The Justice Department's No. 3 official briefly admitted on X that the agency was moving to revive a controversial fund to compensate Jan. 6 defendants — then deletedThe Justice Department's No. 3 official briefly admitted on X that the agency was moving to revive a controversial fund to compensate Jan. 6 defendants — then deleted

DOJ caught deleting bombshell admission on Jan. 6 slush fund revival

2026/06/03 21:20
2 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The Justice Department's No. 3 official briefly admitted on X that the agency was moving to revive a controversial fund to compensate Jan. 6 defendants — then deleted the post on Wednesday.

Associate Attorney General Stanley E. Woodward, Jr. responded to a post from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) with a terse three-word reply — "We're on it." — before quietly scrubbing it. Politico's Josh Gerstein flagged the deletion.

DOJ caught deleting bombshell admission on Jan. 6 slush fund revival

The admission came just hours after Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies that the DOJ's $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" was finished — permanently. "Look, we're not moving forward with the fund. Period," Blanche told the panel. Asked by Rep. Grace Meng (D-NY) if that meant never, Blanche said: "Correct."

Graham had proposed threading the needle on the dead fund. While acknowledging Blanche's announcement, he argued that "there are many victims of the weaponized Biden Justice Department" and proposed routing claims through the existing Federal Tort Claims Act process instead of creating a new system.

Critics in both parties had hammered the fund as a "slush fund" — a nearly $1.8 billion pot of taxpayer money with no judicial review, no congressional oversight, and commissioners the president could fire at will. A federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia had already temporarily blocked it.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, called it a "racket" designed to funnel taxpayer dollars to "insurrectionists, rioters, and white supremacists." Even roughly half of Senate Republicans were unhappy with the fund, according to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX).

Woodward's deleted post raises fresh questions about whether the administration intends to pursue Graham's workaround — and whether Blanche's "period" means what he said it did.

Predict & Trade to Win Rewards

Predict & Trade to Win RewardsPredict & Trade to Win Rewards

Guaranteed rewards with $500,000 prize pool

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

RealStocks Now Live

RealStocks Now LiveRealStocks Now Live

Trade real U.S. stock via regulated brokerage