On Monday, Bitcoin (BTC) appeared to be emerging from the downtrend in force since the all-time high back in October. However, it wasn’t to be. Yet another rejection means the downtrend persists. Is this just a case of the bulls having to remain patient, or could a major breakdown still take place?On Monday, Bitcoin (BTC) appeared to be emerging from the downtrend in force since the all-time high back in October. However, it wasn’t to be. Yet another rejection means the downtrend persists. Is this just a case of the bulls having to remain patient, or could a major breakdown still take place?

BTC Fails to Break Out (Again): Bearish Confirmation or Final Shakeout?

2025/12/09 18:23

On Monday, Bitcoin (BTC) appeared to be emerging from the downtrend in force since the all-time high back in October. However, it wasn’t to be. Yet another rejection means the downtrend persists. Is this just a case of the bulls having to remain patient, or could a major breakdown still take place?

Bears force the $BTC price back under the trendline

Source: TradingView

The 4-hour time frame shows how the $BTC price emerged from the downtrend line on Monday, but also how a strong red candle took the price back beneath later in the day. The bulls are certainly pounding against the downtrend, and the probabilities are that they will break through definitively at some point - and that should be within the next several days.

It can also be seen that a clear ascending channel has formed, which could help to guide the price higher. If the bears do throw another wrench into the works, the bottom of the channel, as well as the major ascending trendline, would likely provide good support.

So now it’s a case of waiting for that eventual breakout, or the possibility of a stronger rejection that takes the price back down to the major trendline. Time is counting down for either scenario to take place.

Price reaching the end of giant falling wedge

Source: TradingView

The daily chart allows one to observe the large falling wedge that the price is within. While this wedge is not as long timewise as the 8-month bull flag from March to December 2024 (204 days compared with 237), it is still huge, and is much bigger than the previous wedge.

It can be seen in the chart that the price is unlikely to come down to the full extent of the wedge given that the major ascending trendline cuts off the last part of it, and the price has been respecting this so far. However, if the price falls through the major trendline, the rest of the wedge comes into play.

At the bottom of the chart, the RSI reveals that the indicator line is traversing up nicely from the bottom. An ascending trendline is taking shape, and the bulls will be hoping that the price continues to bounce from it.

$BTC about to break out of third huge pattern

Source: TradingView

The weekly time frame illustrates the three major bullish patterns so far in this bull market. The long bull flag, followed by two big falling wedge patterns. Is there another big pattern still to come? Or could it all end here as the price falls through the major trendline and out of the bottom of the current falling wedge?

The probabilities are in favour of the bulls here. It would take a huge black swan to send Bitcoin down and into a bear market from this position. As things stand, the likelihood is that the price does break out to the upside, and possibly rises all the way back to retest the 8-year trendline. Beyond this, nothing is certain. This could either become the blow-off top, or the bull market could continue on if the price breaks through.

At the bottom of the chart, the MACD reveals that the blue indicator line is starting to curve into a more gentle descent, while the pink histogram bars are continuing to reduce in size. The trend is changing.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The U.S. OCC has warned Wall Street about the "de-banking" of industries such as digital assets, calling such practices "illegal."

The U.S. OCC has warned Wall Street about the "de-banking" of industries such as digital assets, calling such practices "illegal."

PANews reported on December 11th, citing CoinDesk, that President Trump's actions against the "debanking" of controversial industries such as digital assets have prompted the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to release a new report. The report further confirms past practices and warns that banks suspected of involvement could face penalties. This brief OCC report reviewed nine of the largest national banks in the United States, concluding that "between 2020 and 2023, these banks developed public and private policies that restricted certain industries from accessing banking services, including requiring escalating reviews and approvals before providing financial services." The report states that some large banks set higher barriers to entry for controversial or environmentally sensitive businesses, or activities that contradict the banks' own values. Financial giants such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citigroup are highlighted, with links to their past public policies, particularly those concerning environmental issues. The report states, "The OCC intends to pursue accountability for any illegal 'debanking' activities by these banks, including referring related cases to the Attorney General." However, it remains unclear which specific laws these activities may have violated.
Share
PANews2025/12/11 09:04