The post Black Ops 7’ Is Making One Major Change After Gamer Backlash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Black Ops 7 Credit: Activision Back when Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare II was drawing down and Modern Warfare III was on the horizon, the Call Of Duty community was up in arms. The new game, they believed, was little more than a glorified and overpriced DLC. To help mollify the community, Activision announced that all the guns and Operator skins from MWII would carry over to MWIII. If anything, this made the sequel feel even more like an expansion. Now, I disagree that MWIII was just a glorified DLC for MWII. It was a very different game in a lot of ways, with a much better movement system and a ton of new (and remade) maps. It felt a lot better to play. But it was weird to have two Modern Warfare games release back-to-back, and I understand why the community was a little miffed, especially since the campaign was pretty lackluster and felt like it had been rushed. Now we find ourselves in a similar situation, with Black Ops 7 releasing the year after Black Ops 6. The latter introduced tons of new stuff including the fun (if controversial) Omnimovement mechanics, which I’ve come to really enjoy. But the Black Ops 7 reveal left a lot of gamers really upset. Partly, it’s the contrast to Battlefield 6. That game feels like a proper military sim, while Black Ops 7 seems to be taking the franchise in an absurdist direction, not just futuristic but completely off-the-wall. The reveal trailer was overwhelmingly disliked by gamers, with many commenting that the trailer alone made them pre-order Battlefield 6 out of spite. One big issue? The direction Activision has gone with Operator skins over the past few games. Call Of Duty has had goofy skins for a long time, but these were… The post Black Ops 7’ Is Making One Major Change After Gamer Backlash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Black Ops 7 Credit: Activision Back when Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare II was drawing down and Modern Warfare III was on the horizon, the Call Of Duty community was up in arms. The new game, they believed, was little more than a glorified and overpriced DLC. To help mollify the community, Activision announced that all the guns and Operator skins from MWII would carry over to MWIII. If anything, this made the sequel feel even more like an expansion. Now, I disagree that MWIII was just a glorified DLC for MWII. It was a very different game in a lot of ways, with a much better movement system and a ton of new (and remade) maps. It felt a lot better to play. But it was weird to have two Modern Warfare games release back-to-back, and I understand why the community was a little miffed, especially since the campaign was pretty lackluster and felt like it had been rushed. Now we find ourselves in a similar situation, with Black Ops 7 releasing the year after Black Ops 6. The latter introduced tons of new stuff including the fun (if controversial) Omnimovement mechanics, which I’ve come to really enjoy. But the Black Ops 7 reveal left a lot of gamers really upset. Partly, it’s the contrast to Battlefield 6. That game feels like a proper military sim, while Black Ops 7 seems to be taking the franchise in an absurdist direction, not just futuristic but completely off-the-wall. The reveal trailer was overwhelmingly disliked by gamers, with many commenting that the trailer alone made them pre-order Battlefield 6 out of spite. One big issue? The direction Activision has gone with Operator skins over the past few games. Call Of Duty has had goofy skins for a long time, but these were…

Black Ops 7’ Is Making One Major Change After Gamer Backlash

Black Ops 7

Credit: Activision

Back when Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare II was drawing down and Modern Warfare III was on the horizon, the Call Of Duty community was up in arms. The new game, they believed, was little more than a glorified and overpriced DLC. To help mollify the community, Activision announced that all the guns and Operator skins from MWII would carry over to MWIII. If anything, this made the sequel feel even more like an expansion.

Now, I disagree that MWIII was just a glorified DLC for MWII. It was a very different game in a lot of ways, with a much better movement system and a ton of new (and remade) maps. It felt a lot better to play. But it was weird to have two Modern Warfare games release back-to-back, and I understand why the community was a little miffed, especially since the campaign was pretty lackluster and felt like it had been rushed.

Now we find ourselves in a similar situation, with Black Ops 7 releasing the year after Black Ops 6. The latter introduced tons of new stuff including the fun (if controversial) Omnimovement mechanics, which I’ve come to really enjoy. But the Black Ops 7 reveal left a lot of gamers really upset. Partly, it’s the contrast to Battlefield 6. That game feels like a proper military sim, while Black Ops 7 seems to be taking the franchise in an absurdist direction, not just futuristic but completely off-the-wall.

The reveal trailer was overwhelmingly disliked by gamers, with many commenting that the trailer alone made them pre-order Battlefield 6 out of spite. One big issue? The direction Activision has gone with Operator skins over the past few games. Call Of Duty has had goofy skins for a long time, but these were historically pretty rare. A Snoop Dogg skin here, a Grim Reaper skin there, maybe some kind of horror movie killer or Santa. Now, comparisons to Fortnite are commonplace and well-earned.

When Treyarch revealed that Operator skins and guns/blueprints would Carry Over to Black Ops 7, you could almost hear the audible groan of the community (or maybe that was just me). It’s nice to just start over with more grounded Operators and everyone leveling the same guns each year, and now we’d have to deal with Beavis and Butthead with the launch of Season 1, and fully leveled-up guns with laser and dismemberment effects.

When I spoke with Treyarch, I asked them if they were considering anything to appeal to gamers who preferred to play the game as more of a mil-sim. Perhaps a toggle, I suggested, similar to how you can toggle off dismemberment effects and animations. They said they were listening to community feedback, but were otherwise noncommittal. These Operator skin bundles are hugely profitable, so it makes sense that Activision and Microsoft would not want to give players the option to turn them off.

Then again, from a zoomed out perspective, maybe it would make sense to throw your community a bone. Today, Activision announced that they were, in fact, throwing at least a small bone to Call Of Duty players. They’ve reversed the decision to Carry Over skins and guns from Black Ops 6 to Black Ops 7, though these will still be available in the free-to-play Warzone battle royale.

“We know there’s been a lot of conversation recently about the identity of Call of Duty,” Activision posted in a community update Tuesday. “Some of you have said we’ve drifted from what made Call of Duty unique in the first place: immersive, intense, visceral and in many ways grounded. That feedback hits home, and we take it seriously. We hear you.

Operators, Operator Skins, and Weapons from Black Ops 6 will no longer carry forward into Black Ops 7.

“Black Ops 7 needs to feel authentic to Call of Duty and its setting. That is why Black Ops 6 Operator and Weapon content will not carry forward to Black Ops 7.”

Activision notes that XP tokens and Gobblegums (consumables, basically) will carry over to Black Ops 7, which is good. In fact, I’d say this entire update is a very good thing all around. In fact, the post also notes that this isn’t stopping with Carry Over.

“In Black Ops 7, bundles and items will be crafted to fit the Black Ops identity,” the post continues. “We hear the feedback. We need to deliver a better balance toward the immersive, core Call of Duty experience.”

This is great news if Activision sticks to it and really does avoid the ridiculous direction these games have gone over the past few years. I think the occasional fun or zany bundle is fine, but when Beavis and Butthead and green dragon people are everywhere, it starts to get pretty stupid. A toggle on/off option would also be a good idea, though I’m not sure how feasible that is from the developer’s end.

This is certainly Activision listening to consumer feedback, but it’s also pressure from the competition. Battlefield 6 is opting for a more realistic approach, and the popularity of that decision has had ripple effects. This is why it’s so important to have competition from other big FPS games. I guess we’ll see what exactly the “Black Ops identity” is over the next year.

Black Ops 7 launches on November 14th. There will be an open beta in early October. Read more about the upcoming first-person shooter right here.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2025/08/26/call-of-duty-black-ops-7-is-making-one-major-change-after-gamer-backlash/

Market Opportunity
Sport.Fun Logo
Sport.Fun Price(FUN)
$0
$0$0
0.00%
USD
Sport.Fun (FUN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

TD Cowen cuts Strategy price target to $440, cites lower bitcoin yield outlook

TD Cowen cuts Strategy price target to $440, cites lower bitcoin yield outlook

Despite the target cut, TD Cowen said Strategy remains an attractive vehicle for investors seeking bitcoin exposure.
Share
Coinstats2026/01/15 07:29
How to earn from cloud mining: IeByte’s upgraded auto-cloud mining platform unlocks genuine passive earnings

How to earn from cloud mining: IeByte’s upgraded auto-cloud mining platform unlocks genuine passive earnings

The post How to earn from cloud mining: IeByte’s upgraded auto-cloud mining platform unlocks genuine passive earnings appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. contributor Posted: September 17, 2025 As digital assets continue to reshape global finance, cloud mining has become one of the most effective ways for investors to generate stable passive income. Addressing the growing demand for simplicity, security, and profitability, IeByte has officially upgraded its fully automated cloud mining platform, empowering both beginners and experienced investors to earn Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and other mainstream cryptocurrencies without the need for hardware or technical expertise. Why cloud mining in 2025? Traditional crypto mining requires expensive hardware, high electricity costs, and constant maintenance. In 2025, with blockchain networks becoming more competitive, these barriers have grown even higher. Cloud mining solves this by allowing users to lease professional mining power remotely, eliminating the upfront costs and complexity. IeByte stands at the forefront of this transformation, offering investors a transparent and seamless path to daily earnings. IeByte’s upgraded auto-cloud mining platform With its latest upgrade, IeByte introduces: Full Automation: Mining contracts can be activated in just one click, with all processes handled by IeByte’s servers. Enhanced Security: Bank-grade encryption, cold wallets, and real-time monitoring protect every transaction. Scalable Options: From starter packages to high-level investment contracts, investors can choose the plan that matches their goals. Global Reach: Already trusted by users in over 100 countries. Mining contracts for 2025 IeByte offers a wide range of contracts tailored for every investor level. From entry-level plans with daily returns to premium high-yield packages, the platform ensures maximum accessibility. Contract Type Duration Price Daily Reward Total Earnings (Principal + Profit) Starter Contract 1 Day $200 $6 $200 + $6 + $10 bonus Bronze Basic Contract 2 Days $500 $13.5 $500 + $27 Bronze Basic Contract 3 Days $1,200 $36 $1,200 + $108 Silver Advanced Contract 1 Day $5,000 $175 $5,000 + $175 Silver Advanced Contract 2 Days $8,000 $320 $8,000 + $640 Silver…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:48
BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models

BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models

The post BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BlackRock is steering $185 billion worth of model portfolios deeper into US stocks and artificial intelligence. The decision came this week as the asset manager adjusted its entire model suite, increasing its equity allocation and dumping exposure to international developed markets. The firm now sits 2% overweight on stocks, after money moved between several of its biggest exchange-traded funds. This wasn’t a slow shuffle. Billions flowed across multiple ETFs on Tuesday as BlackRock executed the realignment. The iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) alone brought in $3.4 billion, the largest single-day haul in its history. The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) collected $2.3 billion, while the iShares US Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) added nearly $2 billion. The rebalancing triggered swift inflows and outflows that realigned investor exposure on the back of performance data and macroeconomic outlooks. BlackRock raises equities on strong US earnings The model updates come as BlackRock backs the rally in American stocks, fueled by strong earnings and optimism around rate cuts. In an investment letter obtained by Bloomberg, the firm said US companies have delivered 11% earnings growth since the third quarter of 2024. Meanwhile, earnings across other developed markets barely touched 2%. That gap helped push the decision to drop international holdings in favor of American ones. Michael Gates, lead portfolio manager for BlackRock’s Target Allocation ETF model portfolio suite, said the US market is the only one showing consistency in sales growth, profit delivery, and revisions in analyst forecasts. “The US equity market continues to stand alone in terms of earnings delivery, sales growth and sustainable trends in analyst estimates and revisions,” Michael wrote. He added that non-US developed markets lagged far behind, especially when it came to sales. This week’s changes reflect that position. The move was made ahead of the Federal…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:44