The Truebit Protocol hack drained 8,535 ETH, erased $26M, and sent the TRU token from $0.16 to near zero in hours. The crypto market faced a major shock today asThe Truebit Protocol hack drained 8,535 ETH, erased $26M, and sent the TRU token from $0.16 to near zero in hours. The crypto market faced a major shock today as

$26,000,000 Lost: Truebit Exploit Drains 8,535 ETH and Triggers Total TRU Token Collapse

The Truebit Protocol hack drained 8,535 ETH, erased $26M, and sent the TRU token from $0.16 to near zero in hours.

The crypto market faced a major shock today as the Truebit Protocol suffered a hack.

This hack wiped out millions in assets and sent the platform’s native token to zero. Investors watched in disbelief as one of Ethereum’s infrastructure projects suffered a catastrophic failure. 

In all, this incident marks one of the biggest security failures of 2026 so far.

Details of the Truebit Protocol Hack

The crypto community was first alerted by early reports from security firm Cyvers, when suspicious on-chain activity first appeared. 

A single wallet address suddenly received 8,535 ETH tokens. At current market rates, this haul is worth roughly $26 million. The platform later confirmed that a malicious actor targeted a specific smart contract address.

The attacker did not just take the money and run. They used a builder bribe to speed up their transactions. This made sure that their trades went through before the team could pause the system. 

By the time the alarm sounded, the damage was already done and the stolen funds were quickly moved to different wallets to hide the trail.

How the Attacker Exploited the System

Research from blockchain experts like PeckShield shows that the hacker found a hole in an old smart contract.

This flaw lived in the minting function of the protocol and allowed the attacker to buy TRU tokens at zero cost. 

Essentially, they printed money out of thin air.

Once they had these free tokens, they sold them back into the protocol’s liquidity pools.

This process drained the Ether stored in those pools and the attacker repeated this buy-and-sell cycle to maximise the theft. 

TRU Token Price Crashes to Near Zero

The market reaction to the hack was instant and brutal. Before the news broke, the TRU token traded steadily around $0.16. Within hours, the price plummeted by 100%.

Data from CoinGecko showed the token hitting record lows near $0.00000001.

Panic selling took hold as news of the $26 million loss spread. Most investors tried to exit their positions at once, and this caused liquidity on decentralised exchanges to dry up almost immediately. 

Many holders found themselves stuck with worthless tokens they could no longer sell.

Security Teams Identify the Culprit

Investigators linked the attacker to a previous incident involving the Sparkle protocol.

That attack happened only 12 days ago and it seems the same person or group is actively hunting for weak smart contracts. 

The Truebit team issued a statement advising the public to stay away from the affected contract.

They are now working with law enforcement to track the 8,535 ETH. However, recovering funds from a decentralised exploit is often very difficult.

Relates Reading: BlackRock dumps $276M in BTC and $83M in ETH amid market downturn

A Wake-Up Call for DeFi Security

This event serves as a reminder of the risks in defi. Even established projects can have hidden bugs in their code. The hack thus shows that one small mistake can destroy years of work. 

It also shows how quickly trust can vanish in the crypto space.

Other platforms are now on high alert. Many are reviewing their own old contracts for similar minting flaws. Real-time monitoring proved useful here, as Cyvers caught the anomaly early. 

However, even with fast alerts, the speed of the blockchain makes it hard to stop a determined thief.

The post $26,000,000 Lost: Truebit Exploit Drains 8,535 ETH and Triggers Total TRU Token Collapse appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15