The post ‘Stablecoins won’t democratize finance’- IMF’s warning puts issuers in focus appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stablecoins are going against one of crypto’s value propositions of “democratizing” finance. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), concentrating stablecoin issuance to top private firms would achieve the opposite of crypto’s main goal.  Source: X The IMF report by Professor Eswar Prasad added,  “Stablecoins are facilitating decentralized finance, but they are the antithesis of decentralization. They don’t rely on decentralized trust mediated by computer code but rather on trust in the institutions that issue them.” U.S. dollar-backed stablecoins vs. others For Prof. Prasad, stablecoins could reinforce the current international monetary system, thereby boosting the dominance of dollar-backed stablecoins.  As of the time of writing, US dollar-based stablecoins, including Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC, collectively command over $303 billion worth of the market supply, or 99.7%.  Source: Artemis Euro-based stablecoins have been growing steadily, currently reaching $617 million. If this momentum continues, they could potentially hit $1 billion by 2026. However, the dominance of U.S. dollar stablecoins might weaken rival currencies such as the Euro and yen, according to Prasad.  Additionally, developing countries with highly inflationary currencies may face significant capital outflows. This occurs as citizens seek more stable and robust alternatives. Standard Chartered estimated the outflows could hit $1 trillion from emerging markets into stablecoins.  However, the Eurozone and China are already pushing for their own versions of digital currencies to protect themselves from U.S. dollar dominance.  However, Noritaka Okabe, CEO of JPYC Co., disagreed with the IMF’s “issuer control” statement. For context, JPYC Co. is Japan’s first regulated yen-based stablecoin for payments and DeFi usage. Okabe said that users directly manage funds via “self-wallets” without intermediary control.  Source: X Stablecoin inflows recover The stablecoin sector has emerged as a breakout use case for cryptocurrency, particularly for faster and more reliable cross-border payments. In July, the U.S government passed… The post ‘Stablecoins won’t democratize finance’- IMF’s warning puts issuers in focus appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stablecoins are going against one of crypto’s value propositions of “democratizing” finance. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), concentrating stablecoin issuance to top private firms would achieve the opposite of crypto’s main goal.  Source: X The IMF report by Professor Eswar Prasad added,  “Stablecoins are facilitating decentralized finance, but they are the antithesis of decentralization. They don’t rely on decentralized trust mediated by computer code but rather on trust in the institutions that issue them.” U.S. dollar-backed stablecoins vs. others For Prof. Prasad, stablecoins could reinforce the current international monetary system, thereby boosting the dominance of dollar-backed stablecoins.  As of the time of writing, US dollar-based stablecoins, including Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC, collectively command over $303 billion worth of the market supply, or 99.7%.  Source: Artemis Euro-based stablecoins have been growing steadily, currently reaching $617 million. If this momentum continues, they could potentially hit $1 billion by 2026. However, the dominance of U.S. dollar stablecoins might weaken rival currencies such as the Euro and yen, according to Prasad.  Additionally, developing countries with highly inflationary currencies may face significant capital outflows. This occurs as citizens seek more stable and robust alternatives. Standard Chartered estimated the outflows could hit $1 trillion from emerging markets into stablecoins.  However, the Eurozone and China are already pushing for their own versions of digital currencies to protect themselves from U.S. dollar dominance.  However, Noritaka Okabe, CEO of JPYC Co., disagreed with the IMF’s “issuer control” statement. For context, JPYC Co. is Japan’s first regulated yen-based stablecoin for payments and DeFi usage. Okabe said that users directly manage funds via “self-wallets” without intermediary control.  Source: X Stablecoin inflows recover The stablecoin sector has emerged as a breakout use case for cryptocurrency, particularly for faster and more reliable cross-border payments. In July, the U.S government passed…

‘Stablecoins won’t democratize finance’- IMF’s warning puts issuers in focus

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Stablecoins are going against one of crypto’s value propositions of “democratizing” finance. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), concentrating stablecoin issuance to top private firms would achieve the opposite of crypto’s main goal. 

Source: X

The IMF report by Professor Eswar Prasad added, 

U.S. dollar-backed stablecoins vs. others

For Prof. Prasad, stablecoins could reinforce the current international monetary system, thereby boosting the dominance of dollar-backed stablecoins. 

As of the time of writing, US dollar-based stablecoins, including Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC, collectively command over $303 billion worth of the market supply, or 99.7%. 

Source: Artemis

Euro-based stablecoins have been growing steadily, currently reaching $617 million. If this momentum continues, they could potentially hit $1 billion by 2026.

However, the dominance of U.S. dollar stablecoins might weaken rival currencies such as the Euro and yen, according to Prasad. 

Additionally, developing countries with highly inflationary currencies may face significant capital outflows. This occurs as citizens seek more stable and robust alternatives.

Standard Chartered estimated the outflows could hit $1 trillion from emerging markets into stablecoins. 

However, the Eurozone and China are already pushing for their own versions of digital currencies to protect themselves from U.S. dollar dominance. 

However, Noritaka Okabe, CEO of JPYC Co., disagreed with the IMF’s “issuer control” statement. For context, JPYC Co. is Japan’s first regulated yen-based stablecoin for payments and DeFi usage.

Okabe said that users directly manage funds via “self-wallets” without intermediary control. 

Source: X

Stablecoin inflows recover

The stablecoin sector has emerged as a breakout use case for cryptocurrency, particularly for faster and more reliable cross-border payments.

In July, the U.S government passed the GENIUS Act to offer clear rules for the road, pushing the market supply to over $300 billion for the first time. 

Between July and September, stablecoins experienced Monthly Inflows of $10 billion to $18 billion, underscoring that regulatory clarity accelerated adoption. Also the November market rout flipped inflows to negative; there was positive momentum in December again. 

Source: DeFiLlama


Final Thoughts

  • For the IMF, stablecoins are innovative but come with a rising risk of issuer trust that could reinforce current U.S dollar dominance. 
  • Stablecoin inflows are back after turning negative in November, signaling renewed crypto activity and adoption.

Next: Why Ethereum strengthens despite whale selling – Inside Asia premium twist

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/stablecoins-wont-democratize-finance-imfs-warning-puts-issuers-in-focus/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.006207
$0.006207$0.006207
-0.52%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.