Tokyo Electron’s Taiwan unit has been accused of violating Taiwan’s National Security Act and Trade Secrets Act. Prosecutors are asking that Tokyo Electron be fined several million dollars for its alleged role in the theft of TSMC’s trade secrets.  Taiwanese prosecutors have filed criminal charges against the Taiwan unit of Tokyo Electron (TEL), the Japanese […]Tokyo Electron’s Taiwan unit has been accused of violating Taiwan’s National Security Act and Trade Secrets Act. Prosecutors are asking that Tokyo Electron be fined several million dollars for its alleged role in the theft of TSMC’s trade secrets.  Taiwanese prosecutors have filed criminal charges against the Taiwan unit of Tokyo Electron (TEL), the Japanese […]

Tokyo Electron becomes latest charged over TSMC trade secrets

2025/12/03 07:11
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Tokyo Electron’s Taiwan unit has been accused of violating Taiwan’s National Security Act and Trade Secrets Act. Prosecutors are asking that Tokyo Electron be fined several million dollars for its alleged role in the theft of TSMC’s trade secrets. 

Taiwanese prosecutors have filed criminal charges against the Taiwan unit of Tokyo Electron (TEL), the Japanese chip equipment supplier. The charges allege that the company had a role in the theft of trade secrets from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC). 

Tokyo Electron’s Taiwan unit sees legal trouble

The charges against the department were announced on Tuesday, December 2, 2025, and are being pursued under both Taiwan’s Trade Secrets Act and the powerful National Security Act.

This case is the first in which a corporation in Taiwan will be indicted under the National Security Act for the alleged theft of “national core critical technology trade secrets.”

The prosecutors are seeking a fine of up to NT$120 million (around $3.8 million) against the Tokyo Electron unit if it is convicted. 

The main accusation is that the company allegedly failed to prevent the crime. Prosecutors pointed out that Tokyo Electron has internal rules, and still the unit “lacked evidence of concrete preventive or managerial measures” to stop the theft. Therefore, they argue the company must face corporate criminal liability.

In August 2025, a former TSMC employee, surname Chen, who later worked for the Tokyo Electron Taiwan unit, and two current TSMC engineers were indicted. Chen is accused of using his connections to convince his former colleagues to share confidential information about TSMC’s 2-nanometer (2nm) chip process technology. 

The motivation for the theft was reportedly to help Tokyo Electron improve its etching equipment and secure valuable contracts for TSMC’s most advanced manufacturing line.

Tokyo Electron has stated it is cooperating with the investigation and also previously denied any organizational involvement in the alleged theft, saying the company does not tolerate staff misconduct. 

TSMC’s legal battles  

TSMC has taken steps to protect its intellectual property recently, including filing a lawsuit against its former senior vice president, Wei-Jen Lo, who retired in July 2025 and joined the rival company Intel Corp. as an executive vice president. 

TSMC’s lawsuit, which was filed in November, alleges that there is a “high probability” that Lo will “use, leak, disclose, deliver, or transfer TSMC’s trade secrets and confidential information to Intel,” violating his non-compete agreement and the Trade Secrets Act.

Lo had stated he would join an “academic institution” upon departure, but that turned out to be false. 

Taiwanese prosecutors have opened a criminal investigation into Lo’s case, seizing computers and other digital evidence from his homes and suggesting he is suspected of violating the National Security Act. 

Intel’s CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, dismissed the allegations as speculation and stated that Intel “respects intellectual property rights” and has strict policies to prevent the use of third-party confidential information.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why Localization Services Matter for Software Companies

Why Localization Services Matter for Software Companies

Rarely does software designed for one market translate smoothly to another. The most obvious obstacle is language, but it’s not the only one. Before a product feels
Share
Techbullion2026/03/25 19:10
₹71L CoinDCX Fraud Case Turns, Court Finds No Link to Founders

₹71L CoinDCX Fraud Case Turns, Court Finds No Link to Founders

Court grants bail to CoinDCX founders after ₹71L scam traced to fake site; no link found, funds recovered, platform secure. The court granted bail to CoinDCX founders
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/03/25 19:43
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52