Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail. A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply. In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic. This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI. True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy. Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party. DeAI's Trilemma Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework. Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently. Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui. This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently. Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail. A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply. In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic. This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI. True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy. Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party. DeAI's Trilemma Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework. Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently. Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui. This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently. Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.

The true holy grail of DeAI: Talus's "full-chain" solution

2025/12/09 08:00

Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail.

A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply.

In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic.

This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI.

True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain

Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy.

Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party.

DeAI's Trilemma

Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework.

Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently.

Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui.

This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently.

Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

The post OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has confirmed that nine major U.S. banks engaged in debanking practices from 2020 to 2023, restricting access for digital asset firms and other sectors. This marks the first official acknowledgment of these policies, which limited services based on customer types, affecting crypto businesses significantly. OCC report highlights inappropriate distinctions by banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, targeting crypto and high-risk sectors. Nine banks reviewed showed similar policies restricting customer access without objective risk assessments. Impacted industries include digital asset firms, with potential referrals to the Attorney General for unlawful practices. Discover how major U.S. banks’ debanking policies hit crypto firms hard, per OCC’s 2025 report. Learn the implications for digital assets and what regulators are doing next—stay informed on banking risks today! What Are the OCC’s Findings on Banks Debanking Crypto Firms? Banks debanking crypto firms involves major financial institutions limiting or denying services to digital asset businesses based on perceived risks, as detailed in a recent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) report. From 2020 to 2023, nine of the largest U.S. banks implemented policies that required escalated reviews or outright restrictions for certain customers, including those in the crypto sector. This practice, now publicly confirmed, underscores ongoing tensions between traditional banking and emerging digital asset industries. How Did These Debanking Practices Affect Digital Asset Companies? The OCC’s six-page report, released on Wednesday, revealed that institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp, Capital One, PNC Financial Services Group, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal made distinctions among customers that were deemed inappropriate. For digital asset firms, this meant heightened scrutiny or complete denial of banking services, hindering operations in an already volatile market. The regulator noted that these policies spanned…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 11:01