Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO), David ‘JoelKatz’ Schwartz, has reignited the long-running debate over decentralization by pitting the XRP Ledger (XRPL) against other major blockchains. His recent statements have drawn sharp attention across the broader crypto community, particularly for their bold claims about XRP’s role in a truly decentralized financial ecosystem.  Ripple CTO Highlights XRP […]Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO), David ‘JoelKatz’ Schwartz, has reignited the long-running debate over decentralization by pitting the XRP Ledger (XRPL) against other major blockchains. His recent statements have drawn sharp attention across the broader crypto community, particularly for their bold claims about XRP’s role in a truly decentralized financial ecosystem.  Ripple CTO Highlights XRP […]

Ripple CTO Stacks XRP Ledger Against Other Blockchains, What’s The Catch?

2025/11/01 09:00

Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO), David ‘JoelKatz’ Schwartz, has reignited the long-running debate over decentralization by pitting the XRP Ledger (XRPL) against other major blockchains. His recent statements have drawn sharp attention across the broader crypto community, particularly for their bold claims about XRP’s role in a truly decentralized financial ecosystem. 

Ripple CTO Highlights XRP Ledger’s Unique Autonomy

An X social media account named ‘Stellar Ripple’ has spotlighted a statement from Schwartz, underscoring what he sees as a defining difference between the XRP Ledger and other blockchain networks. Stellar Ripple stated in its post on Thursday that the Ripple CTO dropped a “truth bomb,” cutting deep into the philosophy of decentralization within blockchains. 

In his post, Schwartz questioned whether users want to be their own bank or empower another intermediary in disguise. According to him, despite the decentralized branding of blockchain networks, they are ultimately designed for control, allowing certain participants to set the rules, impose transaction fees, and maintain leverage over users’ financial autonomy. 

In contrast, he described the XRP Ledger as a space free from such mediators, government influence, and protocols that could freeze or reverse transactions. This suggests that XRPL represents a purer or more superior interpretation of the decentralization narrative, where every transaction remains unalterable, resistant to censorship, and uncontrolled. 

Schwartz went on to explain that, unlike most digital assets, XRP, the native token of the XRP Ledger, exists as the only counterparty-free currency that anyone in the world can access without risk of default or confiscation. He noted that this unique feature helps XRP gain value from the activity generated on the blockchain network. Essentially, this implies that XRP’s price is intertwined with the growth of the ledger itself, providing a foundational layer that ensures liquidity and stability across every transaction. 

XRPL Expands Into Genomic Data Anchoring

As the XRPL ecosystem continues to grow, real-world adoption is gaining momentum. Crypto commentator John Squire recently pointed out an exciting new development from DNA Protocol, a system that anchors DNA to the XRP Ledger. According to the report, DNAOnChain has officially launched operations in Tunisia, extending its reach to broader markets. Notably, this project marks a significant expansion of XRPL’s use cases by anchoring genomic identity data directly on the blockchain. 

Through DNAOnChain, Squire states that certified laboratories can now securely record and verify genomic data on XRPL, effectively bridging biotechnology with blockchain innovation. The integration is expected to enhance transparency and immutability in medical and genetic research, ensuring that sensitive information is permanently verifiable without compromising privacy. 

More importantly, this new development signals XRPL’s versatility beyond cross-border payments, highlighting its potential as a data integrity layer for real-world applications. It also demonstrates XRP’s growing adoption in new industries beyond digital assets and finance.  

Ripple
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09