CalPERS plans to vote against Elon Musk’s $1 trillion Tesla pay deal, calling it too large and risky for shareholders.CalPERS plans to vote against Elon Musk’s $1 trillion Tesla pay deal, calling it too large and risky for shareholders.

California public pension fund votes against Musk’s $1 trillion Tesla pay deal

2025/10/30 19:51
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), the largest public pension fund in the United States, announced Thursday that it will vote against Elon Musk’s proposed $1 trillion, 10-year compensation package at Tesla Inc.

The fund currently holds approximately 5 million shares in Tesla, with an investment worth more than $2 billion in total.

CalPERS’ statement on the compensation package centered on the total size of the plan and Musk’s power consolidation from the deal. According to the pension fund, the pay deal, “more than pay packages for CEOs in comparable companies by many orders of magnitude,” poses governance risks for regular shareholders.

Tesla’s proposed plan ties Musk’s pay to aggressive performance targets for market capitalization, earnings, and innovation. Following that arrangement, Musk could own more than a quarter of the company, thereby gaining a significant voice on the board.

Musk could earn 12% of Tesla’s stock if the proposal is approved

The shareholder vote is scheduled for November 6, 2025, in Austin, Texas. CalPERS’ opposition is expected to influence other institutional investors, who may weigh in on the package’s governance implications.

In the weeks leading up to Tesla’s annual meeting in Austin, founder Elon Musk has been working hard to win support for the pay deal. He spent much of Tesla’s earnings call this month defending the pay package and criticizing the firms advising investors to reject it.

Under the proposed $1 trillion pay package, Musk would need to meet a series of performance targets over 10 years to receive the total amount — potentially giving him control of at least a quarter of Tesla. The plan would award Musk up to 12% of Tesla’s stock, valued at about $1.03 trillion, provided the automaker grows its market capitalization to $8.6 trillion over the next ten years.

It would also secure Musk’s influence over Tesla and its robotics plans, which he has been publicly demanding since early last year. The firm’s chairwoman, Robyn Denholm, had earlier defended the plan, arguing that it was meant to keep Musk driven and committed to Tesla’s goals.

She noted, “If he performs, if he hits the super ambitious milestones that are in the plan, then he gets equity, it’s 1% for each half a trillion dollars of market cap, plus operational milestones he has to hit in order to do that.” 

However, critics have argued that Musk doesn’t need extra incentives since he already owns the largest stake in Tesla, and that the deal could heighten dilution and governance risks.

Musk’s previous pay arrangements have not escaped controversy either. CalPERS CEO Marcie Frost said last year that the fund voted against his $56 billion proposal.

CalPERS had likewise rejected a 2018 compensation plan valued at over $50 billion. A Delaware judge ultimately voided that package, though Tesla is fighting the decision.

Some investors had considered replacing Musk

Earlier this year, Musk’s open confrontation with President Donald Trump had unsettled some Tesla investors and analysts, who feared it could distract him from the company and even triggered discussion on a possible leadership change.

In July, Musk declared his intention to found a third political party, the “America Party,” in response to his fallout with Trump over tax and spending legislation. However, Tesla’s board has advised investors to vote down a measure seeking a policy of political neutrality, which aimed to increase oversight of Musk’s political involvement.

Douglas Chia, president of Soundboard Governance, said it was clear Musk held considerable influence at Tesla, and he believed the board and investors would once again give him what he wanted.

For now, Tesla’s board has not yet indicated whether it will revise the plan in response to investor concerns. Analysts say the outcome of the vote could set a precedent for future executive compensation packages in tech and growth companies.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Strategy leans on STRC to accelerate Bitcoin buying in 2026

Strategy leans on STRC to accelerate Bitcoin buying in 2026

The post Strategy leans on STRC to accelerate Bitcoin buying in 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy has found a new gear in its Bitcoin accumulation
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/11 03:18
Senator Alsobrooks warns that the CLARITY Act middle ground will leave everyone "a little bit unhappy"

Senator Alsobrooks warns that the CLARITY Act middle ground will leave everyone "a little bit unhappy"

Speaking at the American Bankers Association summit in Washington, US Senator from Maryland, Angela Alsobrooks, spoke bluntly to a room full of community bankers
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/03/11 03:25