The post Fact Check: Are Netflix and MetaMask Teaming Up for ETH Subscriptions? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Netflix is one of the world’s largest streaming platforms and is often at the center of tech-related rumors. Now, a new claim is spreading across X and Web3 communities that Netflix is in talks with MetaMask to allow Ethereum-based subscription payments. The rumor gained huge attention, so Coinpedia stepped in to fact-check whether the claim …The post Fact Check: Are Netflix and MetaMask Teaming Up for ETH Subscriptions? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Netflix is one of the world’s largest streaming platforms and is often at the center of tech-related rumors. Now, a new claim is spreading across X and Web3 communities that Netflix is in talks with MetaMask to allow Ethereum-based subscription payments. The rumor gained huge attention, so Coinpedia stepped in to fact-check whether the claim …

Fact Check: Are Netflix and MetaMask Teaming Up for ETH Subscriptions?

2025/12/09 18:43
Netflix crypto payment rumor

The post Fact Check: Are Netflix and MetaMask Teaming Up for ETH Subscriptions? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Netflix is one of the world’s largest streaming platforms and is often at the center of tech-related rumors. Now, a new claim is spreading across X and Web3 communities that Netflix is in talks with MetaMask to allow Ethereum-based subscription payments.

The rumor gained huge attention, so Coinpedia stepped in to fact-check whether the claim is real or just another false alarm.

Who Made This Claim?

The claim appears to have originated from social media posts on X  from crypto-focused accounts like Coinvo, CryptoNews_eth, and PandaAsiaStreet, all citing vague “reports” that Netflix is exploring Ethereum payments through MetaMask wallets.

But is this claim true? Let’s break it down.

Coinpedia’s Key Findings: What’s Actually True?

No Official Confirmation From Netflix or MetaMask

Coinpedia’s review of Netflix’s press pages, and there hasn’t been any public statement or announcement confirming talks or partnerships related to Ethereum subscriptions.

However, such genuine partnerships involving major brands are always disclosed by both parties.

No Evidence in Netflix’s Payment Roadmap

Netflix currently supports traditional payment methods, including credit cards, debit cards, and region-specific options.

There is no mention of crypto payments, Ethereum, or MetaMask in Netflix’s official payment documentation or investor communications.

MetaMask Has Not Announced Any Netflix Collaboration

MetaMask usually announces big partnerships publicly, but there is no mention of Netflix anywhere, not on its website, blog, or official X account. 

While MetaMask has recently partnered with firms like Meld for fiat on-ramps and Bridge for stablecoins, none of these relate to Netflix or any streaming service. The project’s focus remains on wallet features, staking, and rewards programs, not entertainment partnerships.

Industry Experts Urge Caution

Crypto analysts warn that viral claims about big-brand crypto integrations often lack verification. Without confirmation from primary sources, such rumors should be treated as speculation.

Similar claims involving Amazon, Apple, and other tech giants in the past were later proven false.

Summary Table: Coinpedia’s Evidence Against the Theory

Claim Made by TheoryCoinpedia’s Counter-Evidence
Netflix in talks with MetaMaskNo official statement from either company
MetaMask partnership confirmedNo mention on MetaMask’s official channels
Social media leaks prove talksSpeculation only, no verifiable sources

Conclusion

ClaimIs Netflix in talks with MetaMask to integrate Ethereum-based subscriptions
Verdict❌ False
Fact-Check by CoinpediaAs per Coinpedia research and a review of official sources, there is no credible or verifiable evidence that Netflix is in talks with MetaMask or planning Ethereum-based subscription payments.Until then this claim remains unverified and speculative.
Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31