The following is a guest post and opinion from Anurag Arjun, Founder of Avail. The global stablecoin narrative is about to shift fast. What began as a US-dominatedThe following is a guest post and opinion from Anurag Arjun, Founder of Avail. The global stablecoin narrative is about to shift fast. What began as a US-dominated

Asia is quietly building a counterweight to the dollar stablecoin empire, and the West isn’t ready

The following is a guest post and opinion from Anurag Arjun, Founder of Avail.

The global stablecoin narrative is about to shift fast. What began as a US-dominated experiment in digital liquidity is morphing into a multipolar fight over who controls the rails of tomorrow’s monetary system. And the most consequential moves are unfolding in Asia—quietly, deliberately, and at increasing speed.

For a decade, dollar-backed tokens (such as USDT and USDC) have dominated the market. But 2025 is the year that the reign begins to crack. Behind closed doors in Seoul, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Jakarta, a different plan is being built: stablecoins pegged to local currencies, issued under regulated frameworks, and designed for regional commerce, remittances, gaming, and ultimately, financial sovereignty.

If the West remains fixated on the next U.S. stablecoin bill, Asia is scrambling to build a stablecoin empire of its own.

Why 2025 is the Turning Point

Because the changes are concrete, regulatory, and structural—not speculative.

In Hong Kong, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) passed a landmark Stablecoins Ordinance in May 2025. As of August 1, any entity issuing fiat-referenced stablecoins or marketing a stablecoin pegged to HKD must have a license from the HKMA, abide by reserve and redemption regulations, and undergo AML/auditing oversight. The licensing race has begun in earnest. Dozens of firms—from fintechs to banks to Web3 companies—are reported to be preparing applications, all vying to become early-licensed issuers. But the real inflection point is not just regulatory. It’s strategic.

Global firms are finally realizing they cannot build a worldwide business on USD-only rails without alienating major markets.

Exchanges, payment apps, Web3 gaming companies, and fintechs operating across Asia have started to understand the risk:

  • A USD-only offering signals misalignment with local regulators.
  • It caps user adoption in markets where domestic currencies dominate on-the-ground commerce.
  • It creates dependency on U.S. regulatory and banking bottlenecks.
  • It limits participation in Asia’s fast-emerging digital payment ecosystems.

Asia isn’t rejecting the dollar outright. It’s building alternatives—quietly and with increasing coordination.

What Asia Is Building Instead

Hong Kong is only the start.

South Korea is now in the advanced stages of developing a legal framework for won-pegged stablecoins, with regulators preparing legislation for submission by the end of 2025, and debates intensifying over the distinction between bank- and non-bank-issued stablecoins and their respective oversight. Major financial institutions and tech firms are already positioning ahead of formal rules.

Japan is embracing stablecoin innovation on both the institutional and private fronts: its largest banks are collaborating on stablecoin initiatives for corporate settlements, while private yen-pegged tokens such as JPYC operate under a clear regulatory framework and are gaining traction.

Singapore continues to support digital payment tokens and multi-currency stablecoin infrastructure under a calibrated, compliance-first framework that emphasizes risk controls and regulatory standards.

See, what’s emerging in Asia isn’t just a collection of local stablecoins. It’s the early formation of an alternative settlement layer—one that reduces reliance on U.S.-centric banking rails, correspondent networks, and dollar-clearing choke points. Digital trade corridors are the endgame.

This is where Western narratives begin to fall apart.

In the U.S., the debate remains stuck on how to regulate dollar-backed stablecoins domestically. In Asia, the question is already more advanced: how should digital currencies move between jurisdictions, under whose rules, and on whose terms?

That is not a crypto question.
It is a geopolitical one.

Meanwhile in Europe… A Late Awakening

Europe’s response adds another twist. In Europe, a consortium of major banks, including ING, UniCredit, and BNP Paribas, formed a company named Qivalis. The emergence of Qivalis (a euro-backed, bank-controlled stablecoin set for 2026) is being spun as a response to U.S. dominance.

Wrong.

It’s a response to Asian acceleration.

Europe doesn’t want a future where the two major non-EU digital currencies are:

  • USD stablecoins, and
  • Asia’s new wave of regulated FX stablecoins.

For the first time, Europe is being pulled into a currency-rail arms race it did not expect to fight.

These developments show that stablecoins are no longer niche digital assets. They are being woven into the future fabric of regulated, sovereign, or supra-sovereign money systems.

Stablecoins Are Becoming State-Adjacent

New research focus and hybrid monetary systems—combining CBDCs + stablecoins—signal where this is all going:

Stablecoins are becoming state-adjacent. Not anti-state. Not post-state.
But parallel-state financial tools.

And this is where the questions get uncomfortable:

  • What happens when a KRW or JPY stablecoin becomes more trusted in Southeast Asia than local fiat?
  • What happens when a Singapore-approved multi-currency stablecoin becomes the de facto settlement asset for APAC regional trade?
  • What happens when Western regulators realize they’ve lost the narrative they thought they controlled?
  • What does “dollar dominance” mean when the world’s liquidity moves through programmable, multi-currency rails that no single country controls?
  • What happens when USD stablecoins become just one option—not the default?

These are not hypothetical questions anymore.
They are emerging realities, forming in slow motion, while geopolitical institutions pretend this is still “crypto.”

The Shift Is Already Underway

Asia isn’t racing to build stablecoins. Asia is racing to build strategic monetary optionality.

And the West is still arguing over definitions.

That distinction matters.

The future of stablecoins will not be won by the loudest protocol or the largest issuer, but by the jurisdictions that design credible, regulated, interoperable currency rails first. In that race, Asia is already several steps ahead.

And by the time the shift becomes obvious, the rules of digital money may have already been rewritten with a logic that America did not write.

The post Asia is quietly building a counterweight to the dollar stablecoin empire, and the West isn’t ready appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.009168
$0.009168$0.009168
+6.55%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates

Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates

The post Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Federal Reserve on Wednesday opted to ease interest rates for the first time in months, leading the way for potentially lower mortgage rates, bond yields and a likely boost to cryptocurrency over the coming weeks. Average long-term mortgage rates dropped to their lowest levels in months ahead of the central bank’s policy shift. Copyright{2018} The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Key Facts The central bank’s policymaking panel voted this week to lower interest rates, which have sat between 4.25% and 4.5% since December, to a new range of 4% and 4.25%. How Will Lower Interest Rates Impact Mortgage Rates? Mortgage rates tend to fall before and during a period of interest rate cuts: The average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage dropped to 6.35% from 6.5% last week, the lowest level since October 2024, mortgage buyer Freddie Mac reported. Borrowing costs on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages also dropped to 5.5% from 5.6% as they neared the year-ago rate of 5.27%. When the Federal Reserve lowered the funds rate to between 0% and 0.25% during the pandemic, 30-year mortgage rates hit record lows between 2.7% and 3% by the end of 2020, according to data published by Freddie Mac. Consumers who refinanced their mortgages in 2020 saved about $5.3 billion annually as rates dropped, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Similarly, mortgage rates spiked around 7% as interest rates were hiked in 2022 and 2023, though mortgage rates appeared to react within weeks of the Fed opting to cut or raise rates. How Do Treasury Bonds Respond To Lower Interest Rates? Long-term Treasury yields are more directly influenced by interest rates, as lower rates tend to result in lower yields. When the Fed pushed rates to near zero during the pandemic, 10-year Treasury yields fell to an all-time low of 0.5%. As…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:59
Two new wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC from Binance within 12 hours, worth $13.5 million.

Two new wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC from Binance within 12 hours, worth $13.5 million.

PANews reported on December 28 that, according to Lookonchain monitoring, two newly created wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC (US$13.5 million) from Binance in the past
Share
PANews2025/12/28 09:13
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30