Annual survey reveals 58% believe fraudsters evolve faster than humans respond, yet many finance executives still depend on manual validation NEW YORK–(BUSINESSAnnual survey reveals 58% believe fraudsters evolve faster than humans respond, yet many finance executives still depend on manual validation NEW YORK–(BUSINESS

AI Fraud Outpaces Human Defenses as 71% of U.S. Companies Report Rise in Attacks, Trustpair Report Finds

2026/01/28 01:46
4 min read

Annual survey reveals 58% believe fraudsters evolve faster than humans respond, yet many finance executives still depend on manual validation

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#SAP–AI-powered fraud has outpaced human defenses at an alarming rate, according to new data from Trustpair. Seventy-one percent of U.S. companies have seen attacks accelerate over the past year, yet 48% still rely on manual checks to stop them.

Developed with corporate practitioners and experts from Kinexys by J.P.Morgan, Fraud in the Cyber Era: 2026 Fraud Trends & Insights surveyed 250 CFOs and senior finance executives at U.S. enterprises, revealing a dangerous gap between the speed and scale of AI-powered attacks and the manual processes companies still use to defend against them.

“AI has raised the baseline of fraud. The risk keeps increasing, but internal processes haven’t moved fast enough,” said Baptiste Collot, co-founder and CEO of Trustpair. “It’s not that companies don’t want to act. They often don’t know how to, or think it means changing everything at once. The reality is that manual callbacks and email checks simply cannot defend against attacks that are generated at scale.”

Key findings:

  • 71% of U.S. companies have experienced an increase in AI-powered fraud attempts over the past 12 months, and nearly half of finance leaders (47%) say AI-generated fraud is now one of their biggest challenges in fraud prevention.
  • Business Email Compromise (BEC) remains the leading fraud channel, affecting 62% of organizations, followed by fake websites (48%) and text message scams (45%).
  • Companies relying primarily on manual validation decreased from 69% to 48% year-over-year. However, nearly half of organizations still depend on human reviews and manual checks that cannot handle the scale of AI attacks.
  • One in four companies reported six-figure losses due to fraud, 45% spent multiple days responding to a single incident, and 17% have had to terminate employees due to fraud-related mistakes.

Enterprises Face Increased Fraud Pressures
Trustpair’s report identifies converging threats impacting enterprises: rising regulatory pressure, faster payment operations, and more sophisticated attacks.

Underlying these pressures is a structural weakness. Vendor data remains siloed across systems, is validated sporadically, and becomes outdated quickly, creating vulnerabilities that fraudsters readily exploit. Only 32% of companies validate vendor bank account details continuously or in real-time, leaving most organizations exposed between onboarding and payment.

As regulatory compliance demands intensify, speed and accuracy matter more than ever. Nacha’s March 2026 requirements will mandate upfront account validation, compounding existing internal control expectations, such as SOX compliance. Alarmingly, nearly half of companies (45%) aren’t aware of these upcoming Nacha rules, and 13% report having no vendor bank-account validation process at all.

Modernization is Underway as Automation Grows
While challenges remain significant, Trustpair’s research reveals encouraging signs of progress. Half of companies increased fraud prevention budgets in 2025, and adoption of automated account validation tools rose slightly (31% to 34%).

Training remains important for enhancing awareness, but as fraud escalates, organizations are turning to automation and continuous validation to reduce human error and strengthen controls without compromising operational efficiency. Embedding these checks into existing finance and procurement processes is critical to enhancing security without adding friction.

To access the report’s findings and learn how enterprises can modernize fraud defenses ahead of upcoming regulatory requirements, download the full report.

##

About Methodology
Trustpair commissioned Dynata to conduct an online survey of 250 senior financial decision-makers at U.S. companies with annual revenues of $500 million or more. Respondents included C-suite executives and other senior leaders in accounting and finance functions with purchasing authority or influence. The survey was fielded in November 2025 with an estimated incidence rate of 30%.

About Trustpair
Created in 2017, Trustpair empowers large global companies to eliminate vendor payment fraud with a market-leading account validation platform. Trustpair serves over 500 corporate and enterprise customers, helping finance teams protect against fraud attacks. The company’s global presence includes offices in New York City, Paris, and London, with 100+ employees dedicated to payment security. Visit trustpair.com to learn more.

Contacts

Media
PANBlast for Trustpair
Emylee Eyler
trustpair@panblastpr.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16