A sybil farming attack on WUSD.fi and GLOVE drained roughly $200K from Uniswap V3 liquidity pools on Ethereum. No audit caught the reward mechanic flaw. SomebodyA sybil farming attack on WUSD.fi and GLOVE drained roughly $200K from Uniswap V3 liquidity pools on Ethereum. No audit caught the reward mechanic flaw. Somebody

WUSD.fi Sybil Farming Attack Drains $200K from GLOVE Pools

2026/05/27 06:00
2 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

A sybil farming attack on WUSD.fi and GLOVE drained roughly $200K from Uniswap V3 liquidity pools on Ethereum. No audit caught the reward mechanic flaw.

Somebody figured out the math before the protocol did. On May 25, a single attacker walked away with roughly $200K from two Uniswap V3 pools tied to the WUSD.fi and GLOVE protocol on Ethereum. Not a bug in the contract code exactly. More a case of a reward mechanism that never asked who it was rewarding.

WUSD.fi Sybil Farming Attack Drains $200K from GLOVE Pools

Blockchain security researcher exvulsec flagged the incident on X, laying out the full on-chain trail. The attacker used a flash loan, cycled through fresh wallets, and dumped harvested GLOVE tokens into the liquidity pools before anyone caught it.

The Mechanic Nobody Stress-Tested

Inside WUSD.fi’s contract sits a function called WUSD._englove. According to exvulsec on X, any fresh wallet wrapping at least 100 WUSD while holding under 2 GLOVE could call Glove.mintCreditless and receive up to 2 GLOVE tokens. No identity check. No rate limit. Nothing.

The attacker deployed EIP-7702 helper contracts, pulled a Morpho USDT flash loan, then ran repeated wrap and unwrap cycles across fresh wallet addresses. Each new address qualified again. GLOVE kept minting.

Harvested GLOVE went straight into Uniswap V3. The GLO-USDC pool lost 11,702 USDC in observable drains. The GLO-USDT pool shed 8,079 USDT. Both figures confirmed via Etherscan at time of reporting.

What the Community Clocked

SecureAI on X put it plainly: the exploit was not the contract itself. It was the reward mechanism design. Audits tend to look at code logic. They rarely stress-test economic incentive paths the way an attacker will.

Chinese-language crypto account aegixe_cn on X called it another incentive abuse attack and warned users to understand a protocol’s mechanics before putting money in. That kind of reminder lands differently when $200K has already left the pool. DeFi exploits have been stacking up this year, with May alone seeing multiple liquidity-layer incidents across Ethereum.

No oracle manipulation. No reentrancy. Just a minting function handing out tokens to anyone who showed up with a fresh address. The attack kept going as long as new addresses kept qualifying. And they did, part of a pattern that has cost DeFi nearly $770M in 2026. Per the filings.

The post WUSD.fi Sybil Farming Attack Drains $200K from GLOVE Pools appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
WSPN Logo
WSPN Price(WUSD)
$0,9979
$0,9979$0,9979
+%0,28
USD
WSPN (WUSD) Live Price Chart

AI Strategy: Powered 24/7

AI Strategy: Powered 24/7AI Strategy: Powered 24/7

Generate automated strategies using natural language

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

No Chart Skills? Still Profit

No Chart Skills? Still ProfitNo Chart Skills? Still Profit

Copy top traders in 3s with auto trading!