The post Marc Zeller: Insider trading laws don’t ensure market fairness, Aave governance highlights DAO potential, and ownership of assets is crucial in DeFi appearedThe post Marc Zeller: Insider trading laws don’t ensure market fairness, Aave governance highlights DAO potential, and ownership of assets is crucial in DeFi appeared

Marc Zeller: Insider trading laws don’t ensure market fairness, Aave governance highlights DAO potential, and ownership of assets is crucial in DeFi

Insider trading laws aim to prevent the misuse of privileged information rather than ensuring market fairness. Many on-chain analysts misinterpret market information, leading to flawed conclusions. Aave governance is seen as a potential success story for DAOs, highlighting its significance in DeFi.

Key Takeaways

  • Insider trading laws aim to prevent the misuse of privileged information rather than ensuring market fairness.
  • Many on-chain analysts misinterpret market information, leading to flawed conclusions.
  • Aave governance is seen as a potential success story for DAOs, highlighting its significance in DeFi.
  • Aave Labs redirected significant fee revenue without community discussion, raising governance concerns.
  • The Aave community reacted strongly to fee redirection, indicating a desire for more control over revenue sharing.
  • Ownership of intangible assets like IP and brand requires a legal framework in DAOs.
  • Governance uncertainty negatively impacts the value of significant crypto projects.
  • The SEC’s lack of clarity has hindered growth and trust in crypto projects like Aave.
  • Aave’s revenue model relies heavily on collecting a reserve factor from borrowers.
  • Incentivizing front-end developers is crucial for sustainable user experiences in DeFi.
  • ICOs are considered a better method for raising capital and distributing tokens compared to airdrops.
  • The introduction of a second token is not seen as viable for the project.

Guest intro

Marc Zeller is founder of the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), a delegate platform focused on governance participation and protocol development for Aave. Previously, he served as integrations lead at Aave and was instrumental in growing the protocol from its early Ethlend days through the launch of Aave v1 in 2020. Zeller has been a vocal advocate for decentralizing Aave governance and has led efforts to clarify token holder rights and the relationship between the Aave DAO and Aave Labs.

The purpose of insider trading laws

  • Insider trading laws are designed to prevent the misuse of privileged information, not to ensure fairness among market participants.
  • “The point of insider trading laws is not to stop the fairness in the market it is to stop someone expropriating information that they got from a privileged position” – Marc Zeller
  • Many on-chain analysts misinterpret the nature of information and its implications in trading.
  • “There’s a lot of threads on Twitter right now… they’re wrong” – Marc Zeller
  • Accusations of insider trading related to the Maduro bet are unfounded and lack credible evidence.
  • “Show me anything that shows that information was insider” – Marc Zeller
  • The market where the money was made from the Maduro bet was not a traditional stock market but a prediction market.
  • “The market where the money was made was not the Nasdaq it was Polymarket” – Marc Zeller
  • Insider trading laws exist to ensure fairness in the market by preventing those with privileged information from exploiting others.
  • “The intent of the law is to make sure the counterparty are not… there’s fairness to the counterparty” – Marc Zeller

Aave governance and community dynamics

  • Aave governance represents a potential success for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).
  • “We see Aave governance as like one of the shining lights of you know maybe the style thing can actually work” – Marc Zeller
  • Aave Labs redirected significant fee revenue without community discussion, raising governance concerns.
  • “Aave Labs switched its front end swap integration… and there was no discussion or vote on this” – Marc Zeller
  • The governance discussion around Aave was initiated by a token holder’s discovery of fee redirection.
  • “It all started by a token holder… the community state well maybe we should have a discussion” – Marc Zeller
  • The Aave community reacted strongly to the fee redirection, indicating a desire for more control over revenue sharing.
  • “The reaction of AaveLab at that point was like well we do the front end that’s our project” – Marc Zeller
  • Ownership of intangible assets like IP and brand requires a legal framework to be integrated into a DAO.
  • “How do you even wrap IP and brand assets etcetera into a legal wrapper and then put that on chain” – Marc Zeller

Challenges in decentralized governance

  • Ownership and safeguards are crucial in managing decentralized protocols to prevent control over revenue and brand.
  • “Ownership and safeguard is important when you do a business… especially when that business is the DAO” – Marc Zeller
  • A neutral legal wrapper for the DAO can protect assets and ensure that control remains with the community.
  • “There’s gonna be a neutral legal wrapper that is the DAO that will own the asset” – Marc Zeller
  • The uncertainty in DAO governance can hinder progress and innovation.
  • “If we have no recourse and if we have no ownership of this kind of asset from the DAO” – Marc Zeller
  • DAO governance can lead to inefficiencies and misunderstandings among stakeholders.
  • “The DAO governance can be very inefficient and drama-filled” – Marc Zeller
  • Game theory principles suggest that all actors will act in their own best interest, necessitating a balance of power.
  • “Every actor will look for their best personal interest but what we need to do is to make sure the Nash equilibrium benefits everybody” – Marc Zeller

The importance of asset ownership in DeFi

  • The swap feed is less than 10% of the global revenue for Aave, indicating that ownership of assets is more critical.
  • “The swap feed itself is not so important… the real meat of this conversation is about ownership of those assets” – Marc Zeller
  • Ownership of distribution channels is essential for maximizing revenue potential in decentralized protocols.
  • “If there’s no ownership on the distribution channels… there’s a very hard limiter on the valuation model” – Marc Zeller
  • The obligation to share off-protocol revenue with Aave holders should not be discretionary.
  • “We’d prefer if it’s not discretionary right we’d prefer if you are obligated to do this thing” – Marc Zeller
  • There is a hypothetical risk that the Aave front end could act against the interests of the DAO.
  • “What happens in ten years’ time if you know the Aave front end is making a billion dollars a year” – Marc Zeller
  • The domain should remain with the DAO and operated by it for better governance.
  • “The domain should remain to the DAO and operated by the DAO” – Marc Zeller

Market sentiment and fundraising strategies

  • The current sentiment in the market is extremely cynical and distrustful, making it hard to gain traction.
  • “The timeline is like so cynical so burnt out so cooked” – Marc Zeller
  • Changing terms in a fundraising effort can lead to dissatisfaction and distrust among participants.
  • “We changed the terms it’s now 2,000,000… the momentum is not amazing” – Marc Zeller
  • ICOs are a better method for raising capital and distributing tokens compared to airdrops.
  • “ICOs are a much better way of raising capital… a much better way of distributing tokens” – Marc Zeller
  • The decision to switch from ICOs to airdrops created negative incentives.
  • “We stopped doing ICOs and started doing airdrops which just created like the most perverse bad incentives” – Marc Zeller
  • The aggressive vocal minority in the Infinix ecosystem is likely driven by frustration over perceived value extraction.
  • “This has gone like too far now” – Marc Zeller

Prediction markets and information dynamics

  • Prediction markets should not be treated as mere sports betting platforms but as venues for aggregating diverse information.
  • “The goal of prediction markets is not supposed to be a sports betting platform” – Marc Zeller
  • Financial incentives in prediction markets can enhance the reliability of information.
  • “Backing these statements with actual money you can actually make the information more reliable” – Marc Zeller
  • Participation in prediction markets can provide valuable information that enhances decision-making.
  • “It is valuable for everyone to know that information as soon as possible” – Marc Zeller
  • The dynamics of prediction markets improve when information is shared quickly and widely.
  • “The more information and the faster that information gets to the prediction market the better off” – Marc Zeller
  • Misunderstanding prediction markets can lead to poor participation and misguided expectations.
  • “If you don’t understand this dynamic… I’m sorry but you’re a fucking idiot” – Marc Zeller

The role of regulation and market integrity

  • Creating laws around prediction markets can lead to unintended consequences that undermine their usefulness.
  • “By creating this law where you can’t trade if you have information we have actually defeated the entire ruined it” – Marc Zeller
  • The integrity of sports is crucial for maintaining interest in the leagues and their associated gambling markets.
  • “If you have coaches and players that are rigging games people will lose interest” – Marc Zeller
  • Laws and policies must be established to ensure fairness in gambling markets similar to those in sports.
  • “Let’s define what happens if someone breaks those rules right let’s enforce them” – Marc Zeller
  • The relationship between employees and companies regarding trading policies is complex and varies significantly.
  • “Those are policies those are part of your employment contract” – Marc Zeller
  • The evolution of nation-state laws will significantly impact how companies and citizens operate within their jurisdictions.
  • “It’ll be really interesting to see how the nation state laws evolve” – Marc Zeller

Blockchain resilience and philosophy

  • The resilience of a blockchain is crucial for user control and protection against risks.
  • “Users retain control so that they can’t be deplatformed” – Marc Zeller
  • Some blockchain networks lack the necessary resilience to support projects like Aave.
  • “That’s actually what we did I’m one of the reason there’s no Aave on Solano” – Marc Zeller
  • Ethereum’s core philosophy of credible neutrality allows for a more diverse ecosystem of applications.
  • “Everyone built on Ethereum even though Vitalik didn’t like DeFi” – Marc Zeller
  • An optimal environment for building applications is created by not picking and choosing winners.
  • “There’s a reason that all of the Solana apps are basically the same” – Marc Zeller
  • The existence of Tornado Cash is rooted in the desire for privacy in financial transactions.
  • “Vitalik wanted to be able to spread his money without people like creating an entire billion dollar industry around it” – Marc Zeller

Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/marc-zeller-insider-trading-laws-dont-ensure-market-fairness-aave-governance-highlights-dao-potential-and-ownership-of-assets-is-crucial-in-defi-unchained/

Market Opportunity
AaveToken Logo
AaveToken Price(AAVE)
$160.49
$160.49$160.49
+0.82%
USD
AaveToken (AAVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

In a significant pivot, the Federal Reserve reduced its benchmark interest rate following a prolonged ten-month hiatus. This decision, reflecting a strategic response to the current economic climate, has captured attention across financial sectors, with both market participants and policymakers keenly evaluating its potential impact.Continue Reading:Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:28
Iran’s Central Bank Spends $500M on Crypto Amid Rial Crisis

Iran’s Central Bank Spends $500M on Crypto Amid Rial Crisis

Iran's Central Bank has reportedly acquired more than $500 million in cryptocurrency assets over the past year to mitigate the ongoing currency crisis.
Share
coinlineup2026/01/22 08:59
Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35