The post Stocks survive PCE and consumer data – FOMC too? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. S&P 500 took a dive 75min before the opening bell, retail enthusiastically bought into PCE and UoM data release, and prices then settled little changed on the pre-flush level. What‘s apparent from checking the hourly on both ES and NDX this week? A series of higher highs and higher lows – remarkable resilience in a week that started with BTC selloff early Monday. Friday was a bad day for crypto too, yet Nasdaq held considerably better once again. Mag 7 stocks are acting less uniform as a group, and the yearly winners (NVDA and earlier discussed GOOGL) clearly show up – I would highlight further discussed banking sectors too. With the traditional Santa Claus rally expectation, we must ask whether there is sufficient breadth in the market to support such a feat – and whether Powell next week giving us a widely expected hawkish cut, will be enough for stocks to go on… look at ORCL and AVGO earnings too. Friday‘s dynamic to highlight is the poor data expectation, so readily bought, and when the data came, they weren‘t nearly enough that bad to sink the 500-strong index. Look also at retailers‘ performance, check out also DG, and UoM data – with leading indicators for services being better than for manufacturing, that tells us as much as there is to say about that recession risk… or for the „contagion“ of rising Japanese yields that were unable to sink Nikkei, let alone stocks around the world… nuff said. Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/stocks-survive-pce-and-consumer-data-fomc-too-202512071617The post Stocks survive PCE and consumer data – FOMC too? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. S&P 500 took a dive 75min before the opening bell, retail enthusiastically bought into PCE and UoM data release, and prices then settled little changed on the pre-flush level. What‘s apparent from checking the hourly on both ES and NDX this week? A series of higher highs and higher lows – remarkable resilience in a week that started with BTC selloff early Monday. Friday was a bad day for crypto too, yet Nasdaq held considerably better once again. Mag 7 stocks are acting less uniform as a group, and the yearly winners (NVDA and earlier discussed GOOGL) clearly show up – I would highlight further discussed banking sectors too. With the traditional Santa Claus rally expectation, we must ask whether there is sufficient breadth in the market to support such a feat – and whether Powell next week giving us a widely expected hawkish cut, will be enough for stocks to go on… look at ORCL and AVGO earnings too. Friday‘s dynamic to highlight is the poor data expectation, so readily bought, and when the data came, they weren‘t nearly enough that bad to sink the 500-strong index. Look also at retailers‘ performance, check out also DG, and UoM data – with leading indicators for services being better than for manufacturing, that tells us as much as there is to say about that recession risk… or for the „contagion“ of rising Japanese yields that were unable to sink Nikkei, let alone stocks around the world… nuff said. Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/stocks-survive-pce-and-consumer-data-fomc-too-202512071617

Stocks survive PCE and consumer data – FOMC too?

2025/12/08 00:58

S&P 500 took a dive 75min before the opening bell, retail enthusiastically bought into PCE and UoM data release, and prices then settled little changed on the pre-flush level. What‘s apparent from checking the hourly on both ES and NDX this week? A series of higher highs and higher lows – remarkable resilience in a week that started with BTC selloff early Monday.

Friday was a bad day for crypto too, yet Nasdaq held considerably better once again. Mag 7 stocks are acting less uniform as a group, and the yearly winners (NVDA and earlier discussed GOOGL) clearly show up – I would highlight further discussed banking sectors too.

With the traditional Santa Claus rally expectation, we must ask whether there is sufficient breadth in the market to support such a feat – and whether Powell next week giving us a widely expected hawkish cut, will be enough for stocks to go on… look at ORCL and AVGO earnings too.

Friday‘s dynamic to highlight is the poor data expectation, so readily bought, and when the data came, they weren‘t nearly enough that bad to sink the 500-strong index.

Look also at retailers‘ performance, check out also DG, and UoM data – with leading indicators for services being better than for manufacturing, that tells us as much as there is to say about that recession risk… or for the „contagion“ of rising Japanese yields that were unable to sink Nikkei, let alone stocks around the world… nuff said.

Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/stocks-survive-pce-and-consumer-data-fomc-too-202512071617

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

The post OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has confirmed that nine major U.S. banks engaged in debanking practices from 2020 to 2023, restricting access for digital asset firms and other sectors. This marks the first official acknowledgment of these policies, which limited services based on customer types, affecting crypto businesses significantly. OCC report highlights inappropriate distinctions by banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, targeting crypto and high-risk sectors. Nine banks reviewed showed similar policies restricting customer access without objective risk assessments. Impacted industries include digital asset firms, with potential referrals to the Attorney General for unlawful practices. Discover how major U.S. banks’ debanking policies hit crypto firms hard, per OCC’s 2025 report. Learn the implications for digital assets and what regulators are doing next—stay informed on banking risks today! What Are the OCC’s Findings on Banks Debanking Crypto Firms? Banks debanking crypto firms involves major financial institutions limiting or denying services to digital asset businesses based on perceived risks, as detailed in a recent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) report. From 2020 to 2023, nine of the largest U.S. banks implemented policies that required escalated reviews or outright restrictions for certain customers, including those in the crypto sector. This practice, now publicly confirmed, underscores ongoing tensions between traditional banking and emerging digital asset industries. How Did These Debanking Practices Affect Digital Asset Companies? The OCC’s six-page report, released on Wednesday, revealed that institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp, Capital One, PNC Financial Services Group, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal made distinctions among customers that were deemed inappropriate. For digital asset firms, this meant heightened scrutiny or complete denial of banking services, hindering operations in an already volatile market. The regulator noted that these policies spanned…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 11:01