The post How To Lead When Your Team Knows More Than You Do Due To Access To AI appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. How To Lead When Your Team Knows More Than You Do Due To Access To AI getty There was a time when leaders were expected to have all the answers, but that has changed. Today, anyone can ask AI and find information faster than their boss. It is an odd shift that can feel uncomfortable for people who have built their reputation on being experts. I was fortunate to interview author, Kevin Kruse, many years ago. He wrote a Forbes article back then about leading people with more experience, but AI has added a new layer since then. Now, the challenge is not only about expertise. It is about how leaders handle authority when knowledge is everywhere. Leaders used to earn trust because they usually had the most experience. Now, even the newest team member can ask a tool like ChatGPT and find data or insights the leader has not seen. It’s like how patients can look up their medications and know just as much or sometimes more than their doctors. The power dynamic has shifted. It can feel intimidating when information is so widely available. The leader’s value no longer comes from what they know but from how they guide others to use what they know. Why AI Changed How Leadership Works getty Why AI Changed How Leadership Works AI changed the knowledge hierarchy. Leadership used to be about having access to information. Now, if everyone has it, the problem is not access anymore. It is understanding what to do with all that knowledge. Leaders who rely on authority built on information alone are finding that it no longer works. Like the doctor whose patient shows up with a printout of what they read online, the leader must adapt from being the expert who knows, to the coach who… The post How To Lead When Your Team Knows More Than You Do Due To Access To AI appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. How To Lead When Your Team Knows More Than You Do Due To Access To AI getty There was a time when leaders were expected to have all the answers, but that has changed. Today, anyone can ask AI and find information faster than their boss. It is an odd shift that can feel uncomfortable for people who have built their reputation on being experts. I was fortunate to interview author, Kevin Kruse, many years ago. He wrote a Forbes article back then about leading people with more experience, but AI has added a new layer since then. Now, the challenge is not only about expertise. It is about how leaders handle authority when knowledge is everywhere. Leaders used to earn trust because they usually had the most experience. Now, even the newest team member can ask a tool like ChatGPT and find data or insights the leader has not seen. It’s like how patients can look up their medications and know just as much or sometimes more than their doctors. The power dynamic has shifted. It can feel intimidating when information is so widely available. The leader’s value no longer comes from what they know but from how they guide others to use what they know. Why AI Changed How Leadership Works getty Why AI Changed How Leadership Works AI changed the knowledge hierarchy. Leadership used to be about having access to information. Now, if everyone has it, the problem is not access anymore. It is understanding what to do with all that knowledge. Leaders who rely on authority built on information alone are finding that it no longer works. Like the doctor whose patient shows up with a printout of what they read online, the leader must adapt from being the expert who knows, to the coach who…

How To Lead When Your Team Knows More Than You Do Due To Access To AI

2025/11/08 22:39

How To Lead When Your Team Knows More Than You Do Due To Access To AI

getty

There was a time when leaders were expected to have all the answers, but that has changed. Today, anyone can ask AI and find information faster than their boss. It is an odd shift that can feel uncomfortable for people who have built their reputation on being experts. I was fortunate to interview author, Kevin Kruse, many years ago. He wrote a Forbes article back then about leading people with more experience, but AI has added a new layer since then. Now, the challenge is not only about expertise. It is about how leaders handle authority when knowledge is everywhere. Leaders used to earn trust because they usually had the most experience. Now, even the newest team member can ask a tool like ChatGPT and find data or insights the leader has not seen. It’s like how patients can look up their medications and know just as much or sometimes more than their doctors. The power dynamic has shifted. It can feel intimidating when information is so widely available. The leader’s value no longer comes from what they know but from how they guide others to use what they know.

Why AI Changed How Leadership Works

getty

Why AI Changed How Leadership Works

AI changed the knowledge hierarchy. Leadership used to be about having access to information. Now, if everyone has it, the problem is not access anymore. It is understanding what to do with all that knowledge. Leaders who rely on authority built on information alone are finding that it no longer works. Like the doctor whose patient shows up with a printout of what they read online, the leader must adapt from being the expert who knows, to the coach who helps others make sense of what they find.

Leaders who ignore this shift risk losing credibility. The people who work for them can sense insecurity quickly. They can also tell when someone is confident enough to admit they do not know everything. The best leaders today are not the ones who pretend to be the smartest person in the room, but the ones who create an environment where everyone feels safe asking questions, testing ideas, and sharing what they learn from AI.

Why Insecurity About AI Makes Leaders Less Effective

getty

Why Insecurity About AI Makes Leaders Less Effective

The emotional impact of AI on leaders is real. Many feel they are supposed to have answers at a time when those answers change every day. That pressure creates fear, which can lead to control. When leaders micromanage or shut down new ideas, it often comes from insecurity. My research on curiosity has shown that fear is one of the biggest inhibitors of learning. If leaders are afraid to look uninformed, they stop asking questions. When they stop asking questions, curiosity disappears, and once curiosity is gone, innovation goes with it.

This is not a criticism of leaders. It is human nature. Nobody wants to feel replaced by a tool or outsmarted by their own team. Yet AI is not the enemy. It is an opportunity to strengthen leadership by shifting focus from what we know to how we think. Leaders who can model curiosity about AI, rather than fear, will have more engaged and innovative teams.

How Great Leaders Respond When Their Team Knows More About AI

getty

How Great Leaders Respond When Their Team Knows More About AI

Kevin Kruse told me great leaders focus on growth, recognition, trust, and communication. Those same principles apply here. Growth means encouraging people to learn about AI and share what they discover. Recognition means giving credit to team members who teach others something new. Trust means allowing people to experiment with AI without fear of punishment for mistakes. Communication means creating a two-way exchange where leaders learn as much as they teach.

Great leaders also know how to admit when they are unsure. They say things like, “That is interesting, tell me more about how you found it,” instead of pretending to understand something they do not. That vulnerability builds respect, shows confidence, and creates space for learning. When leaders show curiosity about AI, they send a signal that it is safe for others to do the same, and that builds trust.

How To Stay Relevant When AI Moves Faster Than You Can Learn

getty

How To Stay Relevant When AI Moves Faster Than You Can Learn

Information will always move faster than any leader can keep up with. The goal is not to know everything about AI but to stay open enough to keep learning. Leaders can build learning circles where team members share new AI tools or insights they have found useful. They can ask questions in meetings like, “What new idea did you explore this week?” or “What surprised you about what AI showed you?” These simple actions make curiosity a habit.

The smartest leaders do not try to compete with AI. They use it to enhance judgment because they know it is impossible to outthink a machine. They are learning to ask better questions and develop prompts that get them the best information. They know that leadership now means guiding teams through the challenges of learning how AI can best serve the company. That shift requires humility and courage, but it also creates stronger connections within teams.

The New Meaning Of Leadership Due To AI

getty

The New Meaning Of Leadership Due To AI

AI has forced every leader to redefine what leadership really means. It is no longer about being the authority who knows everything. It is about being the person who can make sense of information, encourage critical thinking, and bring wisdom to the group. Anyone can have data, but what people need is perspective. Leaders who help others interpret, apply, and question what they find will always stay relevant. The most successful leaders will be those who admit they are learning too. They are not afraid to ask their teams what they think, to test ideas together, or to change their minds when they learn something new. They understand that in a world shaped by AI, leadership is about knowing how to learn, listen, and lead with humility. AI may know a lot, but it cannot replace human insight. The future will belong to leaders who recognize that their greatest advantage is not what they know, but how they think, connect, and grow with others. That is what defines great leadership.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dianehamilton/2025/11/08/how-to-lead-when-your-team-knows-more-than-you-do-due-to-access-to-ai/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

The post Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The lead developer of Shiba Inu, Shytoshi Kusama, has publicly addressed the Shibarium bridge exploit that occurred recently, draining $2.4 million from the network. After days of speculation about his involvement in managing the crisis, the project leader broke his silence. Kusama emphasized that a special “war room” has been set up to restore stolen finances and enhance network security. The statement is his first official words since the bridge compromise occurred. “Although I am focusing on AI initiatives to benefit all our tokens, I remain with the developers and leadership in the war room,” Kusama posted on social media platform X. He dismissed claims that he had distanced himself from the project as “utterly preposterous.” The developer said that the reason behind his silence at first was strategic. Before he could make any statements publicly, he must have taken time to evaluate what he termed a complex and deep situation properly. Kusama also vowed to provide further updates in the official Shiba Inu channels as the team comes up with long-term solutions. As highlighted in our previous article, targeted Shibarium’s bridge infrastructure through a sophisticated attack vector. Hackers gained unauthorized access to validator signing keys, compromising the network’s security framework. The hackers executed a flash loan to acquire 4.6 million BONE ShibaSwap tokens. The validator power on the network was majority held by them after this purchase. They were able to transfer assets out of Shibarium with this control. The response of Shibarium developers was timely to limit the breach. They instantly halted all validator functions in order to avoid additional exploitation. The team proceeded to deposit the assets under staking in a multisig hardware wallet that is secure. External security companies were involved in the investigation effort. Hexens, Seal 911, and PeckShield are collaborating with internal developers to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:46