A recent post by crypto community figure Pumpius (@pumpius) places renewed focus on remarks made by SEC Chair Paul S. Atkins, arguing that they carry direct implications for Ripple and XRP rather than representing abstract regulatory commentary.
According to Pumpius, Atkins’ discussion about harmonizing rules between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission closely mirrors positions Ripple has consistently maintained over several years.
The tweet frames the comments as validation of an approach centered on operating within the U.S. regulatory system, seeking definitional clarity, and formally distinguishing securities from commodities.
Pumpius emphasized that this posture was not reactive. Instead, he described it as a deliberate strategy designed to anticipate an eventual regulatory environment that would prioritize clarity, jurisdictional boundaries, and institutional usability.
In his view, the direction now being discussed by U.S. regulators reflects conditions Ripple has long prepared for rather than a shift the company must now scramble to accommodate.
The tweet draws heavily on a video clip from a Fox interview in which Atkins detailed upcoming regulatory initiatives.
In the interview, Atkins explained that recent legislative and regulatory work has placed stablecoins squarely within the banking sector, with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency actively developing a regulatory structure for them.
He then turned to the broader digital asset market, noting that regulators are preparing to release a formal taxonomy distinguishing digital commodities from tokenized securities.
Atkins stated that this taxonomy is intended to provide market participants with clear guidance on which assets fall under the CFTC’s remit and which remain under the SEC’s authority.
Digital commodities, digital tools, and digital collectibles would fall under CFTC oversight, while tokenized securities would remain under SEC jurisdiction. He characterized this effort as an attempt to end what he described as years of regulation through enforcement, a practice he said has hindered innovation across financial services.
Pumpius argued that Atkins’ comments about voluntarily clarifying and, in some cases, ceding jurisdiction underscore a broader goal of harmonizing SEC and CFTC rules.
The tweet connects this directly to Ripple’s long-standing public position, frequently articulated by CEO Brad Garlinghouse, that regulation itself is not harmful to the digital asset sector. Instead, the absence of clear and consistent rules has been the primary obstacle.
According to Pumpius, while other crypto firms sought to avoid U.S. oversight or move operations offshore, Ripple remained engaged domestically, continuing to build infrastructure intended for banks, payment networks, and government entities.
The harmonized regulatory environment now being outlined, he suggested, aligns with that strategy and reinforces the idea that Ripple and XRP were structured with institutional compliance in mind from the outset.
Atkins concluded his remarks by stressing that regulatory clarity would allow innovators to develop products within the United States rather than feeling compelled to operate abroad. Pumpius’s post presents this objective as consistent with Ripple’s long-term outlook, asserting that the regulatory conditions now taking shape reflect an environment the company has been positioning for over many years.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
The post Expert Says This SEC Chair’s Statement Points Directly at Ripple and XRP appeared first on Times Tabloid.


