Author: 0xhhh I. Introduction: Blind Spots of Trust Blockchain is a revolution in trust, but its trust is closed. It believes in mathematics, but not in the world. Early blockchains resembled a logician: they firmly believed in reasoning but rejected perception. Bitcoin trusts hashes, not people; Ethereum trusts code, not input. So when a contract tries to ask "What is the price of ETH?", it falls silent. This is not a technological flaw, but rather a boundary of philosophy. The certainty of blockchain comes from its separation from the external world. The source of trust is isolation. But without a connection, there is no meaning. The history of humankind building trust systems is a process of constantly allowing the "system" to see "reality" again. The oracle is the first hand reaching out from this crack. It is both a connection and a source of pollution; It was both a breakthrough and the beginning of a crisis. II. First Phase: Cracks in the Cave (2015–2018) Background: Isolated islands of closed intelligence In 2015, Ethereum brought the concept of "code is law" to the world. But the law requires evidence, and there are no "external facts" on the blockchain. A "weather-based compensation" contract cannot know whether it will rain today; A synthetic asset that "tracks stock prices" cannot see Nasdaq. Smart contracts have become prisoners in Plato's Cave, only able to gaze at the shadows on the chain. The very purity of blockchain technology has become its constraint. Question: How to "see" without being contaminated? How can we enable blockchain to see the outside world without being contaminated by it? Trusting external data implies the introduction of subjectivity and centralization, and the purpose of blockchain is precisely to eliminate both. Thus, "trusted input" becomes the first paradox of decentralized trust systems. Technological Evolution Oraclize (Provable): Proves that the data indeed comes from a specific source using TLSNotary. Town Crier (Cornell): Secure data reading using the Intel SGX Trusted Execution Environment. Chainlink (2017): Proposed a decentralized oracle network where nodes stake LINK, aggregate data, and form a weighted consensus. The first breath of trust Blockchain makes trust logical; oracles make trust concrete. Machines learned to "believe" for the first time, while humans began to define truth using algorithms. III. Phase Two: The Market for Truth (2019–2021) Background: Trust Famine in DeFi The DeFi boom has made price feeds the lifeline of the system. Liquidation, derivatives, stablecoins, and synthetic assets all rely on external prices. However, price manipulation once could trigger a chain reaction. The truth has become a resource that can be arbitrageurized. Technological Evolution Tellor (TRB): The truth emerges through a game of negotiation using a collateral and challenge mechanism. UMA (Optimistic Oracle): Trusted by default until challenged. Kleros (PNK): Decentralized jury verdicts on factual disputes. Band Protocol / DIA: Introduces a compromise solution at the API layer, balancing speed and reliability. The era of trust games Tellor makes the truth the equilibrium in the game. UMA makes the truth the default state. Kleros makes truth a social contract. Trust is no longer a list, but the result of a game. The truth was "marketized" for the first time. IV. The Third Phase: The War of Time (2021–2023) Background: The Crisis of Delayed Truth In the era of high-frequency trading and clearing, latency is a risk. When the truth is slower than a lie, the system will punish the truth. Technological Evolution Pyth Network (PYTH): Quotes are directly signed by exchanges, with the source being the nodes. RedStone (RED): Pull price feeds on demand, and verify immediately upon execution. API3: First-party oracle, data sources sign and publish themselves. Band Protocol: Implementing a cross-chain data layer on Cosmos. When time becomes the shape of truth Trust has shifted from "correct" to "timely". Oracles have become "arbiters of time". Delay becomes a new dimension of trust. ???? Trust Begins to Have a Price: The Awakening of OEV (2023–2024) OEV (Oracle Extractable Value) — The arbitrage difference between truth and time. The moment a price is updated is not only an informational event, but also a value-driven event. The order in which the truth is disseminated begins to determine the distribution of wealth. The question is no longer "whether it is true or not", but "who benefits from the truth". Technological and Mechanism Evolution Chainlink OEV Network (2024): Creates an OEV auction marketplace that allows priority update rights to be bid on. Pyth / SEDA: Suppressing internal arbitrage through timestamp signatures and random committees. RedStone Pull Mode: Naturally eliminates time lag and leaves no arbitrage window. The truth begins to be priced. OEV gives trust economic weight. In the past, we discussed "who is telling the truth," Now we need to discuss "who benefits from telling the truth". Trust extends from fact verification to value governance. V. Phase Four: The Collision Between Intelligence and Privacy (2023–2025) Background: AI Entering the Trust System AI models can judge the market and analyze news, but their "truthfulness" cannot be verified. When machines begin to determine the truth, how do we judge the machines? Technological Evolution Oraichain (ORAI): Proof of Execution (AI Inference). Phala / iExec: Generate remote proofs using TEE trusted hardware. SEDA / Supra / Entangle: Integrating AI verification with cross-chain synchronization. Verification of reason When we ask machines to prove their rationality, Oracle has transformed from "verifying the world" to "verifying intelligence". Trust extends to the judgment layer. VI. Fifth Stage: Trust Rebuilding in the Agent Era (2025 →) Background: The Rise of AI Agents AI agents already possess economic behavior capabilities. They sign contracts, negotiate partnerships, and execute transactions. But algorithms have no ethics, only inputs. When intelligent agents trade with each other, who guarantees that they are seeing the same world? Technological Evolution Sora Oracle (SORA): AI Oracle + Payment Protocol + Prediction Market, forming a cognitive self-correction system. Flux / OptionRoom: Embedded prediction markets for fact verification. Orochi Network: Building a machine identity system to make judgments traceable. Rebuilding Trust When intelligent agents become the main body of society, humans transform from "trust bearers" to "trust designers". Trust between machines is not based on emotion, but on protocols. Oracle has transformed from a data interface into a civilization structure. VII. Epilogue: From Data Bridge to Intelligent Trust Layer Ten years of evolution, each upgrade of Oracle All of this stemmed from a crisis of trust, and it also opened up new frontiers. Blockchain makes trust computable; Oracle makes reality computable; AI Oracle makes intelligence computable. Oracle is no longer just a bridge, but a trust layer for intelligent civilization. In conclusion If blockchain is the memory layer of civilization, then Oracle is the sensory layer of civilization. We are teaching machines something they've never done before: how to perceive honestly. When the intelligent society truly arrives, Oracle will not only transmit data, but also the form of truth.Author: 0xhhh I. Introduction: Blind Spots of Trust Blockchain is a revolution in trust, but its trust is closed. It believes in mathematics, but not in the world. Early blockchains resembled a logician: they firmly believed in reasoning but rejected perception. Bitcoin trusts hashes, not people; Ethereum trusts code, not input. So when a contract tries to ask "What is the price of ETH?", it falls silent. This is not a technological flaw, but rather a boundary of philosophy. The certainty of blockchain comes from its separation from the external world. The source of trust is isolation. But without a connection, there is no meaning. The history of humankind building trust systems is a process of constantly allowing the "system" to see "reality" again. The oracle is the first hand reaching out from this crack. It is both a connection and a source of pollution; It was both a breakthrough and the beginning of a crisis. II. First Phase: Cracks in the Cave (2015–2018) Background: Isolated islands of closed intelligence In 2015, Ethereum brought the concept of "code is law" to the world. But the law requires evidence, and there are no "external facts" on the blockchain. A "weather-based compensation" contract cannot know whether it will rain today; A synthetic asset that "tracks stock prices" cannot see Nasdaq. Smart contracts have become prisoners in Plato's Cave, only able to gaze at the shadows on the chain. The very purity of blockchain technology has become its constraint. Question: How to "see" without being contaminated? How can we enable blockchain to see the outside world without being contaminated by it? Trusting external data implies the introduction of subjectivity and centralization, and the purpose of blockchain is precisely to eliminate both. Thus, "trusted input" becomes the first paradox of decentralized trust systems. Technological Evolution Oraclize (Provable): Proves that the data indeed comes from a specific source using TLSNotary. Town Crier (Cornell): Secure data reading using the Intel SGX Trusted Execution Environment. Chainlink (2017): Proposed a decentralized oracle network where nodes stake LINK, aggregate data, and form a weighted consensus. The first breath of trust Blockchain makes trust logical; oracles make trust concrete. Machines learned to "believe" for the first time, while humans began to define truth using algorithms. III. Phase Two: The Market for Truth (2019–2021) Background: Trust Famine in DeFi The DeFi boom has made price feeds the lifeline of the system. Liquidation, derivatives, stablecoins, and synthetic assets all rely on external prices. However, price manipulation once could trigger a chain reaction. The truth has become a resource that can be arbitrageurized. Technological Evolution Tellor (TRB): The truth emerges through a game of negotiation using a collateral and challenge mechanism. UMA (Optimistic Oracle): Trusted by default until challenged. Kleros (PNK): Decentralized jury verdicts on factual disputes. Band Protocol / DIA: Introduces a compromise solution at the API layer, balancing speed and reliability. The era of trust games Tellor makes the truth the equilibrium in the game. UMA makes the truth the default state. Kleros makes truth a social contract. Trust is no longer a list, but the result of a game. The truth was "marketized" for the first time. IV. The Third Phase: The War of Time (2021–2023) Background: The Crisis of Delayed Truth In the era of high-frequency trading and clearing, latency is a risk. When the truth is slower than a lie, the system will punish the truth. Technological Evolution Pyth Network (PYTH): Quotes are directly signed by exchanges, with the source being the nodes. RedStone (RED): Pull price feeds on demand, and verify immediately upon execution. API3: First-party oracle, data sources sign and publish themselves. Band Protocol: Implementing a cross-chain data layer on Cosmos. When time becomes the shape of truth Trust has shifted from "correct" to "timely". Oracles have become "arbiters of time". Delay becomes a new dimension of trust. ???? Trust Begins to Have a Price: The Awakening of OEV (2023–2024) OEV (Oracle Extractable Value) — The arbitrage difference between truth and time. The moment a price is updated is not only an informational event, but also a value-driven event. The order in which the truth is disseminated begins to determine the distribution of wealth. The question is no longer "whether it is true or not", but "who benefits from the truth". Technological and Mechanism Evolution Chainlink OEV Network (2024): Creates an OEV auction marketplace that allows priority update rights to be bid on. Pyth / SEDA: Suppressing internal arbitrage through timestamp signatures and random committees. RedStone Pull Mode: Naturally eliminates time lag and leaves no arbitrage window. The truth begins to be priced. OEV gives trust economic weight. In the past, we discussed "who is telling the truth," Now we need to discuss "who benefits from telling the truth". Trust extends from fact verification to value governance. V. Phase Four: The Collision Between Intelligence and Privacy (2023–2025) Background: AI Entering the Trust System AI models can judge the market and analyze news, but their "truthfulness" cannot be verified. When machines begin to determine the truth, how do we judge the machines? Technological Evolution Oraichain (ORAI): Proof of Execution (AI Inference). Phala / iExec: Generate remote proofs using TEE trusted hardware. SEDA / Supra / Entangle: Integrating AI verification with cross-chain synchronization. Verification of reason When we ask machines to prove their rationality, Oracle has transformed from "verifying the world" to "verifying intelligence". Trust extends to the judgment layer. VI. Fifth Stage: Trust Rebuilding in the Agent Era (2025 →) Background: The Rise of AI Agents AI agents already possess economic behavior capabilities. They sign contracts, negotiate partnerships, and execute transactions. But algorithms have no ethics, only inputs. When intelligent agents trade with each other, who guarantees that they are seeing the same world? Technological Evolution Sora Oracle (SORA): AI Oracle + Payment Protocol + Prediction Market, forming a cognitive self-correction system. Flux / OptionRoom: Embedded prediction markets for fact verification. Orochi Network: Building a machine identity system to make judgments traceable. Rebuilding Trust When intelligent agents become the main body of society, humans transform from "trust bearers" to "trust designers". Trust between machines is not based on emotion, but on protocols. Oracle has transformed from a data interface into a civilization structure. VII. Epilogue: From Data Bridge to Intelligent Trust Layer Ten years of evolution, each upgrade of Oracle All of this stemmed from a crisis of trust, and it also opened up new frontiers. Blockchain makes trust computable; Oracle makes reality computable; AI Oracle makes intelligence computable. Oracle is no longer just a bridge, but a trust layer for intelligent civilization. In conclusion If blockchain is the memory layer of civilization, then Oracle is the sensory layer of civilization. We are teaching machines something they've never done before: how to perceive honestly. When the intelligent society truly arrives, Oracle will not only transmit data, but also the form of truth.

The Evolution of Oracles (Part 1): From Data Bridge to Intelligent Trust Layer

2025/11/14 15:00

Author: 0xhhh

I. Introduction: Blind Spots of Trust

Blockchain is a revolution in trust, but its trust is closed.

It believes in mathematics, but not in the world.

Early blockchains resembled a logician: they firmly believed in reasoning but rejected perception.

Bitcoin trusts hashes, not people; Ethereum trusts code, not input.

So when a contract tries to ask "What is the price of ETH?", it falls silent.

This is not a technological flaw, but rather a boundary of philosophy.

The certainty of blockchain comes from its separation from the external world.

The source of trust is isolation.

But without a connection, there is no meaning.

The history of humankind building trust systems is a process of constantly allowing the "system" to see "reality" again.

The oracle is the first hand reaching out from this crack.

It is both a connection and a source of pollution;

It was both a breakthrough and the beginning of a crisis.

II. First Phase: Cracks in the Cave (2015–2018)

Background: Isolated islands of closed intelligence

In 2015, Ethereum brought the concept of "code is law" to the world.

But the law requires evidence, and there are no "external facts" on the blockchain.

A "weather-based compensation" contract cannot know whether it will rain today;

A synthetic asset that "tracks stock prices" cannot see Nasdaq.

Smart contracts have become prisoners in Plato's Cave, only able to gaze at the shadows on the chain.

The very purity of blockchain technology has become its constraint.

Question: How to "see" without being contaminated?

How can we enable blockchain to see the outside world without being contaminated by it?

Trusting external data implies the introduction of subjectivity and centralization, and the purpose of blockchain is precisely to eliminate both.

Thus, "trusted input" becomes the first paradox of decentralized trust systems.

Technological Evolution

  • Oraclize (Provable): Proves that the data indeed comes from a specific source using TLSNotary.
  • Town Crier (Cornell): Secure data reading using the Intel SGX Trusted Execution Environment.
  • Chainlink (2017): Proposed a decentralized oracle network where nodes stake LINK, aggregate data, and form a weighted consensus.

The first breath of trust

Blockchain makes trust logical; oracles make trust concrete.

Machines learned to "believe" for the first time, while humans began to define truth using algorithms.

III. Phase Two: The Market for Truth (2019–2021)

Background: Trust Famine in DeFi

The DeFi boom has made price feeds the lifeline of the system.

Liquidation, derivatives, stablecoins, and synthetic assets all rely on external prices.

However, price manipulation once could trigger a chain reaction.

The truth has become a resource that can be arbitrageurized.

Technological Evolution

  • Tellor (TRB): The truth emerges through a game of negotiation using a collateral and challenge mechanism.
  • UMA (Optimistic Oracle): Trusted by default until challenged.
  • Kleros (PNK): Decentralized jury verdicts on factual disputes.
  • Band Protocol / DIA: Introduces a compromise solution at the API layer, balancing speed and reliability.

The era of trust games

Tellor makes the truth the equilibrium in the game.

UMA makes the truth the default state.

Kleros makes truth a social contract.

Trust is no longer a list, but the result of a game.

The truth was "marketized" for the first time.

IV. The Third Phase: The War of Time (2021–2023)

Background: The Crisis of Delayed Truth

In the era of high-frequency trading and clearing, latency is a risk.

When the truth is slower than a lie, the system will punish the truth.

Technological Evolution

  • Pyth Network (PYTH): Quotes are directly signed by exchanges, with the source being the nodes.
  • RedStone (RED): Pull price feeds on demand, and verify immediately upon execution.
  • API3: First-party oracle, data sources sign and publish themselves.
  • Band Protocol: Implementing a cross-chain data layer on Cosmos.

When time becomes the shape of truth

Trust has shifted from "correct" to "timely".

Oracles have become "arbiters of time".

Delay becomes a new dimension of trust.

???? Trust Begins to Have a Price: The Awakening of OEV (2023–2024)

OEV (Oracle Extractable Value)

— The arbitrage difference between truth and time.

The moment a price is updated is not only an informational event, but also a value-driven event.

The order in which the truth is disseminated begins to determine the distribution of wealth.

The question is no longer "whether it is true or not", but "who benefits from the truth".

Technological and Mechanism Evolution

Chainlink OEV Network (2024): Creates an OEV auction marketplace that allows priority update rights to be bid on.

Pyth / SEDA: Suppressing internal arbitrage through timestamp signatures and random committees.

RedStone Pull Mode: Naturally eliminates time lag and leaves no arbitrage window.

The truth begins to be priced.

OEV gives trust economic weight.

In the past, we discussed "who is telling the truth,"

Now we need to discuss "who benefits from telling the truth".

Trust extends from fact verification to value governance.

V. Phase Four: The Collision Between Intelligence and Privacy (2023–2025)

Background: AI Entering the Trust System

AI models can judge the market and analyze news, but their "truthfulness" cannot be verified.

When machines begin to determine the truth, how do we judge the machines?

Technological Evolution

  • Oraichain (ORAI): Proof of Execution (AI Inference).
  • Phala / iExec: Generate remote proofs using TEE trusted hardware.
  • SEDA / Supra / Entangle: Integrating AI verification with cross-chain synchronization.

Verification of reason

When we ask machines to prove their rationality,

Oracle has transformed from "verifying the world" to "verifying intelligence".

Trust extends to the judgment layer.

VI. Fifth Stage: Trust Rebuilding in the Agent Era (2025 →)

Background: The Rise of AI Agents

AI agents already possess economic behavior capabilities.

They sign contracts, negotiate partnerships, and execute transactions.

But algorithms have no ethics, only inputs.

Technological Evolution

  • Sora Oracle (SORA): AI Oracle + Payment Protocol + Prediction Market, forming a cognitive self-correction system.
  • Flux / OptionRoom: Embedded prediction markets for fact verification.
  • Orochi Network: Building a machine identity system to make judgments traceable.

Rebuilding Trust

When intelligent agents become the main body of society, humans transform from "trust bearers" to "trust designers".

Trust between machines is not based on emotion, but on protocols.

Oracle has transformed from a data interface into a civilization structure.

VII. Epilogue: From Data Bridge to Intelligent Trust Layer

Ten years of evolution, each upgrade of Oracle

All of this stemmed from a crisis of trust, and it also opened up new frontiers.

Oracle is no longer just a bridge, but a trust layer for intelligent civilization.

In conclusion

If blockchain is the memory layer of civilization, then Oracle is the sensory layer of civilization.

We are teaching machines something they've never done before: how to perceive honestly.

When the intelligent society truly arrives, Oracle will not only transmit data, but also the form of truth.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight

American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight

The post American Bitcoin’s $5B Nasdaq Debut Puts Trump-Backed Miner in Crypto Spotlight appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: American Bitcoin (ABTC) surged nearly 85% on its Nasdaq debut, briefly reaching a $5B valuation. The Trump family, alongside Hut 8 Mining, controls 98% of the newly merged crypto-mining entity. Eric Trump called Bitcoin “modern-day gold,” predicting it could reach $1 million per coin. American Bitcoin, a fast-rising crypto mining firm with strong political and institutional backing, has officially entered Wall Street. After merging with Gryphon Digital Mining, the company made its Nasdaq debut under the ticker ABTC, instantly drawing global attention to both its stock performance and its bold vision for Bitcoin’s future. Read More: Trump-Backed Crypto Firm Eyes Asia for Bold Bitcoin Expansion Nasdaq Debut: An Explosive First Day ABTC’s first day of trading proved as dramatic as expected. Shares surged almost 85% at the open, touching a peak of $14 before settling at lower levels by the close. That initial spike valued the company around $5 billion, positioning it as one of 2025’s most-watched listings. At the last session, ABTC has been trading at $7.28 per share, which is a small positive 2.97% per day. Although the price has decelerated since opening highs, analysts note that the company has been off to a strong start and early investor activity is a hard-to-find feat in a newly-launched crypto mining business. According to market watchers, the listing comes at a time of new momentum in the digital asset markets. With Bitcoin trading above $110,000 this quarter, American Bitcoin’s entry comes at a time when both institutional investors and retail traders are showing heightened interest in exposure to Bitcoin-linked equities. Ownership Structure: Trump Family and Hut 8 at the Helm Its management and ownership set up has increased the visibility of the company. The Trump family and the Canadian mining giant Hut 8 Mining jointly own 98 percent…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:33