A recent Reuters survey shows the Federal Reserve outlook has decisively pivoted. Analysts now widely expect two 25 basis point (bps) rate cuts this year, doubling previous expectations. They strongly anticipate the initial 25 bps reduction at the October 29 FOMC meeting, which should set the Fed Funds Rate target range at 3.75% to 4.00% by year-end. 115 of 117 economists agree on this first move, though two foresee a more aggressive 50 bps cut in December. Trader Conviction High, December Still Contingent The derivatives market shows greater near-term certainty than the economist poll. In fact, rate futures indicate that financial market traders have fully priced in both anticipated rate cuts, showing strong institutional confidence in the dual-cut path for the rest of 2025. However, this strong market signal contrasts with a slight moderation in conviction among economists regarding the final action. For instance, only 71% of surveyed economists support the second reduction scheduled for December. Consequently, this minor divergence highlights Chairman Powell’s stress on data dependency: the timing of that second move will depend more critically on intervening economic reports than on the highly probable October adjustment. 2026 Rate Path: Uncertainty Remains While the immediate easing cycle appears settled, the medium-term outlook extending into 2026 lacks clear consensus, according to the poll data. The survey reveals significant disagreement regarding the interest rate trajectory for the subsequent year, confirming that the terminal rate for this easing cycle remains an unresolved structural question for both policymakers and financial analysts. This polarization within the economic community stems from fundamental debates over long-term forces, including potential productivity shifts and the true level of the natural rate of interest (r*). Because the longer horizon currently lacks a clear economic anchor, the path beyond the year-end target range of 3.75% to 4.00% is highly uncertain.  Consequently, the Federal Reserve will be compelled to rely on a strict, meeting-by-meeting methodology, creating a market dynamic of near-term clarity built upon persistent long-term ambiguity. Macro Context The Federal Reserve’s pivot to an easing cycle offers a key structural lift for risk assets. Expected rate cuts increase financial system liquidity, encouraging capital to flow from low-yield instruments into assets offering greater returns, directly benefiting digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Lower rates typically weaken the U.S. dollar, providing additional support for dollar-denominated crypto holdings. However, the crypto market remains vulnerable to volatility. The recent early October $19 billion liquidation event across Bitcoin and Ethereum starkly demonstrated how swiftly fear and forced selling can happen through ecosystems dependent on high leverage. Learn more: BTC $112K vs. ETH $4200: Which Short Squeeze Hits First? In contrast, corporate treasuries now possess over 1 million BTC, representing a significant portion of the available supply, with the number of corporate owners increasing significantly since mid-2025. This consistent buying acts as a firming base, suggesting that while the market can endure severe corrections driven by over-leveraging, the fundamental conviction in the asset’s future worth endures. Signs of market advancement are also evident in how capital is moving. A leveling off in Bitcoin futures volume is occurring alongside a sharp rise in Ethereum futures volume. This contrast suggests that experienced market participants are actively seeking higher-reward hedging strategies within the broader crypto environment as the more relaxed monetary conditions take effect.  Learn more: SharpLink’s ETH Treasury Surpasses $900M in Unrealized Gains The post Fed Policy: Two Rate Cuts Locked In, 2026 Remains Ambiguous appeared first on NFT Plazas.A recent Reuters survey shows the Federal Reserve outlook has decisively pivoted. Analysts now widely expect two 25 basis point (bps) rate cuts this year, doubling previous expectations. They strongly anticipate the initial 25 bps reduction at the October 29 FOMC meeting, which should set the Fed Funds Rate target range at 3.75% to 4.00% by year-end. 115 of 117 economists agree on this first move, though two foresee a more aggressive 50 bps cut in December. Trader Conviction High, December Still Contingent The derivatives market shows greater near-term certainty than the economist poll. In fact, rate futures indicate that financial market traders have fully priced in both anticipated rate cuts, showing strong institutional confidence in the dual-cut path for the rest of 2025. However, this strong market signal contrasts with a slight moderation in conviction among economists regarding the final action. For instance, only 71% of surveyed economists support the second reduction scheduled for December. Consequently, this minor divergence highlights Chairman Powell’s stress on data dependency: the timing of that second move will depend more critically on intervening economic reports than on the highly probable October adjustment. 2026 Rate Path: Uncertainty Remains While the immediate easing cycle appears settled, the medium-term outlook extending into 2026 lacks clear consensus, according to the poll data. The survey reveals significant disagreement regarding the interest rate trajectory for the subsequent year, confirming that the terminal rate for this easing cycle remains an unresolved structural question for both policymakers and financial analysts. This polarization within the economic community stems from fundamental debates over long-term forces, including potential productivity shifts and the true level of the natural rate of interest (r*). Because the longer horizon currently lacks a clear economic anchor, the path beyond the year-end target range of 3.75% to 4.00% is highly uncertain.  Consequently, the Federal Reserve will be compelled to rely on a strict, meeting-by-meeting methodology, creating a market dynamic of near-term clarity built upon persistent long-term ambiguity. Macro Context The Federal Reserve’s pivot to an easing cycle offers a key structural lift for risk assets. Expected rate cuts increase financial system liquidity, encouraging capital to flow from low-yield instruments into assets offering greater returns, directly benefiting digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Lower rates typically weaken the U.S. dollar, providing additional support for dollar-denominated crypto holdings. However, the crypto market remains vulnerable to volatility. The recent early October $19 billion liquidation event across Bitcoin and Ethereum starkly demonstrated how swiftly fear and forced selling can happen through ecosystems dependent on high leverage. Learn more: BTC $112K vs. ETH $4200: Which Short Squeeze Hits First? In contrast, corporate treasuries now possess over 1 million BTC, representing a significant portion of the available supply, with the number of corporate owners increasing significantly since mid-2025. This consistent buying acts as a firming base, suggesting that while the market can endure severe corrections driven by over-leveraging, the fundamental conviction in the asset’s future worth endures. Signs of market advancement are also evident in how capital is moving. A leveling off in Bitcoin futures volume is occurring alongside a sharp rise in Ethereum futures volume. This contrast suggests that experienced market participants are actively seeking higher-reward hedging strategies within the broader crypto environment as the more relaxed monetary conditions take effect.  Learn more: SharpLink’s ETH Treasury Surpasses $900M in Unrealized Gains The post Fed Policy: Two Rate Cuts Locked In, 2026 Remains Ambiguous appeared first on NFT Plazas.

Fed Policy: Two Rate Cuts Locked In, 2026 Remains Ambiguous

Fed Policy: Two Cuts Locked In, 2026 Remains Ambiguous

A recent Reuters survey shows the Federal Reserve outlook has decisively pivoted. Analysts now widely expect two 25 basis point (bps) rate cuts this year, doubling previous expectations.

They strongly anticipate the initial 25 bps reduction at the October 29 FOMC meeting, which should set the Fed Funds Rate target range at 3.75% to 4.00% by year-end. 115 of 117 economists agree on this first move, though two foresee a more aggressive 50 bps cut in December.

Trader Conviction High, December Still Contingent

The derivatives market shows greater near-term certainty than the economist poll. In fact, rate futures indicate that financial market traders have fully priced in both anticipated rate cuts, showing strong institutional confidence in the dual-cut path for the rest of 2025.

However, this strong market signal contrasts with a slight moderation in conviction among economists regarding the final action. For instance, only 71% of surveyed economists support the second reduction scheduled for December. Consequently, this minor divergence highlights Chairman Powell’s stress on data dependency: the timing of that second move will depend more critically on intervening economic reports than on the highly probable October adjustment.

2026 Rate Path: Uncertainty Remains

While the immediate easing cycle appears settled, the medium-term outlook extending into 2026 lacks clear consensus, according to the poll data. The survey reveals significant disagreement regarding the interest rate trajectory for the subsequent year, confirming that the terminal rate for this easing cycle remains an unresolved structural question for both policymakers and financial analysts.

This polarization within the economic community stems from fundamental debates over long-term forces, including potential productivity shifts and the true level of the natural rate of interest (r*). Because the longer horizon currently lacks a clear economic anchor, the path beyond the year-end target range of 3.75% to 4.00% is highly uncertain. 

Consequently, the Federal Reserve will be compelled to rely on a strict, meeting-by-meeting methodology, creating a market dynamic of near-term clarity built upon persistent long-term ambiguity.

Macro Context

The Federal Reserve’s pivot to an easing cycle offers a key structural lift for risk assets. Expected rate cuts increase financial system liquidity, encouraging capital to flow from low-yield instruments into assets offering greater returns, directly benefiting digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Lower rates typically weaken the U.S. dollar, providing additional support for dollar-denominated crypto holdings.

However, the crypto market remains vulnerable to volatility. The recent early October $19 billion liquidation event across Bitcoin and Ethereum starkly demonstrated how swiftly fear and forced selling can happen through ecosystems dependent on high leverage.

In contrast, corporate treasuries now possess over 1 million BTC, representing a significant portion of the available supply, with the number of corporate owners increasing significantly since mid-2025. This consistent buying acts as a firming base, suggesting that while the market can endure severe corrections driven by over-leveraging, the fundamental conviction in the asset’s future worth endures.Macro Context

Signs of market advancement are also evident in how capital is moving. A leveling off in Bitcoin futures volume is occurring alongside a sharp rise in Ethereum futures volume. This contrast suggests that experienced market participants are actively seeking higher-reward hedging strategies within the broader crypto environment as the more relaxed monetary conditions take effect. 

The post Fed Policy: Two Rate Cuts Locked In, 2026 Remains Ambiguous appeared first on NFT Plazas.

Market Opportunity
Nowchain Logo
Nowchain Price(NOW)
$0.00129
$0.00129$0.00129
+4.03%
USD
Nowchain (NOW) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase’s CEO Armstrong Highlights Support for Crypto Clarity Act

Coinbase’s CEO Armstrong Highlights Support for Crypto Clarity Act

TLDR Coinbase plans to offer Bitcoin-backed credit cards with up to 4% rewards. The Crypto Clarity Act aims to clarify U.S. regulations for stablecoins and crypto. Coinbase is exploring stablecoin yield programs with returns up to 10%. Armstrong highlights the need for clear crypto laws to drive Coinbase’s growth. Coinbase’s CEO, Brian Armstrong, is optimistic [...] The post Coinbase’s CEO Armstrong Highlights Support for Crypto Clarity Act appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/20 19:50
Why losing THIS support could drag XRP toward $1

Why losing THIS support could drag XRP toward $1

The post Why losing THIS support could drag XRP toward $1 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Rising activity clashes with weakening momentum as XRP price struggles
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/31 03:24
How The Washington Nationals Can Pull Themselves Out Of The Basement

How The Washington Nationals Can Pull Themselves Out Of The Basement

The post How The Washington Nationals Can Pull Themselves Out Of The Basement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Washington Nationals interim manager Miguel Cairo (22) in action during the first baseball game of a doubleheader against the Atlanta Braves, Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Nick Wass) Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Problems on the field can be fixed in a variety of ways. Problems off the field are more complicated, especially at the ownership level. That makes today’s Washington Post report on the Washington Nationals’ messy leadership structure that much more disturbing. The report, published by Barry Svrluga, Andrew Golden, and Chelsea Janes, detailed multiple inside sources criticizing the team’s leadership as “directionless.” It alleges that there are 10 members of the Lerner family making ownership-level decisions, preventing the franchise from having a unified voice. They haven’t employed a team president since 2010. At 62-92, the Nationals have already guaranteed another last-place finish in the National League East, their fourth in five years. Since winning the 2019 World Series, they haven’t won more than 71 games in a season. The Nationals fired president of baseball operations Mike Rizzo and manager Dave Martinez in July. They’ve been run by interim general manager Mike DeBartolo and interim manager Miguel Cairo since then, but they will need to make permanent hires in those critical roles early in the offseason. Their next leadership structure may or may not have significant changes from the current one. Regardless of how that plays out, they need to rethink their rebuild to climb out of the basement. The Nationals have three building blocks who were all acquired from the San Diego Padres in the Juan Soto trade. Shortstop CJ Abrams leads the team with 3.9 WAR (Baseball-Reference version) thanks to his 18 home runs and 31 stolen bases. Left fielder James Wood is hitting .254/.349/.461 with 27 home runs and 3.5…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/21 04:33