PANews reported on March 3rd that, according to The Defiant, the Aptos community overwhelmingly passed a proposal aimed at introducing deflationary token economicsPANews reported on March 3rd that, according to The Defiant, the Aptos community overwhelmingly passed a proposal aimed at introducing deflationary token economics

The Aptos community passed a proposal to "set the APT supply cap at 2.1 billion".

2026/03/03 11:08
1 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

PANews reported on March 3rd that, according to The Defiant, the Aptos community overwhelmingly passed a proposal aimed at introducing deflationary token economics, with voting ending on March 1st. The proposal sets a hard cap on the total supply of APT tokens at 2.1 billion, effectively transforming APT from an unlimited supply to a finite supply. The voting results showed 335.2 million APT in favor and only 1,500 against, but the participation rate was only 39%, slightly above the community's required 35% threshold. The proposal is currently pending implementation. The proposal aims to enhance APT's deflationary properties by limiting future inflation and rewarding long-term holders.

Previously, Aptos updated its token economic model: Gas fees increased tenfold, and the supply capped at 2.1 billion tokens .

Market Opportunity
Aptos Logo
Aptos Price(APT)
$0.9813
$0.9813$0.9813
+0.66%
USD
Aptos (APT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.