TLDR South Korea’s leading crypto exchanges have opposed the proposed cap on major shareholder stakes. The Digital Asset Exchange Alliance stated that the ownershipTLDR South Korea’s leading crypto exchanges have opposed the proposed cap on major shareholder stakes. The Digital Asset Exchange Alliance stated that the ownership

Crypto Exchanges in South Korea Slam Proposed Shareholder Cap Rule

TLDR

  • South Korea’s leading crypto exchanges have opposed the proposed cap on major shareholder stakes.
  • The Digital Asset Exchange Alliance stated that the ownership cap could harm industry growth and user trust.
  • The Financial Services Commission suggested limiting ownership to between 15% and 20%.
  • DAXA argued that such a move would weaken accountability and disrupt private business operations.
  • The alliance warned that strict ownership rules might push users toward overseas platforms.

South Korea’s largest digital asset exchanges have opposed the government’s plan to limit major shareholder stakes, calling it disruptive, unnecessary, and damaging to market development, according to a statement issued by their representative alliance.

DAXA Criticizes FSC’s Ownership Proposal

The Digital Asset Exchange Alliance (DAXA) released a joint statement pushing back against the Financial Services Commission’s (FSC) proposed 15%–20% ownership cap. The group warned that such limitations would disrupt the current exchange ecosystem and harm investor confidence in the country’s digital asset sector.

DAXA, which includes Upbit, Bithumb, Korbit, Coinone, and Gopax, stated that imposing caps on ownership would undermine private business operations. The alliance believes the proposed cap could “impede the growth” of the domestic crypto market and limit the competitiveness of local firms.

The FSC introduced the proposal earlier this month as part of new governance measures being drafted under the upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act. The legislation is expected to finalize within the first quarter of 2026, forming part of South Korea’s second major regulatory framework for digital assets.

South Korea Exchanges Reject Ownership Cap Proposal

DAXA argued that artificially changing ownership structures would weaken accountability and disrupt investor protections across the crypto industry. “Major shareholders carry final responsibility for user assets,” the group said, warning that forced stake reductions could remove clear accountability.

The alliance also expressed concerns that such a cap could trigger capital flight and shift user trust to offshore exchanges. Exchanges noted that crypto markets differ from traditional finance and operate without borders, unlike securities.

They stressed that local investors and developers need a supportive environment, especially as South Korea prepares to expand its digital economy.

The proposal follows recent ownership changes among key exchanges, which have sparked debate about industry concentration. Upbit is set to merge with Naver Financial, while Mirae Asset is in talks to acquire Korbit.

Exchanges Call for Policy Reconsideration

DAXA requested that authorities reconsider the plan and focus on supporting a transparent, globally aligned regulatory approach.

Exchanges believe policies should balance investor safety with innovation and market growth rather than limit company structure. They emphasized the need to maintain consistency and predictability for operators and shareholders.

The Digital Asset Basic Act is also expected to introduce new rules for won-pegged stablecoins and spot crypto ETFs. These upcoming regulations will shape South Korea’s next phase of crypto oversight starting this year.

The post Crypto Exchanges in South Korea Slam Proposed Shareholder Cap Rule appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Capverse Logo
Capverse Price(CAP)
$0.1329
$0.1329$0.1329
-0.63%
USD
Capverse (CAP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50