TLDR Cardano’s Charles Hoskinson claims the quantum threat to blockchain is overstated today. Quantum-proof blockchain technology exists but comes with significant performance costs. The industry will need standardized guidance before migrating to quantum-secure systems. Hoskinson expects meaningful quantum pressure on blockchain in the 2030s. Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, has addressed concerns over the [...] The post Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Says Quantum Threat to Crypto is Overhyped appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Cardano’s Charles Hoskinson claims the quantum threat to blockchain is overstated today. Quantum-proof blockchain technology exists but comes with significant performance costs. The industry will need standardized guidance before migrating to quantum-secure systems. Hoskinson expects meaningful quantum pressure on blockchain in the 2030s. Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, has addressed concerns over the [...] The post Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Says Quantum Threat to Crypto is Overhyped appeared first on CoinCentral.

Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Says Quantum Threat to Crypto is Overhyped

2025/12/09 06:24

TLDR

  • Cardano’s Charles Hoskinson claims the quantum threat to blockchain is overstated today.
  • Quantum-proof blockchain technology exists but comes with significant performance costs.
  • The industry will need standardized guidance before migrating to quantum-secure systems.
  • Hoskinson expects meaningful quantum pressure on blockchain in the 2030s.

Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, has addressed concerns over the impact of quantum computing on blockchain technology. He asserts that the threat posed by quantum computing to cryptocurrencies is currently overstated and not an immediate risk. In a recent podcast discussion, Hoskinson referred to the quantum threat as a “big red herring,” emphasizing that while quantum-resistant cryptography exists, its adoption would come at a significant cost in terms of both speed and expense.

Hoskinson’s remarks were aimed at easing fears in the blockchain industry about an impending quantum disruption. He made it clear that although quantum-secure protocols are available, the trade-offs in performance—about ten times slower and more expensive—make their adoption unappealing for most networks. As blockchain networks strive for high transaction throughput, such a drastic reduction in speed would not be acceptable, he pointed out.

The Need for Standardization in Quantum-Secure Cryptography

One of the core issues Hoskinson highlighted is the lack of standardized quantum-secure cryptographic protocols. He stressed that the blockchain industry should wait for standardized guidance, which is being developed by organizations like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). NIST’s post-quantum cryptography program, including standards FIPS 203–206, is aimed at ensuring that quantum-resistant algorithms are not only secure but also efficient.

According to Hoskinson, the lack of standardization presents a risk for blockchain developers. Without these standards, networks may adopt quantum-resistant protocols that are inefficient or unsupported in the future. He explained that choosing non-standard solutions could result in performance penalties, making blockchain networks slower and more costly to run. Until NIST finalizes the standards and hardware vendors begin aligning with them, blockchain networks will likely avoid premature quantum-proof upgrades.

The Quantum Threat Timeline and DARPA’s Role

While many researchers believe quantum computing could disrupt blockchain security, Hoskinson and other experts agree that this threat is still some years away. He pointed to DARPA’s Quantum Blockchain Initiative (QBI) as a key reference for understanding the timeline for quantum computing advancements. The initiative, which is exploring the scalability of practical quantum computers, suggests that real concerns for quantum blockchain security are unlikely to arise before the 2030s.

Hoskinson cited the QBI’s evaluation of 11 companies working on quantum computing and stated that the military, in particular, needs to know when it will be necessary to upgrade its cryptographic systems. The work being done by DARPA, he noted, serves as the clearest benchmark for understanding when quantum computers capable of breaking current encryption might be available at scale.

When Will Blockchains Need to Migrate to Quantum-Resistant Systems?

While the quantum threat is real, Hoskinson’s message is clear: blockchain networks do not need to rush into migration. The pressure to adopt quantum-secure systems will increase gradually, with most experts predicting that meaningful migration could begin in the 2030s.

 The focus for blockchain developers, according to Hoskinson, should be on ensuring that systems are both efficient and aligned with evolving hardware accelerations for quantum-resistant cryptography.

Currently, the cost, latency, and lack of ecosystem alignment prevent widespread adoption of quantum-resistant protocols in the blockchain space. Despite the slow pace of adoption, Hoskinson reassured listeners that the technology is already being tested and developed, with NIST-approved hardware and algorithms paving the way for a future transition when the quantum threat becomes more tangible.

The post Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Says Quantum Threat to Crypto is Overhyped appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

The post OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has confirmed that nine major U.S. banks engaged in debanking practices from 2020 to 2023, restricting access for digital asset firms and other sectors. This marks the first official acknowledgment of these policies, which limited services based on customer types, affecting crypto businesses significantly. OCC report highlights inappropriate distinctions by banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, targeting crypto and high-risk sectors. Nine banks reviewed showed similar policies restricting customer access without objective risk assessments. Impacted industries include digital asset firms, with potential referrals to the Attorney General for unlawful practices. Discover how major U.S. banks’ debanking policies hit crypto firms hard, per OCC’s 2025 report. Learn the implications for digital assets and what regulators are doing next—stay informed on banking risks today! What Are the OCC’s Findings on Banks Debanking Crypto Firms? Banks debanking crypto firms involves major financial institutions limiting or denying services to digital asset businesses based on perceived risks, as detailed in a recent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) report. From 2020 to 2023, nine of the largest U.S. banks implemented policies that required escalated reviews or outright restrictions for certain customers, including those in the crypto sector. This practice, now publicly confirmed, underscores ongoing tensions between traditional banking and emerging digital asset industries. How Did These Debanking Practices Affect Digital Asset Companies? The OCC’s six-page report, released on Wednesday, revealed that institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp, Capital One, PNC Financial Services Group, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal made distinctions among customers that were deemed inappropriate. For digital asset firms, this meant heightened scrutiny or complete denial of banking services, hindering operations in an already volatile market. The regulator noted that these policies spanned…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 11:01