The post Why ‘Stranger Things’ Would Have Been So Much Better Without Vecna appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stranger Things Credit: Netflix Unsurprisingly,The post Why ‘Stranger Things’ Would Have Been So Much Better Without Vecna appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stranger Things Credit: Netflix Unsurprisingly,

Why ‘Stranger Things’ Would Have Been So Much Better Without Vecna

Stranger Things

Credit: Netflix

Unsurprisingly, I received a bit of pushback to my recent post about the main culprit behind the decline of Stranger Things. I argued at the time that while there were many problems with both Season 4 and especially Season 5, many of these can be traced back to Vecna and how the addition of a fantasy Big Bad fundamentally altered the series for the worse.

One counter-argument I’ve heard from fans is that it actually makes perfect sense to introduce a Dark Lord figure in Stranger Things, since this is a show based on Dungeons & Dragons and that game pretty heavily influenced by The Lord of the Rings. In fantasy, of course, a Dark Lord is pretty common, whether that’s Sauron or Voldemort or The Dark One from The Wheel Of Time. Dark Lords are everywhere in fantasy.

The television version of Game Of Thrones introduced its own Dark Lord in the ominous Night King, which is a pretty significant departure from the books by George R.R. Martin. Naturally, the Night King ended up being a rather lackluster Big Bad in the end.

That’s one trouble with Dark Lord archetypes. They’re built up to be these impossibly deadly and evil and cunning foes, and then our much less impressive heroes manage to take them down through grit and determination or just dumb luck.

Sauron was bested by some filthy Hobbitses and their pal, Gollum. Voldemort would have gotten away with conquering Middle-earth if it weren’t for those meddling kids. (The Vecna/Voldemort similarities are actually pretty hilarious). The Night King was built up over seven seasons, with the nightmarish Long Night perpetually on the horizon and an army of the living dead poised to roll across Westeros . . . and then Arya Stark just stabbed him to death out of the blue. I guess “Stick ‘em with the pointy end” was Chekhov’s Gun, after all.

Game of Thrones

Credit: HBO

The same problem arises in Hawkins, Indiana. The Dark Lord, Vecna, has been set up as this super powerful, evil otherworldly necromancer about to literally destroy the world, and we get one of the most lackluster boss fights ever, despite Vecna and the Mind Flayer teaming up. Many people shrug this sort of thing off, saying that it’s really hard to wrap up a five-season arc, that final seasons are often disappointing. I have no doubt of the challenge, but it’s our job as critics of media to take things apart and figure out why they’re not working. Could this series have driven more confidently across the finish line had it abandoned Vecna altogether? Perhaps.

While Stranger Things certainly was influenced heavily by Dungeons & Dragons, there has never been a great deal of Lord of the Rings DNA in the show. It’s always hewed more toward 80s’ era coming-of-age and horror, from Back to the Future to Ghostbusters to E.T. and so forth. Sticking to this type of story for all five seasons would have almost certainly resulted in a better conclusion.

The Mind Flayer, a creature of the Upside Down with no human emotion or motivations, is a much more interesting, Lovecraftian monster than Vecna ever was. Stranger Things should have either kept the Mind Flayer as the chief antagonist or revealed some even greater, more monstrous power behind it and the other eldritch horrors of the Upside Down. So much of Season 4 and 5 were spent building up Vecna, only to have it all flame out in the end.

Season 4 without Vecna could have revolved around some similar events, with the Mind Flayer targeting individuals like Max. The Upside Down itself could have begun seeping into the real world in unsettling ways. A quest to go into the Upside Down to save Max and kill the Mind Flayer once and for all would have been an exciting storyline. Better yet, it wouldn’t require retconning earlier story beats. The show could have gone other directions as well. Time travel is risky, but with the Upside Down frozen in time, you can see how it might work.

Stranger Things

Credit: Netflix

Regardless, choosing cosmic and psychological horror over mythic fantasy would have been a smart direction for Stranger Things, and would have been more thematically consistent with the first three seasons. Even the Season 5 Mind Flayer felt more akin to a dragon or fantasy monster than the shadowy terror we were first introduced to in Season 2.

Other changes I would make along with Vecna’s removal from the storyline:

  • A slimmed down cast. Sorry, Hopper, you should have died at the end of Season 3, and probably a few other characters along with you. At least one or two of the older teens, like the lovable Steve, could have also been killed. Side-characters like Murray should have been written out before becoming caricatures. Adults in general should have had less presence in the show. The genre is not about adults. It’s about kids. Imagine The Goonies with a half dozen adults tramping through the caves. Imagine that movie with the same size cast as Stranger Things.
  • Much less focus on teen romance among the core group. There was enough romance written into the Steve / Jonathan / Nancy subplot. We didn’t need Mike and Eleven to be anything more than friends. I do think that Lucas and Max ending up as a couple in the end, after he helps save her from the Upside Down / Mind Flayer, could have worked. But far too much time was spent on young teen romance and none of it improved the show.
  • No more de-powering Eleven. Eleven should have been at the forefront of Season 5 rather than sidelined by characters like Holly, though the problem was less about Holly and more about the bloated cast in general. Eleven was de-powered in Season 4 and pushed to the side in Season 5. When Will finally gets powers, he’s almost instantly de-powered as well. This kills momentum. Players of D&D will know that once you gain new powers, the last thing you want is to lose them.
  • Cut the entire military subplot. Once the Hawkins Lab people were out of the picture, I’d narrow the focus down to the main characters and their quest to somehow close off the Upside Down and/or kill the Mind Flayer (and the Mind Flayer could have been just one of many, or subservient to an even greater cosmic horror). The show could still include a government subplot, maybe some shadowy investigators poking their noses around, but as it was written, the military was just unforgivably lame.
  • Have Will come out in Season 4 rather than waiting until the end of Season 5 and, if the show insists on giving all the other kids romantic interests, give him one as well (though ideally we should have just avoided all the romance stuff in the younger group, and put an end to the love triangle in the older group much sooner). But if we must include romances for our main characters, put the “Byler” stuff to rest by giving Will a boyfriend or at least a crush.
  • Remove the ambiguity from the ending. Rather than killing off Eleven or leaving her fate a mystery, give her the happy ending she deserves. Neither of the current outcomes are satisfying in the least, though her sacrifice and death was a bold narrative choice until they nerfed it with ambiguity. In the end, Eleven should have been at the D&D table with her friends, the Upside Down closed, her powers gone for good, and a normal life ahead of her filled with love and pain and struggle and joy. I think a lot of people will disagree with me about a lot of other things in this post, but maybe we can all agree on this.

I should note, before we leave, that none of this is a critique of Jamie Campbell Bower, who played Henry / 001 / Vecna with enormous skill and talent. Even if Vecna was cut, in a perfect world Bower would have gotten some other great role in the show. Maybe a character with powers who was also investigating the Upside Down, but with nefarious motives. A secondary antagonist of some kind. Just not the Big Bad fantasy Dark Lord.

Ultimately, removing Vecna from the story wouldn’t fix all its problems, but without him, Stranger Things would have felt more like, well, Stranger Things. What do you think?

Let me know on Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2026/01/21/why-stranger-things-would-have-been-so-much-better-without-vecna/

Market Opportunity
SQUID MEME Logo
SQUID MEME Price(GAME)
$39.9445
$39.9445$39.9445
+0.02%
USD
SQUID MEME (GAME) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Thumzup Drops $2M on Dogecoin, Doubles Down With DogeHash Mining Buy

Thumzup Drops $2M on Dogecoin, Doubles Down With DogeHash Mining Buy

TLDR: Thumzup acquired 7.5 million DOGE for ~$2 million at an average price of $0.2665 per token. The DOGE purchase follows Thumzup’s $50 million stock offering in August, priced at $10 per share. Thumzup plans to acquire DogeHash, a Dogecoin mining operation with 2,500 rigs plus 1,000 more units on order. Dogecoin ETFs are expected [...] The post Thumzup Drops $2M on Dogecoin, Doubles Down With DogeHash Mining Buy appeared first on Blockonomi.
Share
Blockonomi2025/09/19 00:37
VIRTUAL Weekly Analysis Jan 21

VIRTUAL Weekly Analysis Jan 21

The post VIRTUAL Weekly Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. VIRTUAL closed the week up 3.57% at $0.84, but the long-term downtrend maintains its
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 06:54
After the interest rate cut, how far can the institutional bull market go?

After the interest rate cut, how far can the institutional bull market go?

The dominant force in this cycle comes from institutions. The four major cryptocurrencies, BTC, ETH, SOL, and BNB, have all hit new highs, but only BTC and BNB have continued to rise by over 40% since breaking through their all-time highs. SOL achieved a breakout earlier this year thanks to Trump's coin launch, while ETH experienced a revaluation mid-year driven by DAT buying, but neither has yet reached a new high. The Federal Reserve cut interest rates last night. How far can this round of institutional-led market trends go? 1. The institutional configuration logic of the three major currencies The positioning of crypto assets directly determines their long-term value, and different positioning corresponds to different institutional configuration logic. Bitcoin: The anti-inflation property of digital gold Positioned as "digital gold," its long-term logic is strongly tied to the fiat currency inflation cycle. Data shows that its market capitalization growth is synchronized with Global M2 and negatively correlated with the US dollar index. Its core value lies in its "inflation resistance" and value preservation and appreciation, making it a fundamental target for institutional investment. Ethereum: The Institutional Narrative Dividend of the World Computer Positioned as the "World Computer," although the foundation's "Layer 2 scaling" narrative has failed to gain traction in the capital market, its stable system, with 10 years of zero downtime, has capitalized on the development of institutional narratives such as US dollar stablecoins, RWAs, and the tokenization of US stocks. It has shrugged off the collapse of the Web3 narrative, and with the crucial push from DAT, has achieved a revaluation of its market capitalization. Ethereum, with its stability and security, will become the settlement network for institutional applications. Solana: The Active Advantage of Online Capital Markets Positioned as an "Internet Capital Market," Solana (ICM) stands for on-chain asset issuance, trading, and clearing. It has experienced a resurgence following the collapse of FTX. Year-to-date, it accounts for 46% of on-chain trading volume, with over 3 million daily active users year-round, making it the most active blockchain network. Solana, with its superior performance and high liquidity, will be the catalyst for the crypto-native on-chain trading ecosystem. The three platforms have distinct positioning, leading to different institutional investment logic. Traditional financial institutions first understand the value of Bitcoin, then consider developing their institutional business based on Ethereum, and finally, perhaps recognize the value of on-chain transactions. This is a typical path: question, understand, and become a part of it. Second, institutional holdings of the three major currencies show gradient differences The institutional holdings data of BTC, ETH, and SOL show obvious gradient differences, which also reflects the degree and rhythm of institutions' recognition of these three projects. Chart by: IOBC Capital From the comparison, we can see that institutional holdings of BTC and ETH account for > 18% of the circulating supply; SOL currently only accounts for 9.5%, and there may be room for replenishment. 3. SOL DAT: New Trends in Crypto Concept Stocks In the past month or so, 18 SOL DAT companies have come onto the scene, directly pushing SOL up by more than 50% from its August low. The louder SOL DAT company: Chart by: IOBC Capital Among the existing SOL DAT companies, Forward Industries, led by Multicoin Capital founder Kyle Samani, may become the SOL DAT leader. Unlike BTC DAT, which simply hoards coins, many SOL DAT companies will build their own Solana Validators, so that this is not limited to the "NAV game". Instead of simply waiting for token appreciation, they will continue to obtain cash flow income through the Validator business. This strategy is equivalent to "hoarding coins + mining", which is both long-term and profitable in the short term. 4. Crypto Concept Stocks: A Mapping of Capital Market Betting Crypto concept stocks are a new bridge between traditional capital and the crypto market. The degree of recognition of various Crypto businesses by the traditional financial market is also reflected in the stock price performance of crypto concept stocks. Chart by: IOBC Capital Looking back at the crypto stocks that have seen significant gains this round, we can see two common characteristics: 1. Only by betting big can a valuation reassessment be achieved. There are 189 publicly listed companies holding BTC, but only 30 hold 70% of their stock market capitalization, and only 12 hold more than 10,000 BTC—and these 12 have seen significant gains. A similar pattern is observed among listed ETH DATs. A superficial DAT strategy can only cause short-term stock price fluctuations and cannot substantially boost stock market capitalization or liquidity. 2. Business synergy can amplify commercial value. Transforming a single-point business into a multifaceted industry chain layout can amplify commercial value. For example, Robinhood, through its expansion into cryptocurrency trading, real-world asset trading (RRE), and participation in the USDG stablecoin, has formed a closed-loop business cycle for capital flow, leading to record highs in its stock price. Conversely, while Trump Media has also invested heavily in crypto (holding BTC, applying for an ETH ETF, and issuing tokens like Trump, Melania, and WLFI), the lack of synergy between its businesses has ultimately led to a lackluster market response to both its stock and its token. Ending The project philosophies of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana correspond to three instincts of human beings when facing the future: survival, order, and flow.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 19:00