US Representative Stephen Lynch challenged Federal Reserve Vice Chair Michelle Bowman on Tuesday, questioning her past statements encouraging banks to “engage fully” with digital assets.  Lynch also inquired about the Fed’s role in advancing crypto regulatory requirements, while also highlighting confusion regarding the definition of stablecoins.  Lynch confronts Fed on crypto oversight and stablecoin definitions During an oversight hearing, Lynch cited Bowman’s comments at the November Santander International Banking Conference, where she expressed support for banks “[engaging] fully” with digital assets. Bowman clarified that her comments applied broadly to digital assets, rather than specifically to cryptocurrencies.  Lynch pressed her on the distinction between digital assets and stablecoins, and the discussion shifted. Bowman replied that Congress, through the GENIUS Act—a law regulating payment stablecoins—has authorised the Fed to develop a framework for digital asset activities. “The GENIUS Act requires us to promulgate regulations to allow these types of activities,” Bowman said. Though the price of several digital assets can be volatile, stablecoins, like those pegged to the US dollar, are generally “stable,” as the name suggests.  While there have been some occasions where some coins have depegged from their respective currencies, like the crash of Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin some three years ago, the overwhelming majority of stablecoins do not fluctuate past 1% of their peg. Bowman earlier noted that staff at the Fed should be allowed to hold small “amounts of crypto or other types of digital assets” to grasp better how the technology works. FDIC prepares national stablecoin framework under GENIUS Act Travis Hill, acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, was also present at Tuesday’s hearing. The government agency is one of many responsible for implementing the GENIUS Act, which US President Donald Trump signed into law in July. According to Hill, the FDIC will propose a stablecoin framework “later this month,” which will include requirements for supervising issuers. In a few weeks, the legislative Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will release its first set of proposed guidelines under the GENIUS Act. This represents a significant step forward for the US in its efforts to establish a legislative framework for stablecoins.  According to Hill, the proposal will explain how stablecoin issuers linked to FDIC-insured banks are regulated and monitored nationwide, moving away from the current system of fragmented, state-by-state monitoring. That’s only part of a broader effort by regulators to make clearer how traditional banking authorities monitor digital assets such as stablecoins and tokenized deposits. The FDIC’s plan follows President Donald Trump’s signing of a law in July that, for the first time, establishes national requirements for US stablecoins. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US stablecoins (GENIUS) Act establishes the first government rules for payment stablecoins. It assigns tasks to the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to ensure the law is carried out. These agencies recently informed the House Financial Services Committee about their plans. This means that the law would eliminate the need for different state systems and establish a single national standard for issuer licensing and supervision. According to the framework, federal prudential regulators will be responsible for bank-linked issuers; however, states will still be responsible for non-bank businesses unless new rules expand the federal reach.  The acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation noted that the FDIC will directly oversee the subsidiaries of FDIC-insured banks that want to issue stablecoins. Before a bank’s subsidiary launches a stablecoin, it must submit a formal application. The FDIC will then scrutinize the bank’s business strategies, risk management practices, and compliance procedures. The first rule this month will establish the application framework for issuers connected to banks. A second proposal, scheduled for release early next year, will establish capital, liquidity, and reserve asset norms for payment stablecoin issuers. These will be the main regulatory protections for this group. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.US Representative Stephen Lynch challenged Federal Reserve Vice Chair Michelle Bowman on Tuesday, questioning her past statements encouraging banks to “engage fully” with digital assets.  Lynch also inquired about the Fed’s role in advancing crypto regulatory requirements, while also highlighting confusion regarding the definition of stablecoins.  Lynch confronts Fed on crypto oversight and stablecoin definitions During an oversight hearing, Lynch cited Bowman’s comments at the November Santander International Banking Conference, where she expressed support for banks “[engaging] fully” with digital assets. Bowman clarified that her comments applied broadly to digital assets, rather than specifically to cryptocurrencies.  Lynch pressed her on the distinction between digital assets and stablecoins, and the discussion shifted. Bowman replied that Congress, through the GENIUS Act—a law regulating payment stablecoins—has authorised the Fed to develop a framework for digital asset activities. “The GENIUS Act requires us to promulgate regulations to allow these types of activities,” Bowman said. Though the price of several digital assets can be volatile, stablecoins, like those pegged to the US dollar, are generally “stable,” as the name suggests.  While there have been some occasions where some coins have depegged from their respective currencies, like the crash of Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin some three years ago, the overwhelming majority of stablecoins do not fluctuate past 1% of their peg. Bowman earlier noted that staff at the Fed should be allowed to hold small “amounts of crypto or other types of digital assets” to grasp better how the technology works. FDIC prepares national stablecoin framework under GENIUS Act Travis Hill, acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, was also present at Tuesday’s hearing. The government agency is one of many responsible for implementing the GENIUS Act, which US President Donald Trump signed into law in July. According to Hill, the FDIC will propose a stablecoin framework “later this month,” which will include requirements for supervising issuers. In a few weeks, the legislative Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will release its first set of proposed guidelines under the GENIUS Act. This represents a significant step forward for the US in its efforts to establish a legislative framework for stablecoins.  According to Hill, the proposal will explain how stablecoin issuers linked to FDIC-insured banks are regulated and monitored nationwide, moving away from the current system of fragmented, state-by-state monitoring. That’s only part of a broader effort by regulators to make clearer how traditional banking authorities monitor digital assets such as stablecoins and tokenized deposits. The FDIC’s plan follows President Donald Trump’s signing of a law in July that, for the first time, establishes national requirements for US stablecoins. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US stablecoins (GENIUS) Act establishes the first government rules for payment stablecoins. It assigns tasks to the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to ensure the law is carried out. These agencies recently informed the House Financial Services Committee about their plans. This means that the law would eliminate the need for different state systems and establish a single national standard for issuer licensing and supervision. According to the framework, federal prudential regulators will be responsible for bank-linked issuers; however, states will still be responsible for non-bank businesses unless new rules expand the federal reach.  The acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation noted that the FDIC will directly oversee the subsidiaries of FDIC-insured banks that want to issue stablecoins. Before a bank’s subsidiary launches a stablecoin, it must submit a formal application. The FDIC will then scrutinize the bank’s business strategies, risk management practices, and compliance procedures. The first rule this month will establish the application framework for issuers connected to banks. A second proposal, scheduled for release early next year, will establish capital, liquidity, and reserve asset norms for payment stablecoin issuers. These will be the main regulatory protections for this group. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Lawmakers slam Fed on crypto as FDIC readies stablecoin rules

2025/12/03 07:55
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

US Representative Stephen Lynch challenged Federal Reserve Vice Chair Michelle Bowman on Tuesday, questioning her past statements encouraging banks to “engage fully” with digital assets.

 Lynch also inquired about the Fed’s role in advancing crypto regulatory requirements, while also highlighting confusion regarding the definition of stablecoins. 

Lynch confronts Fed on crypto oversight and stablecoin definitions

During an oversight hearing, Lynch cited Bowman’s comments at the November Santander International Banking Conference, where she expressed support for banks “[engaging] fully” with digital assets. Bowman clarified that her comments applied broadly to digital assets, rather than specifically to cryptocurrencies. 

Lynch pressed her on the distinction between digital assets and stablecoins, and the discussion shifted. Bowman replied that Congress, through the GENIUS Act—a law regulating payment stablecoins—has authorised the Fed to develop a framework for digital asset activities.

“The GENIUS Act requires us to promulgate regulations to allow these types of activities,” Bowman said.

Though the price of several digital assets can be volatile, stablecoins, like those pegged to the US dollar, are generally “stable,” as the name suggests. 

While there have been some occasions where some coins have depegged from their respective currencies, like the crash of Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin some three years ago, the overwhelming majority of stablecoins do not fluctuate past 1% of their peg.

Bowman earlier noted that staff at the Fed should be allowed to hold small “amounts of crypto or other types of digital assets” to grasp better how the technology works.

FDIC prepares national stablecoin framework under GENIUS Act

Travis Hill, acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, was also present at Tuesday’s hearing. The government agency is one of many responsible for implementing the GENIUS Act, which US President Donald Trump signed into law in July.

According to Hill, the FDIC will propose a stablecoin framework “later this month,” which will include requirements for supervising issuers.

In a few weeks, the legislative Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will release its first set of proposed guidelines under the GENIUS Act. This represents a significant step forward for the US in its efforts to establish a legislative framework for stablecoins. 

According to Hill, the proposal will explain how stablecoin issuers linked to FDIC-insured banks are regulated and monitored nationwide, moving away from the current system of fragmented, state-by-state monitoring.

That’s only part of a broader effort by regulators to make clearer how traditional banking authorities monitor digital assets such as stablecoins and tokenized deposits. The FDIC’s plan follows President Donald Trump’s signing of a law in July that, for the first time, establishes national requirements for US stablecoins.

The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US stablecoins (GENIUS) Act establishes the first government rules for payment stablecoins. It assigns tasks to the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to ensure the law is carried out.

These agencies recently informed the House Financial Services Committee about their plans. This means that the law would eliminate the need for different state systems and establish a single national standard for issuer licensing and supervision.

According to the framework, federal prudential regulators will be responsible for bank-linked issuers; however, states will still be responsible for non-bank businesses unless new rules expand the federal reach.

 The acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation noted that the FDIC will directly oversee the subsidiaries of FDIC-insured banks that want to issue stablecoins. Before a bank’s subsidiary launches a stablecoin, it must submit a formal application. The FDIC will then scrutinize the bank’s business strategies, risk management practices, and compliance procedures.

The first rule this month will establish the application framework for issuers connected to banks. A second proposal, scheduled for release early next year, will establish capital, liquidity, and reserve asset norms for payment stablecoin issuers. These will be the main regulatory protections for this group.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Market Opportunity
The AI Prophecy Logo
The AI Prophecy Price(ACT)
$0.01375
$0.01375$0.01375
-0.57%
USD
The AI Prophecy (ACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why Localization Services Matter for Software Companies

Why Localization Services Matter for Software Companies

Rarely does software designed for one market translate smoothly to another. The most obvious obstacle is language, but it’s not the only one. Before a product feels
Share
Techbullion2026/03/25 19:10
₹71L CoinDCX Fraud Case Turns, Court Finds No Link to Founders

₹71L CoinDCX Fraud Case Turns, Court Finds No Link to Founders

Court grants bail to CoinDCX founders after ₹71L scam traced to fake site; no link found, funds recovered, platform secure. The court granted bail to CoinDCX founders
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/03/25 19:43
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52