PANews reported on December 13th that OKX issued a statement on its X platform stating that it had discovered conclusive evidence that multiple interconnected andPANews reported on December 13th that OKX issued a statement on its X platform stating that it had discovered conclusive evidence that multiple interconnected and

OKX: Evidence of manipulation of OM prices has been found; evidence has been submitted to regulators and legal proceedings have been initiated.

2025/12/13 11:43

PANews reported on December 13th that OKX issued a statement on its X platform stating that it had discovered conclusive evidence that multiple interconnected and colluding accounts used a large amount of OM as collateral to borrow a large amount of USDT, artificially inflating the price of OM. OKX's risk team correctly flagged this abnormal activity, contacted the account holders, and requested them to take corrective action, but they refused to cooperate. To control the risk, OKX took over these linked accounts. Shortly afterward, the price of OM plummeted. OKX only liquidated a small amount of OM, but the sharp price drop still resulted in substantial losses, all of which were borne by the OKX Security Fund.

Furthermore, multiple third-party analyses indicate that the price crash was primarily triggered by perpetual contract trading outside the OKX platform. The OKX Security Fund operates entirely as designed. OKX has submitted all evidence and documents to regulatory and law enforcement agencies. Several lawsuits and legal proceedings are currently underway.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09