The post Meta’s China ad engine earmarked more than $3B from fraudulent scam ads appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Meta faced a grim truth last year when it The post Meta’s China ad engine earmarked more than $3B from fraudulent scam ads appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Meta faced a grim truth last year when it

Meta’s China ad engine earmarked more than $3B from fraudulent scam ads

2025/12/16 00:29

Meta faced a grim truth last year when it found that Chinese advertisers were pumping Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp with harmful ads that targeted users across the world.

Typically, China does not allow its own citizens to use these platforms, but Beijing lets Chinese companies market to foreign audiences, which turned the country into a major cash source for Meta, pushing its 2024 ad revenue from the country past $18 billion.

According to Reuters, around 19% of that money came from ads tied to scams, illegal gambling, porn, and banned products.

Documents allegedly showed staff warning leaders about the scale of abuse, with one from April 2024 saying, “We need to make significant investment to reduce growing harm.”

The documents also said China was behind a quarter of all scam ads on Meta platforms, with victims ranging from Taiwan shoppers buying fake supplements to U.S. and Canadian investors losing savings to fraud schemes.

Meta is changing its enforcement approach on China

Meta created a new anti-fraud team in 2024 to deal with the mess, as staff cut the share of banned China ads from 19% to 9% in the second half of the year. That move did not last.

After what internal files described as “follow-up from Zuck,” Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg told teams to pause the crackdown. The company then disbanded the China task force, lifted a freeze on approving new Chinese ad agencies and shelved several enforcement steps that tests had shown would work.

Consultants from Propellerfish also told Meta its own policies were helping scammers. Still, within months, new Chinese agencies were back flooding the system.

By mid-2025, banned ads hit 16% of China’s revenue again. Former Meta integrity chief Rob Leathern said, “The levels that you’re talking about are not defensible. I don’t know how anyone could think this is okay.”

Spokesperson Andy Stone told Reuters that the fraud team was always temporary and that Zuckerberg ordered teams to “redouble efforts” worldwide. Stone said Meta’s automated tools blocked or removed 46 million China-submitted ads over 18 months and that Meta had cut ties with some Chinese partners and lowered commissions for others who pushed too many violations.

He added, “Scams are spiking across the internet, driven by persistent criminals and sophisticated, organized crime syndicates constantly evolving their schemes to evade detection.”

Chinese ad networks drive global scams on Meta

Reuters says that Meta expected $16 billion of its 2024 revenue to come from scam and banned ads. Two U.S. senators later asked regulators to investigate. Inside the company, China was labeled the top “Scam Exporting Nation.” Staff even noted that global scam rates drop during China’s “Golden Week” holiday.

U.S. prosecutors in Illinois said in March 2025 that the FBI seized $214 million from a Chinese stock scheme that used Meta ads to funnel victims into WhatsApp groups run by people “posing as U.S.-based investment advisors.” Seven people from Taiwan and Malaysia were charged.

A big part of the problem is Meta’s China reseller network: 11 top-tier agencies that recruit smaller agencies, creating layers of intermediaries.

A Propellerfish report claims that there is widespread fake accounts, identity-masking tools, AI-generated documents, and “ad optimization specialists” funded by informal lenders. The report said China’s government does not intervene “when violations target overseas audiences,” meaning fraudsters face “little or no risk.”

Meta’s enforcement was described as weaker than TikTok and Google. Internal files said Meta would not aim for full parity with global standards but would instead maintain its current level of “global harm” from China.

For under $30, paid in crypto, they bought access to accounts from second-tier agencies linked to top partners like GatherOne and Cheetah Mobile. They then placed get-rich-quick investment ads, which ran with no resistance and drew dozens of responses. After questions, Meta removed its public directory of “Badged Partners.”

Internal data said China ad revenue more than doubled from $7.4 billion in 2022 to $18.4 billion in 2024. By late 2024, half of the $240 million coming from newly verified Chinese resellers violated rules. Staff built dashboards and resumed a moratorium on new verifications.

Meta also found that more than half of ads run by Beijing Tengze Technology broke its rules. Instead of cutting the company, Meta charged it more. Chinese records later showed Tengze shut down, and its listed address did not exist. Its owner, Lin Zedun, also controls Shenzhen Fugaoda, which had vanished from its office after missed rent but later posted job ads for people with experience selling “small black goods” in Europe and America.

In early 2025, Meta adjusted commissions for Chinese agencies based on ad quality. But behavior did not change. A May 2025 review showed 800 accounts generated $28 million in violating ads in one month. More than 75% of spending came from accounts backed by partner protections. One worker asked whether Meta planned to penalize high-spending partners. Another answered no because “the revenue impact is too high.”

Staff proposed shutting down a small group of accounts responsible for $2.8 million in harmful ads each month.

Before doing so, they asked if growth teams would object “given the revenue impact.” The internal document ended with a blunt line: “It’s likely the revenue will return.”

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/meta-china-3b-from-fraudulent-scam-ads/

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.004026
$0.004026$0.004026
-0.78%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41