TLDR ZachXBT accused InfoFi platforms of encouraging AI bots to flood feeds with low-quality content. Platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe are criticized for undermining community discussion with spam. ZachXBT offered bounties to scrape user data from InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps and Xeet. Critics claim InfoFi systems reward engagement farming, draining authenticity from platforms. [...] The post ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR ZachXBT accused InfoFi platforms of encouraging AI bots to flood feeds with low-quality content. Platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe are criticized for undermining community discussion with spam. ZachXBT offered bounties to scrape user data from InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps and Xeet. Critics claim InfoFi systems reward engagement farming, draining authenticity from platforms. [...] The post ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content appeared first on CoinCentral.

ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content

2025/12/09 02:21

TLDR

  • ZachXBT accused InfoFi platforms of encouraging AI bots to flood feeds with low-quality content.
  • Platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe are criticized for undermining community discussion with spam.
  • ZachXBT offered bounties to scrape user data from InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps and Xeet.
  • Critics claim InfoFi systems reward engagement farming, draining authenticity from platforms.

ZachXBT has sharply criticized major InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps, Galxe, and Layer3 for fueling a rise in AI-driven spam and low-quality content. He claims these platforms, by incentivizing engagement farming, are polluting the ecosystem and undermining genuine discussions. ZachXBT’s critique has sparked a wider debate on the consequences of automated content flooding, with many users calling for reforms to restore authenticity to these platforms.

ZachXBT Criticizes AI-Driven Spam in InfoFi Platforms

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has raised concerns about the growing problem of AI-generated spam in the InfoFi space. In recent social media posts, he targeted several prominent platforms such as Kaito Yaps, Galxe, Layer3, Cookie, and Wallchain. According to ZachXBT, these platforms encourage AI bots to flood feeds with low-value interactions, resulting in what he describes as “ecosystem pollution.”

He pointed out that many of these platforms incentivize users to engage in repetitive, low-quality activity to earn rewards. This, he argues, leads to a flood of AI-generated content that undermines meaningful discussion and harms the credibility of the ecosystem. “All the meta has done is boost AI slop and low-quality content while pretending it brought sticky users to the project,” he wrote in a response to a promotion for Kaito Yaps in July.

AI Bots Overrun Platforms Like Kaito Yaps and Galxe

InfoFi platforms, such as Kaito Yaps and Galxe, have faced scrutiny for their use of AI models to incentivize user engagement. These platforms reward users with tokens for activities like market commentary, predictions, and social media posts. However, critics argue that these reward structures have encouraged the rise of automated bots designed to produce high volumes of low-quality content.

The issue is exacerbated by the engagement-driven systems that prioritize quantity over the quality of user contributions. ZachXBT criticized these platforms for promoting a “game the system” mentality, where bots and coordinated groups flood feeds to maximize rewards. He believes this undermines genuine user interactions and weakens the integrity of discussions.

ZachXBT Launches Bounty for Data Scraping

To bring attention to the issue, ZachXBT has initiated a bounty program. He is offering cash rewards for individuals who can successfully scrape user data from the platforms in question. The aim is to gather data that can expose the scale of AI-driven activity across platforms like Kaito Yaps, Wallchain, Galxe, and Layer3.

On his Telegram channel, ZachXBT posted a bounty of $5,000 for the first person who could compile data sets from the specified platforms. He urged people to collect any available information, including usernames, user IDs, and on-chain addresses. His efforts highlight the growing frustration within the crypto community with the increasing prevalence of automated, low-value content.

Community Pushback Against Engagement Farming

The growing criticism of InfoFi platforms is not limited to ZachXBT. Many users within the crypto community have voiced their frustration with the engagement farming tactics seen on platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe. Some argue that the incentive structures reward users for posting content that adds little value to the discussion.

“Instead of experts, we have an army of mercenaries. Instead of discussions, we have ‘Reply Guys’ on steroids,” said Azel, a community commentator. Many users feel that these platforms have shifted their focus from genuine conversation to artificial metrics that prioritize engagement over substance.

In response to these concerns, some platforms have begun exploring ways to improve the quality of content by reducing the influence of AI bots. Despite these efforts, the ongoing challenge of balancing user engagement with content quality remains a significant issue for the InfoFi space.

The post ZachXBT Criticizes InfoFi Platforms for AI Spam and Low-Quality Content appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Deploys Scorpion Strike Force Drones – But Do They Have Warheads?

U.S. Deploys Scorpion Strike Force Drones – But Do They Have Warheads?

The post U.S. Deploys Scorpion Strike Force Drones – But Do They Have Warheads? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LUCAS one way attack drone (with inert warhead) at Yuma Proving Ground U.S. Army Last week United Stated Central Command (CENTCOM) announced Task Force Scorpion Strike (TFSS), and that a squadron had already been formed, “the U.S. military’s first one-way-attack drone squadron,” based in the Middle East. The release includes images of the unit’s Low-cost Unmanned Combat Attack System (LUCAS) drones, reverse-engineered from Shaheds used by Iran and Russia. The announcement comes just four months after Pete Hegseth ordered an acceleration of the acquisition and fielding of affordable drone technology. The location in Iran’s back yard is hardly coincidental. Previously the U.S. could only launch small numbers of expensive legacy missiles. Now Scorpion Strike can unleash the sort of massive drone barrages that Russia regularly launches and “flip the script on Iran” as one U.S. official puts it. Or can it? Other information suggests LUCAS is far from ready for action. *Warhead Not Included? The U.S. Army also issued a press release last week, describing the testing of LUCAS at the Yuma Proving Ground (YPG). The image with the release shows a craft which looks identical to those displayed by CENTCOM. Scorpion Strike’s LUCAS drones CENTCOM YPG includes over 2,000 miles of restricted airspace in the desert, making it the ideal place to test long range systems. But there is no testing with live weapons yet. “We’re getting our baby steps in before we conduct safety certification testing,” states Col. Nicholas Law, Director of Experimentation in the Office of the Under Secretary of War for Research & Engineering, in the release. But it seems the warheads for the drones have not been made. “The warhead that will eventually be integrated into LUCAS isn’t constructed yet, but it will also be low-cost and mass produced by multiple manufacturers. Evaluators are currently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/09 19:03