To Subdue Populations

History offers a grim list of precedents.

The Great Irish Famine of the 1840s was caused by potato blight during a period when, under British rule, Ireland exported food and adhered to rigid market principles that resulted in approximately one million deaths and forced many more to emigrate. Many historians now refer to the potato crisis as a classic example of a policy-driven famine influenced by British ideology and neglect.

During the Second World War, Nazi planners devised a “Hunger Plan” to divert food from occupied Soviet territories to Germany. The Nazis were fully aware that millions of Soviet civilians would face starvation. In other words, starvation was a intentional policy, not an accident. According to at least one estimate, over 4 million people died. This is not even count Jews and others who perished from hunger in Nazi concentration camps or in Nazi ghettos, another important example that included forced starvation.

In China under Mao, the Great Leap Forward involved forced collectivization, unrealistic grain quotas, and state procurement, which contributed to the Great Chinese Famine, widely acknowledged as one of the worst man-made disasters in history. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, about 20 million people died.

In the late 1960s, during the Nigerian civil war, the federal blockade of Biafra was so severe that thousands of children died each day. Experts say that about 500,000 to 3 million people died in Biafra as a result.

More recently, during a developing situation following the October 7th, 2023 Hamas attack on Israelis, Israel announced a “complete siege” of Gaza with “no electricity, no food, no fuel” to be permitted. Severe restrictions on such essential supplies were imposed. In December 2024, Human Rights Watch accused Israel of using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. In August 2025, a new IPC analysis confirmed that famine existed in parts of Gaza, where more than half a million people were trapped in conditions of extreme hunger.

Famine In Today’s World

Meanwhile, Russia’s war on Ukraine is tightening the noose around Sudan’s famine from two angles at once.

By blockading Ukrainian Black Sea ports when Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, then walking away from a later UN-brokered Black Sea Grain Initiative, and subsequently bombing ports and Danube terminals, Moscow has been trying to choke off millions of tonnes of grain destined for world markets, raising prices and squeezing African importers like Sudan. For example, in early 2024, through programs like “Grain From Ukraine,” 7,600 tonnes of Ukrainian wheat flour arrived at Port Sudan – enough to feed about one million people for a month. However, the Russian naval threat persists to this day.

At the same time, Russian missiles, mines, and occupation have devastated Ukraine’s farmland, silos, and power grid, enabling systematic theft of grain from occupied areas and crippling Ukraine’s capacity to produce enough grain to feed itself and a hungry world. For Ukrainians, this is painfully familiar. In 1932–33, Stalin’s Holodomor famine in Ukraine was engineered by seizing grain, sealing borders, and exporting food while villages faced starvation. Today’s Kremlin may be using different methods, but its actions follow the same logic of turning food into a weapon. The outcome is that Sudanese families are now feeling the effects of decisions made in Moscow, just as Ukrainian villagers once did under Stalin, and now again under Putin.

Grotesque Inequality

All this takes place in a world of grotesque inequality. According to Oxfam’s 2024 inequality report, billionaire wealth increased by about $2 trillion in 2024 alone, three times faster than the previous year, while global poverty has barely changed since 1990. A few states and corporations control grain, fertilizer, shipping, and insurance.

In a world as rich as ours, famine in Sudan is an indictment, not an inevitability A global system that allows a few governments and corporations to profit while blockades, sieges, and deliberate destruction of farms push entire populations toward starvation is a system that has chosen its side. Sudan’s famine is the latest warning that hunger is being used, once again, as a weapon. Whether this becomes another chapter in the long list of avoidable famines, or the moment the world finally treats engineered hunger as intolerable, depends on whether richer, safer nations are willing to prevent famine in Sudan, or potentially in Gaza or Ukraine for that matter.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/andyjsemotiuk/2025/11/30/famine-in-sudan-and-how-the-powerful-use-starvation-as-a-weapon/

Market Opportunity
FreeRossDAO Logo
FreeRossDAO Price(FREE)
$0.00011985
$0.00011985$0.00011985
+0.78%
USD
FreeRossDAO (FREE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X, the most widely used app for crypto projects, is changing its API access policy. InfoFi projects, which proliferated non-organic bot content, will be cut off
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 02:50
X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

The post X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X has revoked API access for apps that reward users for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 03:42
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00