The post XLM Technical Analysis Feb 3 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XLM is approaching the critical primary support zone of 0.1655$ from the 0.17$ level;The post XLM Technical Analysis Feb 3 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XLM is approaching the critical primary support zone of 0.1655$ from the 0.17$ level;

XLM Technical Analysis Feb 3

5 min read

XLM is approaching the critical primary support zone of 0.1655$ from the 0.17$ level; it has dropped 5.74% in the last 24 hours, trapped in the oversold region (RSI 27.59), with a bearish trend prevailing.

Current Price Position and Critical Levels

XLM is positioned around 0.17$ within the overall downtrend and trading below the short-term EMA20 (0.20$). This level has acted as strong dynamic resistance in recent weeks, and the price’s inability to break above it reinforces the bearish momentum. Among the 9 strong levels identified across 1D, 3D, and 1W timeframes, 0.1655$ stands out as the primary support (83/100 score) and 0.1853$ as the nearby resistance (70/100 score). The price showed narrow consolidation in the 0.17$-0.18$ range over the last 24 hours, with volume remaining low at 75.49M$; this indicates that big players are positioning for liquidity hunts. The Supertrend indicator is giving a bearish signal (resistance at 0.21$), while multi-timeframe confluence is concentrated on supports and resistances: 1D shows 1 support/2 resistances, 3D shows 2 supports, 1W shows 1 support/4 resistances.

Support Levels: Buyer Zones

Primary Support

The 0.1655$ level (83/100 score) stands out as XLM’s most critical buyer zone. This zone shows order block confluence on 1D and 3D timeframes; following the sharp drop in October 2025, it was tested and rejected three times here with aggressive buying volume (approximately 2x average volume). From a price action perspective, this level represents a demand zone: on the last test, doji candles with long wicks formed, indicating that buyers strengthened their defense line. It also aligns with the Fibonacci 0.618 retracement on the 1W timeframe, and its proximity to historical lows increases liquidity accumulation potential. If this level breaks, momentum will shift downward rapidly; for invalidation, look for a close above 0.1680$.

Secondary Support and Stop Levels

Secondary support is in the 0.13$-0.14$ range (3D confluence), but the main downside target is 0.0941$ (22/100 score). This zone is a breaker block left over from the supply-demand imbalance at the start of 2025; although the volume profile is low, it gains strength from monthly low confluence on 1W. For stop-loss levels: below primary support at 0.1640$, for secondary at 0.1250$. The importance of these levels lies in being liquidity pools: stop hunts can be triggered here, potentially pulling the price deeper. Although the oversold RSI (27.59) shows a divergence signal, buyers should be cautious as the trend is bearish.

Resistance Levels: Seller Zones

Near-Term Resistances

0.1853$ (70/100 score) is the strongest short-term seller zone. It shows confluence with EMA20 (0.20$) and 1D swing high; in the last two weeks, when price approached here, sellers stepped in, resulting in rejections with high volume spikes. Bearish engulfing patterns dominate the price action, and the Supertrend resistance (0.21$) reinforces it. From an order flow perspective, this level is a premium pricing zone: it should be tested by sweeping buy-side liquidity before an upward breakout.

Main Resistance and Targets

The main resistance at 0.3383$ (61/100 score) forms a strong resistance cluster on the 1W timeframe. This level is a supply zone that closed the fair value gap from the June 2025 rally; tested four times, each with volume increases triggering drops. Upside target is 0.2390$ (41/100 score), a mid-term extension with PD array confluence. For breakout confirmation, a weekly close above 0.19$ is required; otherwise, sellers remain in control. Risk/reward ratio: from 0.1655$ to 0.1853$ is 1:1.5, downside potential 1:3.

Liquidity Map and Big Players

Big players (smart money) are targeting the equal lows liquidity below the 0.1655$ support; this area is full of stop-loss clusters, with a reversal expected after a sweep. Above, the 0.1853$-0.21$ range is a sell-side liquidity pool: ideal for breakout fakeouts. Examining the volume profile, the area around 0.17$ is the value area low, with imbalance downward. Order blocks: bullish OB at 0.1655$ on 3D, bearish OB at 0.20$. Big players are likely accumulating short positions at 0.1853$, to hunt liquidity on a support break.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC is in a downtrend with a 5.06% drop at the 74,737$ level; main supports at 74,625$, 71,188$, and 63,235$. XLM shows high correlation with BTC (0.85), and BTC’s Supertrend bearish signal is pressuring alts. If BTC fails to break 76,937$ resistance, XLM will be pulled to 0.1655$; if BTC drops below 71k, XLM’s downside target accelerates to 0.0941$. Conversely, if BTC rises to 79,318$, XLM opens upside to 0.2390$. Rising BTC dominance is risky for altcoins.

Trading Plan and Level-Based Strategy

Level-based outlook: If it holds above 0.1655$, long bias for XLM Spot Analysis (targets 0.1853$-0.2390$), stop at 0.1640$. On breakout, short for XLM Futures Analysis, target 0.0941$. Wait for multi-timeframe confluence: 1D rejection + volume spike. This is not financial advice; apply your own risk management, target R/R 1:2+. Market is volatile, no news flow but macro risks (BTC) dominate.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Market Analyst: Sarah Chen

Technical analysis and risk management specialist

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/xlm-technical-analysis-february-3-2026-support-resistance-levels

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Solana Hits $4B in Corporate Treasuries as Companies Boost Reserves

Solana Hits $4B in Corporate Treasuries as Companies Boost Reserves

TLDR Solana-based corporate treasuries have surpassed $4 billion in value. These reserves account for nearly 3% of Solana’s total circulating supply. Forward Industries is the largest holder with over 6.8 million SOL tokens. Helius Medical Technologies launched a $500 million Solana treasury reserve. Pantera Capital has a $1.1 billion position in Solana, emphasizing its potential. [...] The post Solana Hits $4B in Corporate Treasuries as Companies Boost Reserves appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 04:08
SHIB Price Prediction: Mixed Signals Point to $0.0000085 Target by February End

SHIB Price Prediction: Mixed Signals Point to $0.0000085 Target by February End

Technical analysis reveals SHIB trading near oversold levels with RSI at 35.06. Despite bearish MACD momentum, support levels suggest potential recovery toward $
Share
BlockChain News2026/02/04 16:04
CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10