The post Aave founder warns U.K. rules could make GBP stablecoins ‘unattractive’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why is the U.K.’s new proposal bad for stablecoins?  Per Kulechov, the reserve model and holding restriction would repel issuers  What’s the status of pound-backed stablecoins? They rank 10th on the stablecoin market, and the proposal would do less to improve their standings.  The Founder of DeFi lending protocol Aave [AAVE], Stani Kulechov, has slammed the recent U.K. proposal to cap stablecoins at £20k and limit yield-bearing reserves to only 60%.  In an X post, Kulechov warned that if the country proceeds with the “misguided” plan, stablecoin issuers would likely give it a pass. He quipped,  “That (60% yielding assets) makes pound-backed stablecoins inefficient, uncompetitive, and unattractive compared with global alternatives.” For Kulechov, however, the plans could dent the pound-based stablecoin growth potential. He added,  “HM Treasury is likely to copy this approach, turning the UK into one of the least appealing places to issue a stablecoin. This is another misguided move by the Bank of England.”  Source: X GBP vs U.S dollar-backed stablecoins For comparison, the U.S. doesn’t limit the amount of reserve assets that are investable in yield-bearing products, such as T-bills. The only key prerequisite is a 1:1 backing for the issued stablecoin.  The business model is lucrative due to the yield. Tether, the USDT issuer, for example, has made $10B in YTD profits because of this viable model. About 77% of USDT reserves are parked in T-bills and cash equivalents.  Now, some players plan to lobby the U.K. government to relax the restrictions, perhaps to mirror the U.S. stance and remain attractive.  That said, the US dollar enjoys a massive moat due to its global reserve standing, as evidenced by its substantial foreign reserves.  The macro moat behind USD dominance According to the IMF, as of 2025, the USD controlled 58% of global foreign… The post Aave founder warns U.K. rules could make GBP stablecoins ‘unattractive’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why is the U.K.’s new proposal bad for stablecoins?  Per Kulechov, the reserve model and holding restriction would repel issuers  What’s the status of pound-backed stablecoins? They rank 10th on the stablecoin market, and the proposal would do less to improve their standings.  The Founder of DeFi lending protocol Aave [AAVE], Stani Kulechov, has slammed the recent U.K. proposal to cap stablecoins at £20k and limit yield-bearing reserves to only 60%.  In an X post, Kulechov warned that if the country proceeds with the “misguided” plan, stablecoin issuers would likely give it a pass. He quipped,  “That (60% yielding assets) makes pound-backed stablecoins inefficient, uncompetitive, and unattractive compared with global alternatives.” For Kulechov, however, the plans could dent the pound-based stablecoin growth potential. He added,  “HM Treasury is likely to copy this approach, turning the UK into one of the least appealing places to issue a stablecoin. This is another misguided move by the Bank of England.”  Source: X GBP vs U.S dollar-backed stablecoins For comparison, the U.S. doesn’t limit the amount of reserve assets that are investable in yield-bearing products, such as T-bills. The only key prerequisite is a 1:1 backing for the issued stablecoin.  The business model is lucrative due to the yield. Tether, the USDT issuer, for example, has made $10B in YTD profits because of this viable model. About 77% of USDT reserves are parked in T-bills and cash equivalents.  Now, some players plan to lobby the U.K. government to relax the restrictions, perhaps to mirror the U.S. stance and remain attractive.  That said, the US dollar enjoys a massive moat due to its global reserve standing, as evidenced by its substantial foreign reserves.  The macro moat behind USD dominance According to the IMF, as of 2025, the USD controlled 58% of global foreign…

Aave founder warns U.K. rules could make GBP stablecoins ‘unattractive’

Key Takeaways

Why is the U.K.’s new proposal bad for stablecoins? 

Per Kulechov, the reserve model and holding restriction would repel issuers 

What’s the status of pound-backed stablecoins?

They rank 10th on the stablecoin market, and the proposal would do less to improve their standings. 


The Founder of DeFi lending protocol Aave [AAVE], Stani Kulechov, has slammed the recent U.K. proposal to cap stablecoins at £20k and limit yield-bearing reserves to only 60%. 

In an X post, Kulechov warned that if the country proceeds with the “misguided” plan, stablecoin issuers would likely give it a pass. He quipped, 

For Kulechov, however, the plans could dent the pound-based stablecoin growth potential. He added, 

Source: X

GBP vs U.S dollar-backed stablecoins

For comparison, the U.S. doesn’t limit the amount of reserve assets that are investable in yield-bearing products, such as T-bills. The only key prerequisite is a 1:1 backing for the issued stablecoin. 

The business model is lucrative due to the yield. Tether, the USDT issuer, for example, has made $10B in YTD profits because of this viable model. About 77% of USDT reserves are parked in T-bills and cash equivalents. 

Now, some players plan to lobby the U.K. government to relax the restrictions, perhaps to mirror the U.S. stance and remain attractive. 

That said, the US dollar enjoys a massive moat due to its global reserve standing, as evidenced by its substantial foreign reserves. 

The macro moat behind USD dominance

According to the IMF, as of 2025, the USD controlled 58% of global foreign reserves, followed by the Euro (6%) and the Great British pound, GBP (5%). The Chinese Renminbi came in fourth at 2%, but has been growing steadily. 

Source: IMF

Put differently, offshore demand for USD is huge compared to GBP and would cap the growth of pound-backed stablecoins. 

A similar stance was recently shared by Chuk Okpalugo, former Product Lead at stablecoin issuer Paxos. In fact, he said that “people don’t want stablecoins, they want U.S. dollars,” especially in the emerging markets.

As of writing, the USD-backed stablecoin commanded 99.8% ($303.7 billion) of the stablecoin market share. Euro-backed products came in second, while the pound-backed segment ranks 10th with only $341k worth of assets.  

Source: Artemis

Previous: Dogecoin: Can DOGE breakout despite $700M whale sell-off?
Next: Uniswap: Why UNI traders should watch THIS price level to buy

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/aave-founder-warns-u-k-rules-could-make-gbp-stablecoins-unattractive/

Market Opportunity
AaveToken Logo
AaveToken Price(AAVE)
$154.01
$154.01$154.01
+0.23%
USD
AaveToken (AAVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

BitcoinWorld Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims In a significant move for cryptocurrency security, Trust Wallet has committed
Share
bitcoinworld2025/12/26 17:40
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

CZ hinted at possible insider involvement in the Trust Wallet incident while assuring users that their funds would be reimbursed.
Share
CryptoPotato2025/12/26 16:48