The post Google Lets You Fake An AI Date With Sydney Sweeney: How Is This Allowed? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Anyone But You Anyone But You I have watched AI models slowly evolve like mutating viruses over the last few years, but one of the first was Midjourney, the image generator that quickly became the target of ire among artists as it was clear the system had eaten an internet’s worth of work, and was spitting it back out in a warped fashion on command. But more than a month ago on August 26, we have entered new territory with Google’s Nano Banana Pro image generator, one that has finally reached a threshold of photorealism that even AI-hunters can’t tell what’s real and what’s fake with the levels the system has reached. That’s its own problem for global disinformation, of course, but what’s also bizarre is how Google has seemingly been allowed to run absolutely wild with licensed IP and celebrity likeness. Sure, the system has guardrails on violent and sexual content (mostly), but IP rights? Likeness use? Nothing, no restrictions. At this point, you can make any celebrity do anything within reason. Brad Pitt surfing. Glen Powell dressed as Batman. Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine eating hot dogs. But now things are getting even weirder. How about going on a date with Sydney Sweeney, Alexandra Daddario or Emma Stone? Yeesh. The system is also generating celebrities even without being told to. Tell it to make a grizzled apocalypse survivor, and you’ll find it looks suspiciously like Pedro Pascal. A female action star? Hey, isn’t that Emily Blunt? I think you might be able to imagine what a “world-famous pop star in a silver dress” may turn into. This is all in sharp contrast to Sora 2, OpenAI’s video generation model that also produced very believable fakes, but did launch with at least some guardrails against many celebrities. Not so much certain… The post Google Lets You Fake An AI Date With Sydney Sweeney: How Is This Allowed? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Anyone But You Anyone But You I have watched AI models slowly evolve like mutating viruses over the last few years, but one of the first was Midjourney, the image generator that quickly became the target of ire among artists as it was clear the system had eaten an internet’s worth of work, and was spitting it back out in a warped fashion on command. But more than a month ago on August 26, we have entered new territory with Google’s Nano Banana Pro image generator, one that has finally reached a threshold of photorealism that even AI-hunters can’t tell what’s real and what’s fake with the levels the system has reached. That’s its own problem for global disinformation, of course, but what’s also bizarre is how Google has seemingly been allowed to run absolutely wild with licensed IP and celebrity likeness. Sure, the system has guardrails on violent and sexual content (mostly), but IP rights? Likeness use? Nothing, no restrictions. At this point, you can make any celebrity do anything within reason. Brad Pitt surfing. Glen Powell dressed as Batman. Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine eating hot dogs. But now things are getting even weirder. How about going on a date with Sydney Sweeney, Alexandra Daddario or Emma Stone? Yeesh. The system is also generating celebrities even without being told to. Tell it to make a grizzled apocalypse survivor, and you’ll find it looks suspiciously like Pedro Pascal. A female action star? Hey, isn’t that Emily Blunt? I think you might be able to imagine what a “world-famous pop star in a silver dress” may turn into. This is all in sharp contrast to Sora 2, OpenAI’s video generation model that also produced very believable fakes, but did launch with at least some guardrails against many celebrities. Not so much certain…

Google Lets You Fake An AI Date With Sydney Sweeney: How Is This Allowed?

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Anyone But You

Anyone But You

I have watched AI models slowly evolve like mutating viruses over the last few years, but one of the first was Midjourney, the image generator that quickly became the target of ire among artists as it was clear the system had eaten an internet’s worth of work, and was spitting it back out in a warped fashion on command.

But more than a month ago on August 26, we have entered new territory with Google’s Nano Banana Pro image generator, one that has finally reached a threshold of photorealism that even AI-hunters can’t tell what’s real and what’s fake with the levels the system has reached.

That’s its own problem for global disinformation, of course, but what’s also bizarre is how Google has seemingly been allowed to run absolutely wild with licensed IP and celebrity likeness. Sure, the system has guardrails on violent and sexual content (mostly), but IP rights? Likeness use? Nothing, no restrictions.

At this point, you can make any celebrity do anything within reason. Brad Pitt surfing. Glen Powell dressed as Batman. Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine eating hot dogs. But now things are getting even weirder. How about going on a date with Sydney Sweeney, Alexandra Daddario or Emma Stone? Yeesh.

The system is also generating celebrities even without being told to. Tell it to make a grizzled apocalypse survivor, and you’ll find it looks suspiciously like Pedro Pascal. A female action star? Hey, isn’t that Emily Blunt? I think you might be able to imagine what a “world-famous pop star in a silver dress” may turn into.

This is all in sharp contrast to Sora 2, OpenAI’s video generation model that also produced very believable fakes, but did launch with at least some guardrails against many celebrities. Not so much certain IP (literally no video games), but there were very, very fast crackdowns on public figures and licensed IPs within days of its launch.

That has not remotely happened here. Google has almost no limits. Use any celebrity, any licensed character by typing in their exact name and what you want them to be doing. And as more and more people find more and more prompts to up Nano Banana’s photorealism even further, these get more and more indistinguishable from reality. Though good luck convincing people Sydney Sweeney went on a date with you.

It’s unclear how Google is getting away with this when almost all other GenAI models have had to clamp down on well-known people or characters, and has done so for over a month now. Many things slip through, of course, in other models, but typing in “Tom Cruise shirtless” is sure not going to get you a picture of Tom Cruise shirtless on Midjourney. Nano Banana? Yep, I just did it, and I’m looking at him right now. As much as I felt creepy entering it, “Margot Robbie topless” did not even get flagged (she was at least holding a sun hat over her front). What are we even doing here?

I have no idea when or if Google is going to get in trouble for this, or if it’s too big to care. But once more and more celebrities and rights holders figure out this is happening on a global scale, you have to imagine this is going to escalate. It’s hard to believe it hasn’t already.

Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram.

Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2025/12/01/google-lets-you-fake-an-ai-date-with-sydney-sweeney-how-is-this-allowed/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight

American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight

The post American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: American Bitcoin (ABTC) surged nearly 85% on its Nasdaq debut, briefly reaching a $5B valuation. The Trump family, alongside Hut 8 Mining, controls 98% of the newly merged crypto-mining entity. Eric Trump called Bitcoin “modern-day gold,” predicting it could reach $1 million per coin. American Bitcoin, a fast-rising crypto mining firm with strong political and institutional backing, has officially entered Wall Street. After merging with Gryphon Digital Mining, the company made its Nasdaq debut under the ticker ABTC, instantly drawing global attention to both its stock performance and its bold vision for Bitcoin’s future. Read More: Trump-Backed Crypto Firm Eyes Asia for Bold Bitcoin Expansion Nasdaq Debut: An Explosive First Day ABTC’s first day of trading proved as dramatic as expected. Shares surged almost 85% at the open, touching a peak of $14 before settling at lower levels by the close. That initial spike valued the company around $5 billion, positioning it as one of 2025’s most-watched listings. At the last session, ABTC has been trading at $7.28 per share, which is a small positive 2.97% per day. Although the price has decelerated since opening highs, analysts note that the company has been off to a strong start and early investor activity is a hard-to-find feat in a newly-launched crypto mining business. According to market watchers, the listing comes at a time of new momentum in the digital asset markets. With Bitcoin trading above $110,000 this quarter, American Bitcoin’s entry comes at a time when both institutional investors and retail traders are showing heightened interest in exposure to Bitcoin-linked equities. Ownership Structure: Trump Family and Hut 8 at the Helm Its management and ownership set up has increased the visibility of the company. The Trump family and the Canadian mining giant Hut 8 Mining jointly own 98 percent…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:33
Tether Engages Big Four for First Full Audit – Crypto News Bitcoin News

Tether Engages Big Four for First Full Audit – Crypto News Bitcoin News

The post Tether Engages Big Four for First Full Audit – Crypto News Bitcoin News appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. New Transparency Push for Tether With Major
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/25 04:39
Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For

Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For

The post Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Federal Reserve on Wednesday will conclude a two-day policymaking meeting and release a decision on whether to lower interest rates—following months of pressure and criticism from President Donald Trump—and potentially signal whether additional cuts are on the way. President Donald Trump has urged the central bank to “CUT INTEREST RATES, NOW, AND BIGGER” than they might plan to. Getty Images Key Facts The central bank is poised to cut interest rates by at least a quarter-point, down from the 4.25% to 4.5% range where they have been held since December to between 4% and 4.25%, as Wall Street has placed 100% odds of a rate cut, according to CME’s FedWatch, with higher odds (94%) on a quarter-point cut than a half-point (6%) reduction. Fed governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both Trump appointees, voted in July for a quarter-point reduction to rates, and they may dissent again in favor of a large cut alongside Stephen Miran, Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers’ chair, who was sworn in at the meeting’s start on Tuesday. It’s unclear whether other policymakers, including Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid and St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem, will favor larger cuts or opt for no reduction. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in his Jackson Hole, Wyoming, address last month the central bank would likely consider a looser monetary policy, noting the “shifting balance of risks” on the U.S. economy “may warrant adjusting our policy stance.” David Mericle, an economist for Goldman Sachs, wrote in a note the “key question” for the Fed’s meeting is whether policymakers signal “this is likely the first in a series of consecutive cuts” as the central bank is anticipated to “acknowledge the softening in the labor market,” though they may not “nod to an October cut.” Mericle said he…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:23