The bipartisan Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act would exempt non-custodial crypto developers from money transmitter rules, aiming to cut legal risk and keep The bipartisan Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act would exempt non-custodial crypto developers from money transmitter rules, aiming to cut legal risk and keep

Lummis–Wyden bill shields non-custodial crypto devs from money transmitter rules

The bipartisan Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act would exempt non-custodial crypto developers from money transmitter rules, aiming to cut legal risk and keep builders in the U.S.

Summary
  • Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden introduced the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act to clarify that non-custodial developers are not money transmitters.​
  • The bill protects activities like writing code, maintaining decentralized networks, and building self-custody tools when developers lack unilateral control over user assets.​
  • Industry groups say clearer lines between infrastructure builders and intermediaries could reduce criminal liability fears and stem the outflow of projects overseas.​

Two U.S. senators introduced bipartisan legislation on January 12, 2026, aimed at providing regulatory clarity for cryptocurrency developers by exempting non-custodial builders from money transmitter licensing requirements.

Lummis-Wyden bill to protect non-custodial crypto developers

Senators Cynthia Lummis, a Republican, and Ron Wyden, a Democrat, proposed the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act to address regulatory uncertainty facing developers in the digital asset sector, according to statements from the lawmakers.

The bill seeks to exempt cryptocurrency developers who do not process or control user funds from federal and state money transmitter rules. Under the proposed legislation, creating computer software, writing code, or maintaining blockchain networks would not generate licensing obligations.

The measure defines developers who lack unilateral control over assets as non-money transmitters, establishing a legal distinction between infrastructure development and custodial financial activity. Protected activities would include blockchain software development, maintenance of decentralized networks, self-custody tools, and infrastructure services.

Senator Lummis stated that developers have faced regulatory threats despite having no custody roles, arguing that money transmitter classifications restrict innovation without reducing money laundering risks. Senator Wyden cited privacy and free speech concerns, stating that applying rules designed for exchanges to code writers reflects a misunderstanding of the technology.

Blockchain developers have raised concerns about potential criminal liability for third-party use of their software, according to industry observers. Some projects have relocated operations overseas to reduce regulatory risk, the senators noted.

The legislation represents a response to increased enforcement actions involving non-custodial protocols that have alarmed developers in recent years. The bipartisan sponsorship reflects uncommon alignment on cryptocurrency policy between the two major parties.

The bill currently stands as standalone legislation in the Senate but may be incorporated into broader market structure proposals, according to congressional sources. Negotiations on final legislative packaging continue.

Industry participants have expressed support for clearer distinctions between developers and financial intermediaries, stating the bill could reduce compliance uncertainty and encourage domestic blockchain development. Proponents say the proposal aims to preserve U.S. competitiveness in digital finance by retaining talent and investment.

The legislation does not restrict regulation of cryptocurrency exchanges or brokers. Senator Wyden emphasized that enforcement of tax and trading rules would continue, noting the bill is intended to narrow regulatory scope rather than weaken oversight.

The measure reflects the principle of technology neutrality, with lawmakers stating regulation should focus on function rather than code creation, consistent with previous internet policy approaches.

The bill’s future depends on broader Senate negotiations, but its introduction signals lawmakers’ willingness to update regulatory frameworks for emerging financial technologies.

Market Opportunity
The AI Prophecy Logo
The AI Prophecy Price(ACT)
$0.02475
$0.02475$0.02475
0.00%
USD
The AI Prophecy (ACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50