TLDR Retail investors lost $17B chasing Bitcoin exposure via treasury firms. Metaplanet and Strategy stocks dropped up to 50% during Bitcoin’s fall. Treasury firms traded 40–50% above Bitcoin value before the crash. Losses were concentrated among investors in the US, Japan, and Europe Retail investors chasing Bitcoin exposure through corporate treasury stocks have seen $17 [...] The post Bitcoin proxy bets through treasury firms wipe out 17 billion losses appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Retail investors lost $17B chasing Bitcoin exposure via treasury firms. Metaplanet and Strategy stocks dropped up to 50% during Bitcoin’s fall. Treasury firms traded 40–50% above Bitcoin value before the crash. Losses were concentrated among investors in the US, Japan, and Europe Retail investors chasing Bitcoin exposure through corporate treasury stocks have seen $17 [...] The post Bitcoin proxy bets through treasury firms wipe out 17 billion losses appeared first on CoinCentral.

Bitcoin proxy bets through treasury firms wipe out 17 billion losses

TLDR

  • Retail investors lost $17B chasing Bitcoin exposure via treasury firms.
  • Metaplanet and Strategy stocks dropped up to 50% during Bitcoin’s fall.
  • Treasury firms traded 40–50% above Bitcoin value before the crash.
  • Losses were concentrated among investors in the US, Japan, and Europe

Retail investors chasing Bitcoin exposure through corporate treasury stocks have seen $17 billion erased in a few months. The idea of owning Bitcoin through public companies such as Metaplanet and Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) seemed safer and simpler. But when Bitcoin’s rally cooled and valuations corrected, these stocks fell twice as hard, leaving investors with steep losses and a harsh reminder about indirect exposure.

The Rise of Corporate Bitcoin Treasuries

During Bitcoin’s surge in late 2024 and early 2025, several firms adopted the “digital asset treasury” model. They used company balance sheets to buy large amounts of Bitcoin, pitching themselves as accessible Bitcoin proxies. Strategy, led by Michael Saylor, became the symbol of this movement, inspiring others like Japan’s Metaplanet to follow the same approach.

According to 10X Research, by mid-2025 dozens of small and mid-cap firms had rebranded around their Bitcoin holdings. Investors bought these stocks to gain exposure without managing digital wallets or using exchange-traded funds. However, the equities began trading at large premiums—sometimes 40% to 50% higher than their actual Bitcoin per-share value. Analysts at Bloomberg described this as “a shift from Bitcoin exposure to exposure to crowd psychology.”

When Valuations Collapsed

The turning point came in October 2025 when Bitcoin fell about 13%. The decline triggered amplified losses in these treasury firms. Strategy’s stock dropped nearly 35% from its peak, while Metaplanet lost over half its market value. The corrections erased most of the summer’s speculative gains and deepened retail losses.

10X Research reported that retail portfolios tied to these digital asset treasuries collectively lost around $17 billion since August. The losses were concentrated among individual investors in the United States, Japan, and Europe. The research described the situation as a “proxy trade gone wrong,” where enthusiasm replaced sound valuation metrics.

Why the Proxies Failed

The core issue was valuation drift. As Bitcoin prices climbed, investors bid up treasury stocks far beyond their intrinsic Bitcoin holdings. When sentiment turned, the same leverage worked in reverse, magnifying declines. These companies were effectively leveraged plays on Bitcoin, funded through debt and equity issuance.

Bitcoin was designed for self-custody and decentralization, yet retail investors found themselves holding corporate intermediaries again. “Equity wrappers for digital assets are not substitutes for the assets themselves,” the 10X Research report stated. The ease of buying shares through stock exchanges came at the cost of higher risk and volatility.

The Broader Market Response

Bloomberg noted that this event could reshape how retail participants approach crypto-related equities. Traders who saw these companies as safer Bitcoin alternatives were reminded of the difference between holding Bitcoin directly and owning companies that speculate on it.

Market data show that after the sell-off, some professional traders began shorting overvalued Bitcoin treasury stocks while going long on Bitcoin itself. Analysts described this as a rebalancing phase, where valuation gaps between equity proxies and spot Bitcoin began to narrow.

This episode also renewed focus on exchange-traded funds and regulated Bitcoin products, which many now see as more transparent vehicles for exposure. For many retail investors, the $17 billion loss serves as a clear warning about the cost of convenience and the risks of treating speculative equities as Bitcoin substitutes.

The post Bitcoin proxy bets through treasury firms wipe out 17 billion losses appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Octavia Logo
Octavia Price(VIA)
$0.0143
$0.0143$0.0143
-10.62%
USD
Octavia (VIA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump’s Tactics Reignite Crypto’s SEC Dialogue

Trump’s Tactics Reignite Crypto’s SEC Dialogue

Prior to Donald Trump’s influence, cryptocurrency companies primarily encountered the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) through legal battles. Under the leadership of former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, the lack of clear guidance from the commission bred a climate of apprehension, leaving businesses in a perplexed state.Continue Reading:Trump’s Tactics Reignite Crypto’s SEC Dialogue
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:08
UK Regulator Proposes New Crypto Rules to Protect Consumers

UK Regulator Proposes New Crypto Rules to Protect Consumers

UK’s FCA proposes crypto rules to boost transparency, protect consumers, and balance innovation with regulation; consultation open until 2026. The United Kingdom has taken a new step toward regulating the fast-growing crypto sector. On Wednesday, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) released a consultation paper that sets out how the existing financial rules should apply to […] The post UK Regulator Proposes New Crypto Rules to Protect Consumers appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2025/09/18 15:30
FCA, crackdown on crypto

FCA, crackdown on crypto

The post FCA, crackdown on crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United Kingdom enters a decisive phase. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated a consultation to set minimum standards on transparency, consumer protection, and digital custody, in order to strengthen market confidence and ensure safer operations for exchanges, wallets, and crypto service providers. The consultation was published on May 2, 2025, and opened a public discussion on operational responsibilities and safeguarding requirements for digital assets (CoinDesk). The goal is to make the rules clearer without hindering the sector’s evolution. According to the data collected by our regulatory monitoring team, in the first weeks following the publication, the feedback received from professionals and operators focused mainly on custody, incident reporting, and insurance requirements. Industry analysts note that many responses require technical clarifications on multi-sig, asset segregation, and recovery protocols, as well as proposals to scale obligations based on the size of the operator. FCA Consultation: What’s on the Table The consultation document clarifies how to apply rules inspired by traditional finance to the crypto perimeter, balancing innovation, market integrity, and user protection. In this context, the goal is to introduce minimum standards for all firms under the supervision of the FCA, an essential step for a more transparent and secure sector, with measurable benefits for users. The proposed pillars Obligations towards consumers: assessment on the extension of the Consumer Duty – a requirement that mandates companies to provide “good outcomes” – to crypto services, with outcomes for users that are traceable and verifiable. Operational resilience: introduction of continuity requirements, incident response plans, and periodic testing to ensure the operational stability of platforms even in adverse scenarios. Financial Crime Prevention: strengthening AML/CFT measures through more stringent transaction monitoring and structured counterpart checks. Custody and safeguarding: definition of operational methods for the segregation of client assets, secure…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:40