The post FTX Bankruptcy Lawsuit Targets Genesis Digital Assets in $1 Billion Clawback appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The long-running FTX bankruptcy case has entered a new chapter. The FTX Recovery Trust is now suing crypto mining company Genesis Digital Assets (GDA) in an effort to claw back more than $1 billion. The lawsuit highlights how deeply Sam Bankman-Fried’s financial decisions continue to impact creditors two years after FTX’s collapse. Lawsuit Claims Inflated …The post FTX Bankruptcy Lawsuit Targets Genesis Digital Assets in $1 Billion Clawback appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The long-running FTX bankruptcy case has entered a new chapter. The FTX Recovery Trust is now suing crypto mining company Genesis Digital Assets (GDA) in an effort to claw back more than $1 billion. The lawsuit highlights how deeply Sam Bankman-Fried’s financial decisions continue to impact creditors two years after FTX’s collapse. Lawsuit Claims Inflated …

FTX Bankruptcy Lawsuit Targets Genesis Digital Assets in $1 Billion Clawback

2025/09/24 13:12
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
FTX Bankruptcy Lawsuit

The post FTX Bankruptcy Lawsuit Targets Genesis Digital Assets in $1 Billion Clawback appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

The long-running FTX bankruptcy case has entered a new chapter. The FTX Recovery Trust is now suing crypto mining company Genesis Digital Assets (GDA) in an effort to claw back more than $1 billion. The lawsuit highlights how deeply Sam Bankman-Fried’s financial decisions continue to impact creditors two years after FTX’s collapse.

Lawsuit Claims Inflated Investments in Crypto Mining Firm

Filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, the complaint alleges that Sam Bankman-Fried directed Alameda Research, FTX’s sister trading firm, to funnel customer funds into GDA at inflated prices.

According to the filing, between 2021 and 2022, Alameda:

  • Spent over $500 million on 154 preferred shares of GDA.
  • Wired another $550.9 million directly to GDA’s co-founders, Rashit Makhat and Marco Krohn.

The lawsuit argues these deals were not just reckless but deliberately structured to benefit Bankman-Fried personally. Since he owned 90% of Alameda, he would “capture nearly all the upside from GDA’s inflated valuation while shifting the financial risks onto FTX customers and creditors,” the complaint states.

Red Flags in Kazakhstan Energy Crisis Ignored

The FTX Recovery Trust lawsuit also highlights that Bankman-Fried disregarded significant warning signs. At the time of the investment, Kazakhstan—where GDA was based—was experiencing a severe energy crisis, raising concerns about the company’s future operations.

The filing claims Bankman-Fried relied on financial statements that “bore no relation to reality,” showing what the trust describes as mismanagement and disregard for customer funds.

“These were commingled and misappropriated funds,” the lawsuit says, framing the GDA deals as another chapter in Bankman-Fried’s broader fraud.

  • Also Read :
  •   FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Faces Appeal on November 4
  •   ,

FTX Recovery Trust Continues Clawback Efforts

This lawsuit is just one part of ongoing recovery efforts. In 2023, a U.S. bankruptcy court approved a $175 million settlement with Genesis Global Trading, a separate entity from GDA.

Meanwhile, the restructuring team has been working to return money to FTX customers and creditors. So far, the trust has distributed:

  • $1.2 billion earlier this year
  • $5 billion in May 2025
  • A fresh payout of $1.6 billion is scheduled for September 30, 2025

Each successful clawback brings creditors closer to recovering lost funds, though the process remains long and litigious.

Bankman-Fried’s Legacy of Fraud Still Haunts Creditors

Sam Bankman-Fried is already serving time for fraud, but the FTX bankruptcy litigation shows the ripple effects of his decisions continue. The GDA lawsuit underscores the scale of alleged mismanagement and the difficult task of untangling the exchange’s financial web.

For creditors, the hope is clear that every lawsuit and settlement is one step closer to recovering billions lost in the FTX collapse.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

Why is the FTX Recovery Trust suing Genesis Digital Assets?

The FTX Recovery Trust is suing to claw back over $1 billion that Sam Bankman-Fried allegedly funneled into Genesis Digital Assets at inflated prices, using FTX customer funds.

What is the basis of the lawsuit against Genesis Digital Assets?

The lawsuit claims Sam Bankman-Fried used customer funds to buy GDA shares at inflated prices and wired over $550 million directly to its founders, ignoring financial red flags.

How does the Genesis Digital Assets lawsuit affect FTX creditors?

Each successful lawsuit, like this one against GDA, helps recover funds. The money is then distributed to creditors, bringing them closer to recovering their lost investments.

What are “clawback” lawsuits in the FTX bankruptcy case?

“Clawback” lawsuits are legal actions taken to recover funds that were improperly or fraudulently transferred out of FTX before its collapse, so they can be returned to creditors.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

The post ‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Eric Trump, the son of U.S. President
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/05 18:19
Pi Network (PI) climbs on Pi Day update, token unlocks risk

Pi Network (PI) climbs on Pi Day update, token unlocks risk

Pi Network (PI) rally as Bitcoin meets $74,000 resistance Pi Network’s PI outperformed the broader crypto market, notching a multi-week high while Bitcoin stalled
Share
CoinLive2026/03/05 18:39