TLDR: XRP’s monthly trend ribbon historically marked shifts into bearish momentum with 50%+ declines following. The 2018 crash saw 65% losses while 2022 droppedTLDR: XRP’s monthly trend ribbon historically marked shifts into bearish momentum with 50%+ declines following. The 2018 crash saw 65% losses while 2022 dropped

Is XRP at Risk of a 50%+ Decline Like Past Cycles?

TLDR:

  • XRP’s monthly trend ribbon historically marked shifts into bearish momentum with 50%+ declines following.
  • The 2018 crash saw 65% losses while 2022 dropped 54%, suggesting each cycle shows improving resilience.
  • XRP spot ETFs attracted over $1.1 billion in inflows while Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs bled capital.
  • Price currently consolidates above $1.80-$2.00 support, but analysts warn a breakdown targets $1.10.

XRP trades dangerously close to losing its monthly trend ribbon, a technical breakdown that historically preceded catastrophic declines. 

In 2018 and 2022, similar losses of this key support level triggered drops of 65% and 54% respectively. The asset now faces a critical test that could determine whether history repeats itself.

Market analysts remain divided on whether XRP will follow its established pattern or break free from past cycles.

Technical indicators suggest vulnerability, yet institutional money flows paint a starkly different picture. This divergence leaves traders questioning which signal will prove decisive in the weeks ahead.

Technical Warnings Echo Previous Market Tops

Trader Steph_iscrypto identifies the monthly trend ribbon as XRP’s most reliable long-term momentum indicator. 

The ribbon functions as a clear dividing line between bullish and bearish regimes across multiple cycles. When price trades above this level, bullish momentum typically persists without major interruption.

The 2018 breakdown marked the beginning of XRP’s most severe bear market on record. Once the trend ribbon flipped negative, sellers dominated for months as the asset shed 65% of its value. 

A similar pattern emerged in 2022 when another loss of this support triggered a 54% decline.

However, Steph_iscrypto notes that XRP currently remains above the ribbon, which continues expanding upward in green. 

The consolidation above $1.80-$2.00 represents absorption rather than distribution if this analysis holds. Ali Charts counters this optimism by declaring support already broken, with $1.10 emerging as the next logical target.

Institutional Flows Contradict Bearish Setup

X Finance Bull presents evidence that challenges the bearish technical case against XRP. Since spot ETF launches, the asset has attracted over $1.1 billion in consistent inflows despite choppy conditions. 

This capital migration occurred while Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs experienced notable outflows during the same stretch.

The disconnect between declining prices and rising institutional accumulation often signals professional positioning ahead of reversals. 

Sophisticated investors typically buy weakness rather than chase strength, using technical selloffs as entry opportunities. The sustained nine-figure inflows suggest major players view current levels as attractive accumulation zones.

Past cycles showed progressively smaller corrections, indicating structural improvement in XRP’s market foundation. 

The 2018 drop of 65% gave way to a 54% decline in 2022, suggesting each cycle builds greater resilience. If this pattern continues, any potential correction may prove less severe than historical precedents.

The critical question centers on whether price will follow institutional flows or technical patterns will override bullish capital movement. 

Monthly closes above the trend ribbon would invalidate bearish scenarios and confirm continued strength. Conversely, a confirmed breakdown below this level could trigger the third major correction cycle in XRP’s history.

The post Is XRP at Risk of a 50%+ Decline Like Past Cycles? appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1.868
$1.868$1.868
+0.25%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Rappler's Dwight de Leon recaps the challenges faced in 2025 by one of the Philippines' wealthiest families
Share
Rappler2025/12/25 09:00
Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

The post Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NVIDIA has agreed to pay approximately $20 billion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 09:16