The post Why “Satisfactory” Service Is No Longer Enough appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Customers will no longer accept mediocre or sub-par service. getty Customers are losing patience. Many will no longer accept mediocre or sub-par service. They expect more for the money they spend. My annual customer experience research finds that customers are giving companies and brands fewer chances when they fail to deliver the experience customers expect. The average customer will give a company 2.2 chances before walking. Furthermore, 27% of customers say they are either not likely (19%) or will never (8%) return, even if they are satisfied. The definition of “satisfied” is a “middle-of-the-road” experience. On a scale of one to five, an average or satisfactory experience is a three. In other words, the experience isn’t bad, but it’s not great either. The message is clear. “Satisfactory” customer service isn’t good enough, and it could cause you to lose a quarter of your customers. And one more finding from the report to emphasize this point. When asked if they would be willing to switch brands because they know another company can provide a better experience, 79% of customers—almost four out of five—said yes. Even if your service is acceptable, the knowledge that another company can offer something better puts you at risk. Proof from the American Customer Satisfaction Index According to the recent release of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), customer service in the U.S. has dropped for three consecutive quarters after rebounding from lower levels during the pandemic, and it hasn’t really improved in 12 years. Meanwhile, corporate profit margins have increased by 3-4% over the past decade. This trend reveals that companies are “extracting more from customers while delivering less,” a practice the ACSI warns “is not a mark of a well-functioning economy.” This occurs when “buyers lose power relative to sellers, allowing companies to prioritize profits… The post Why “Satisfactory” Service Is No Longer Enough appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Customers will no longer accept mediocre or sub-par service. getty Customers are losing patience. Many will no longer accept mediocre or sub-par service. They expect more for the money they spend. My annual customer experience research finds that customers are giving companies and brands fewer chances when they fail to deliver the experience customers expect. The average customer will give a company 2.2 chances before walking. Furthermore, 27% of customers say they are either not likely (19%) or will never (8%) return, even if they are satisfied. The definition of “satisfied” is a “middle-of-the-road” experience. On a scale of one to five, an average or satisfactory experience is a three. In other words, the experience isn’t bad, but it’s not great either. The message is clear. “Satisfactory” customer service isn’t good enough, and it could cause you to lose a quarter of your customers. And one more finding from the report to emphasize this point. When asked if they would be willing to switch brands because they know another company can provide a better experience, 79% of customers—almost four out of five—said yes. Even if your service is acceptable, the knowledge that another company can offer something better puts you at risk. Proof from the American Customer Satisfaction Index According to the recent release of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), customer service in the U.S. has dropped for three consecutive quarters after rebounding from lower levels during the pandemic, and it hasn’t really improved in 12 years. Meanwhile, corporate profit margins have increased by 3-4% over the past decade. This trend reveals that companies are “extracting more from customers while delivering less,” a practice the ACSI warns “is not a mark of a well-functioning economy.” This occurs when “buyers lose power relative to sellers, allowing companies to prioritize profits…

Why “Satisfactory” Service Is No Longer Enough

Customers will no longer accept mediocre or sub-par service.

getty

Customers are losing patience. Many will no longer accept mediocre or sub-par service. They expect more for the money they spend. My annual customer experience research finds that customers are giving companies and brands fewer chances when they fail to deliver the experience customers expect.

The average customer will give a company 2.2 chances before walking. Furthermore, 27% of customers say they are either not likely (19%) or will never (8%) return, even if they are satisfied. The definition of “satisfied” is a “middle-of-the-road” experience. On a scale of one to five, an average or satisfactory experience is a three. In other words, the experience isn’t bad, but it’s not great either. The message is clear. “Satisfactory” customer service isn’t good enough, and it could cause you to lose a quarter of your customers.

And one more finding from the report to emphasize this point. When asked if they would be willing to switch brands because they know another company can provide a better experience, 79% of customers—almost four out of five—said yes. Even if your service is acceptable, the knowledge that another company can offer something better puts you at risk.

Proof from the American Customer Satisfaction Index

According to the recent release of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), customer service in the U.S. has dropped for three consecutive quarters after rebounding from lower levels during the pandemic, and it hasn’t really improved in 12 years. Meanwhile, corporate profit margins have increased by 3-4% over the past decade. This trend reveals that companies are “extracting more from customers while delivering less,” a practice the ACSI warns “is not a mark of a well-functioning economy.” This occurs when “buyers lose power relative to sellers, allowing companies to prioritize profits at the expense of customer satisfaction rather than by truly earning them through superior service.”

In short, markets are failing to reward good customer treatment. Furthermore, companies are making profits “at the expense of their customers” rather than by satisfying them. In the long term, a company practicing this type of customer experience will eventually fall behind competitors that offer the experience customers want and deserve.

Gen-Z Is Driving the Crisis

The differences between older and younger customers’ tolerance for poor service is worth noting.

While 52% of Baby Boomers give companies a second chance after poor service, only 37% of Gen-Z customers show the same tolerance. As younger consumers become the dominant economic force, businesses face an increasingly impatient customer base that expects the first interaction, and each one thereafter, to meet or exceed their expectations.

And what happens when customers need help or have a complaint? Four out of 10 customers (43%) would rather clean a toilet than call customer support. While you may smile at this finding, it’s a measurable aversion to what should be a basic business function and pleasant experience. And this lack of patience shows up as anger, especially toward the customer support contact center. Sixty percent of customers have hung up on customer service agents and 34% have yelled at them. This is not the behavior of customers looking forward to employees who can help them solve their problems and answer their questions.

Despite this frustration and lack of patience, 91% of customers believe companies should be putting more emphasis on customer service now than in the past. The message is clear: Customers haven’t given up on customer service. They actually want to experience good service. They are simply impatient and tired of waiting for it.

The patience and tolerance customers had “yesterday” is gone. Customers know what great service looks like. They’ve learned from rock star brands. Those companies and brands have created an expectation that customers now have for every company they do business with. Understand that, in general, we’re in a customer patience crisis. Failing to recognize that and take action puts your company at risk. Companies that recognize this shift and adapt their service/experience strategies accordingly will gain a significant competitive advantage compared to those that don’t.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/shephyken/2025/08/31/the-great-customer-patience-crisis-why-satisfactory-service-is-no-longer-enough/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.009847
$0.009847$0.009847
-0.73%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Saudi Awwal Bank Adopts Chainlink Tools, LINK Near $23

Saudi Awwal Bank Adopts Chainlink Tools, LINK Near $23

The post Saudi Awwal Bank Adopts Chainlink Tools, LINK Near $23 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SAB adopts Chainlink’s CCIP and CRE to expand tokenization and cross-border finance tools. SAB and Wamid target $2.32T Saudi capital markets with blockchain-based tokenization plans. LINK price falls 2.43% to $22.99 despite higher trading volume and steady liquidity ratios. Saudi Awwal Bank has added Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) and the Chainlink Runtime Environment (CRE) to its digital strategy. CCIP links assets and data across multiple blockchains, while CRE provides banks with a controlled framework to test and deploy new financial applications. The lender, with more than $100 billion in assets, is applying the tools to tokenized assets, cross-border settlement, and automated credit platforms. The move signals that Chainlink’s infrastructure is being adopted at scale inside regulated finance. Related: Chainlink’s Deal with SBI Is a Major Win, But Chart Shows LINK’s Battle at $27 Resistance Wamid Partnership Aims at $2.32 Trillion Markets In parallel, SAB signed an agreement with Wamid, a subsidiary of the Saudi Tadawul Group, to pilot tokenization of the Saudi Exchange’s $2.32 trillion capital markets. The focus is on equities and debt products, opening the door for blockchain-based issuance and settlement. SAB has already executed the world’s first Islamic repo on distributed ledger technology, in collaboration with Oumla earlier this year. That transaction gave regulators a template for compliant on-chain contracts. The Wamid deal builds directly on that precedent, shifting from single-instrument pilots toward broader capital markets integration. Saudi Blockchain Buildout Gains Pace Saudi institutions are building multiple layers of digital infrastructure. Oumla is working with Avalanche to develop the Kingdom’s first domestically hosted Layer 1 blockchain. SAB’s Chainlink adoption adds an interoperability and execution layer on top. Together, these projects are shaping a domestic framework for tokenization, with global connectivity added only where liquidity requires it. LINK Price and Liquidity Snapshot While institutional adoption progresses, Chainlink’s…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:49
Pump.fun CEO to Call Low-Cap Gem to Test New ‘Callouts’ Feature — Is a 100x Incoming?

Pump.fun CEO to Call Low-Cap Gem to Test New ‘Callouts’ Feature — Is a 100x Incoming?

Pump.fun has rolled out a new social feature that is already stirring debate across Solana’s meme coin scene, after founder Alon Cohen said he would personally
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/16 06:26
New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York’s top financial regulator urged banks to adopt blockchain analytics, signaling tighter oversight of crypto-linked risks. The move reflects regulators’ concern that traditional institutions face rising exposure to digital assets. While crypto-native firms already rely on monitoring tools, the Department of Financial Services now expects banks to use them to detect illicit activity. NYDFS Outlines Compliance Expectations The notice, issued on Wednesday by Superintendent Adrienne Harris, applies to all state-chartered banks and foreign branches. In its industry letter, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) emphasized that blockchain analytics should be integrated into compliance programs according to each bank’s size, operations, and risk appetite. The regulator cautioned that crypto markets evolve quickly, requiring institutions to update frameworks regularly. “Emerging technologies introduce evolving threats that require enhanced monitoring tools,” the notice stated. It stressed the need for banks to prevent money laundering, sanctions violations, and other illicit finance linked to virtual currency transactions. To that end, the Department listed specific areas where blockchain analytics can be applied: Screening customer wallets with crypto exposure to assess risks. Verifying the origin of funds from virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Monitoring the ecosystem holistically to detect money laundering or sanctions exposure. Identifying and assessing counterparties, such as third-party VASPs. Evaluating expected versus actual transaction activity, including dollar thresholds. Weighing risks tied to new digital asset products before rollout. These examples highlight how institutions can tailor monitoring tools to strengthen their risk management frameworks. The guidance expands on NYDFS’s Virtual Currency-Related Activities (VCRA) framework, which has governed crypto oversight in the state since 2022. Regulators Signal Broader Impact Market observers say the notice is less about new rules and more about clarifying expectations. By formalizing the role of blockchain analytics in traditional finance, New York is reinforcing the idea that banks cannot treat crypto exposure as a niche concern. Analysts also believe the approach could ripple beyond New York. Federal agencies and regulators in other states may view the guidance as a blueprint for aligning banking oversight with the realities of digital asset adoption. For institutions, failure to adopt blockchain intelligence tools may invite regulatory scrutiny and undermine their ability to safeguard customer trust. With crypto now firmly embedded in global finance, New York’s stance suggests that blockchain analytics are no longer optional for banks — they are essential to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 08:49