The post Gala quietly changes bridge keys after users flag ‘unauthorized’ withdrawals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Concerned members of the Gala Games community have identified a series of “unauthorized” withdrawals from the GalaChain bridge. Spanning almost a month, between October 13 and November 10, the transfers total 140 million GALA, worth approximately $1.5 million at the time. Given Gala’s chequered past, community members had been “keeping a close eye” on bridging activity. Regular daily withdrawals of exactly 5 million GALA tokens on Ethereum caught their attention, and when attempting to verify their source, corresponding deposit transactions were missing on GalaScan. The group, a representative of which reached out to Protos, flagged the transactions to Gala via Discord on November 6, “tagging the CEO and community moderator.” The group claims that it wasn’t provided with an explanation, but was instead told that the missing bridge transactions may be due to block explorer GalaScan being a “work in progress.” It wasn’t until four days later that Gala took action. During this time, a further 25 million GALA tokens (approximately $250,000) were withdrawn from the Ethereum bridge. Read more: Re7 Labs threatens whistleblower over exposure to yield vault collapse ‘Unauthorized’ withdrawals total 140M GALA Beginning on October 13, 26 withdrawals of 5 million GALA each were made from the bridge almost every day. The recipients were a series of Ethereum addresses which then swapped the tokens for ETH. A further 10 million GALA was then withdrawn on November 10, just hours before the bridge was paused. The bridge’s transaction history downloaded from GalaScan is missing matching bridge transactions on the GalaChain side. Taking the first suspicious withdrawal as an example, which occurred on October 13 at 15:55 UTC, the surrounding transactions of 18,800 and 24,000 GALA are present in the GalaScan data. The 5 million GALA minted on Ethereum, however, has no corresponding deposit transaction on GalaChain. Transactions of… The post Gala quietly changes bridge keys after users flag ‘unauthorized’ withdrawals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Concerned members of the Gala Games community have identified a series of “unauthorized” withdrawals from the GalaChain bridge. Spanning almost a month, between October 13 and November 10, the transfers total 140 million GALA, worth approximately $1.5 million at the time. Given Gala’s chequered past, community members had been “keeping a close eye” on bridging activity. Regular daily withdrawals of exactly 5 million GALA tokens on Ethereum caught their attention, and when attempting to verify their source, corresponding deposit transactions were missing on GalaScan. The group, a representative of which reached out to Protos, flagged the transactions to Gala via Discord on November 6, “tagging the CEO and community moderator.” The group claims that it wasn’t provided with an explanation, but was instead told that the missing bridge transactions may be due to block explorer GalaScan being a “work in progress.” It wasn’t until four days later that Gala took action. During this time, a further 25 million GALA tokens (approximately $250,000) were withdrawn from the Ethereum bridge. Read more: Re7 Labs threatens whistleblower over exposure to yield vault collapse ‘Unauthorized’ withdrawals total 140M GALA Beginning on October 13, 26 withdrawals of 5 million GALA each were made from the bridge almost every day. The recipients were a series of Ethereum addresses which then swapped the tokens for ETH. A further 10 million GALA was then withdrawn on November 10, just hours before the bridge was paused. The bridge’s transaction history downloaded from GalaScan is missing matching bridge transactions on the GalaChain side. Taking the first suspicious withdrawal as an example, which occurred on October 13 at 15:55 UTC, the surrounding transactions of 18,800 and 24,000 GALA are present in the GalaScan data. The 5 million GALA minted on Ethereum, however, has no corresponding deposit transaction on GalaChain. Transactions of…

Gala quietly changes bridge keys after users flag ‘unauthorized’ withdrawals

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Concerned members of the Gala Games community have identified a series of “unauthorized” withdrawals from the GalaChain bridge.

Spanning almost a month, between October 13 and November 10, the transfers total 140 million GALA, worth approximately $1.5 million at the time.

Given Gala’s chequered past, community members had been “keeping a close eye” on bridging activity.

Regular daily withdrawals of exactly 5 million GALA tokens on Ethereum caught their attention, and when attempting to verify their source, corresponding deposit transactions were missing on GalaScan.

The group, a representative of which reached out to Protos, flagged the transactions to Gala via Discord on November 6, “tagging the CEO and community moderator.”

The group claims that it wasn’t provided with an explanation, but was instead told that the missing bridge transactions may be due to block explorer GalaScan being a “work in progress.”

It wasn’t until four days later that Gala took action. During this time, a further 25 million GALA tokens (approximately $250,000) were withdrawn from the Ethereum bridge.

Read more: Re7 Labs threatens whistleblower over exposure to yield vault collapse

‘Unauthorized’ withdrawals total 140M GALA

Beginning on October 13, 26 withdrawals of 5 million GALA each were made from the bridge almost every day. The recipients were a series of Ethereum addresses which then swapped the tokens for ETH.

A further 10 million GALA was then withdrawn on November 10, just hours before the bridge was paused.

The bridge’s transaction history downloaded from GalaScan is missing matching bridge transactions on the GalaChain side.

Taking the first suspicious withdrawal as an example, which occurred on October 13 at 15:55 UTC, the surrounding transactions of 18,800 and 24,000 GALA are present in the GalaScan data.

The 5 million GALA minted on Ethereum, however, has no corresponding deposit transaction on GalaChain.

Transactions of 18,800 and 24,000 GALA are present in the GalaScan data…However, the 5 million GALA minted on Ethereum has no corresponding transaction on GalaChain.

The same pattern was repeated across subsequent daily withdrawals of 5 million GALA each until the bridge was paused.

The group believes these one-sided bridge withdrawals “indicate a likely compromise of privileged access.”

This theory appears supported by the team’s decision to execute a change authorities transaction shortly after pausing the bridge on November 10.

Gala’s response

The group claims that Gala hasn’t publicly disclosed the incident, nor confirmed the cause. Discord announcements about pausing the Ethereum and Solana bridges simply cite “community feedback and concerns.”

Protos has reached out to Gala, but hasn’t heard back before publication of this article. It will be updated in the event we receive a reply.

The incident bears resemblance to a May 2024 hack in which 600 million GALA was sold for $21 million. Gala’s CEO Eric Schiermeyer stated at the time, “We messed up our internal controls… This shouldn’t have happened and we are taking steps to ensure it doesn’t ever again.”

Read more: DeFi karma: Garden hacked for $11M after bridging Lazarus’ loot

The group notes the “similarity between the two incidents, both involving privileged credential misuse, delayed detection, and emergency authority rotation.”

It argues that the pattern of behaviour “suggests ongoing risks to Gala’s infrastructure and token holders.”

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/gala-quietly-changes-bridge-keys-after-users-flag-unauthorized-withdrawals/

Market Opportunity
Gala Logo
Gala Price(GALA)
$0.003031
$0.003031$0.003031
+0.39%
USD
Gala (GALA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Why Cosmetic Boxes Matter for Beauty Brand Growth

Why Cosmetic Boxes Matter for Beauty Brand Growth

If you sell beauty products, you need cosmetic boxes for beauty brands. Many beauty brands spend on formulas but ignore the packaging. A plain or cheap box can
Share
Techbullion2026/03/26 23:04
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
US and UK Set to Seal Landmark Crypto Cooperation Deal

US and UK Set to Seal Landmark Crypto Cooperation Deal

The United States and the United Kingdom are preparing to announce a new agreement on digital assets, with a focus on stablecoins, following high-level talks between senior officials and major industry players.
Share
Cryptodaily2025/09/18 00:49