Willy Woo has weighed in on the threat posed to Bitcoin by quantum computing, posting on X that the OG crypto would likely survive, albeit after a significant andWilly Woo has weighed in on the threat posed to Bitcoin by quantum computing, posting on X that the OG crypto would likely survive, albeit after a significant and

Willy Woo Weighs In as Quantum Hack Fears Target Satoshi’s Bitcoin Stash

2025/12/15 12:50
  • Willy Woo has responded to claims by YouTuber Josh Otten that quantum computers could potentially break Bitcoin’s encryption, allowing hackers to access Satoshi’s wallet and sending the OG crypto as low as US$3.
  • Woo argued that if this were to happen, many people would step in to buy the enormous dip and the network would survive — he also pointed out many wallets wouldn’t be vulnerable to this kind of attack.
  • Fears over quantum computing’s impact on Bitcoin have been growing recently as tech advances begin to accelerate.

What happens if/when someone builds a powerful quantum computer capable of hacking Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin wallet holding almost 1.1 million BTC? The issue was debated on X last week after YouTuber Josh Otten argued that such a situation could see Bitcoin’s price fall to as low as US$3 (AU$4.50).

Otten said he believes a powerful quantum computer capable of breaking Bitcoin’s private keys could trigger such a collapse.

“If a functional Quantum Computer is built, it could use Shor’s algorithm to crack the encryption guarding Bitcoin’s earliest wallets,” Otten claimed. 

This would expose the private keys to Satoshi Nakamoto’s fortune, likely crashing the market and destroying trust in the whole system.

Josh Otten, ‘Ordinary Things’ YouTube Channel

However, Bitcoin influencer Willy Woo doubted even this catastrophic scenario could destroy Bitcoin permanently. “Many OGs would be in to buy the flash crash,” Woo wrote.

BTC network would survive, most coins are not immediately vulnerable.

Willy Woo, Bitcoin analyst

While not all Bitcoin wallets would be vulnerable to precisely this kind of quantum computing attack, around 4 million early wallets, including Satoshi’s, would be. These early wallets, known as pay-to-public-key (P2PK), reveal the wallet’s full public key each time a payment is made. 

Using a quantum computer, a wallet’s private key could theoretically be determined from its public key. Once an attacker has a wallet’s private key, they would be able to sign transactions on the wallet and steal all the Bitcoin.

Woo said that while this scenario wouldn’t necessarily spell the end for Bitcoin, it would result in a “many year shakeout.”

More recent Bitcoin wallets aren’t as vulnerable to this kind of attack because they don’t expose their full public keys each time they send a transaction — if a quantum attacker doesn’t know a public key, they can’t determine the associated private key.

Related: Is there Meat in the Quantum-Crypto Collision?

Q-Day Imminent? Early Bitcoin Dev Not Convinced of Quantum Threat

As advances are made in quantum computing, fears are growing in the crypto community that the encryption many networks rely on could soon be broken, essentially rendering them useless. 

So-called ‘Q-Day’ — the day that quantum computers become capable of cracking current encryption algorithms — had long been considered a distant concern, but rapid progress by firms such as Rigetti and Quantinuum has some saying the time line may have shrunk to as little as just 2-3 years.

Solana’s co-founder, Anatoly Yakovenko, put the chances of Q-Day occurring in the next 5 years at 50% in comments he made earlier this year.

Related: Bitcoin Won’t Face Quantum Threat for Decades, Says Adam Back

Not everyone is convinced that quantum computers pose a huge, short-term threat to crypto. Adam Back, the early Bitcoin developer and founder of Bitcoin adjacent firm Blockstream, believes any threat posed to Bitcoin by quantum computing remains decades away.

In a comment on X from November, Back explained he thinks the threat won’t be serious for at least 20 to 40 years. He also believes the Bitcoin network will be able to be strengthened against this threat well before it poses anything like an existential risk to the network.

“There are quantum secure signatures, NIST standardized SLH-DSA last year,” Back said. “Bitcoin can add over time, as the evaluation continues and be quantum ready, long before cryptographically relevant quantum computers arrive.”

The post Willy Woo Weighs In as Quantum Hack Fears Target Satoshi’s Bitcoin Stash appeared first on Crypto News Australia.

Market Opportunity
Wootrade Network Logo
Wootrade Network Price(WOO)
$0.02396
$0.02396$0.02396
-2.52%
USD
Wootrade Network (WOO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41