A qualitative study of instructors shows that multiscale design analytics provide new pedagogical insights, aid exploration and interpretation of AI-generated measures, strengthen assessment and feedback, and support student self-reflection.A qualitative study of instructors shows that multiscale design analytics provide new pedagogical insights, aid exploration and interpretation of AI-generated measures, strengthen assessment and feedback, and support student self-reflection.

Visual Analytics Transform How Teachers Understand Structure in Student Designs

2025/12/09 17:00

Abstract and 1. Introduction

  1. Prior Work and 2.1 Educational Objectives of Learning Activities

    2.2 Multiscale Design

    2.3 Assessing Creative Visual Design

    2.4 Learning Analytics and Dashboards

  2. Research Artifact/Probe

    3.1 Multiscale Design Environment

    3.2 Integrating a Design Analytics Dashboard with the Multiscale Design Environment

  3. Methodology and Context

    4.1 Course Contexts

    4.2 Instructor interviews

  4. Findings

    5.1 Gaining Insights and Informing Pedagogical Action

    5.2 Support for Exploration, Understanding, and Validation of Analytics

    5.3 Using Analytics for Assessment and Feedback

    5.4 Analytics as a Potential Source of Self-Reflection for Students

  5. Discussion + Implications: Contextualizing: Analytics to Support Design Education

    6.1 Indexicality: Demonstrating Design Analytics by Linking to Instances

    6.2 Supporting Assessment and Feedback in Design Courses through Multiscale Design Analytics

    6.3 Limitations of Multiscale Design Analytics

  6. Conclusion and References

A. Interview Questions

\

5 FINDINGS

We present findings from our grounded theory qualitative analysis of instructor interviews, regarding their experiences with the research artifact / probe. We developed four categories through the analysis of interview data, which illustrate (1) analytics providing insights and informing pedagogical action, (2) support for exploration, understanding, and validation of analytics, (3) use of analytics for assessment and feedback, and (4) analytics supporting students’ self-reflection.

5.1 Gaining Insights and Informing Pedagogical Action

Instructors in our study reported that multiscale design analytics provide them with novel and useful insights. I6 compared the experience with learning management systems, such as Canvas and Blackboard. According to I6, the scale and cluster analytics offer unique insights, which they have not encountered on any other system. According to I1 and I5, the scale and cluster analytics help them understand students’ progress on their design projects. I2 finds the analytics particularly useful in understanding how students have developed and presented structure in their design.

\ I1: I think using the dashboard and using the analytics is really helpful for me to kind of get an understanding of what [students are] doing.

\ I2: I’ve been thinking like, you know, [scales and clusters] could be a very useful information for me, you know in terms of how students develop structure and present that structure at different levels.

\ We find initial evidence for the value of insights—provided by multiscale design analytics—as a basis for pedagogical intervention [50, 68]. I9 expressed that these analytics can help them find out whether students are able to effectively use the multiscale design environment, and take action, adjusting the curriculum, as needed.

\ I9: If there are multiple scales and clusters…they are at least using the environment efficiently. So if this number is extremely low for everybody…then maybe you need to [give] a tutorial on [the design environment].

5.2 Support for Exploration, Understanding, and Validation of Analytics

Aiding comprehensibility is an important challenge to address in developing user interfaces for AI-based technologies [67]. AI-based multiscale design analytics represent complex characteristics of students’ design work. Instructors found that our dashboard design helps them explore and understand multiscale design analytics. In particular, instructors expressed that the links on the dashboard, in conjunction with visual annotations about how the algorithm operated on design instances, help them explore and understand the relationships between analytics and the scales and clusters they represent. I1 and I5 further expressed desire to navigate to specific scales and clusters within a design.

\ I1: I’m really enjoying these links that I can kind of click on it…with the scales or clusters like they can take me to those. I was wondering…whether it would be possible to…maybe like pinpoint or just kind of go to the precise scale.

\ I9: I was able to infer…there is one zoom level that has a particular region…and then they have a different zoom level that focuses on a different region and so on.

\ Linking the analytics with design assemblages that they measure supported instructors in giving feedback to validate and refine what is measured. As instructors were able to inspect specific regions represented by analytics, they expressed where AI has a mismatch with their interpretation.

\ I3: “I’m not sure why [it shows here] two different ones…you’ve got a couple [extra] clusters.”

\ I1, I3, I4, and I9 derived assistance in understanding the analytics through our dashboard’s visual annotation of the designs, which concretely represent the analytics through an animation of scales and clusters. The animation—which presents clusters present at each scale one by one—helped instructors understand how design elements form spatial clusters across scales. As I1 expressed*, “I think I now have a better understanding of spatial clusters [with] the animation of colors changing”.*

\ \

:::info Authors:

(1) Ajit Jain, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: Audigent;

(2) Andruid Kerne, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: University of Illinois Chicago;

(3) Nic Lupfer, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: Mapware;

(4) Gabriel Britain, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: Microsoft;

(5) Aaron Perrine, Texas A&M University, USA;

(6) Yoonsuck Choe, Texas A&M University, USA;

(7) John Keyser, Texas A&M University, USA;

(8) Ruihong Huang, Texas A&M University, USA;

(9) Jinsil Seo, Texas A&M University, USA;

(10) Annie Sungkajun, Illinois State University, USA;

(11) Robert Lightfoot, Texas A&M University, USA;

(12) Timothy McGuire, Texas A&M University, USA.

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

:::

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

a16z Opens First Asia Office: Park From Naver and Monad to Lead

a16z Opens First Asia Office: Park From Naver and Monad to Lead

The post a16z Opens First Asia Office: Park From Naver and Monad to Lead appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. a16z crypto, the crypto-focused venture arm of Andreessen Horowitz, has officially entered the Asian market with the opening of its first regional office in Seoul, South Korea. The Silicon Valley-based venture fund appointed Sungmo Park as Head of APAC go-to-market to lead the Seoul operations. Park brings extensive regional expertise from his previous roles at Monad Foundation and Polygon Labs. Sponsored Sponsored Asia Emerges as Global Crypto Powerhouse Chief Operating Officer Anthony Albanese made the announcement. The decision to establish a physical presence in Asia reflects the region’s growing dominance in global crypto adoption. Chainalysis reports that Asia-Pacific accounted for $2.36 trillion in on-chain value over the 12 months to June 2025. This figure represents a 69% increase from $1.4 trillion in the previous year. South Korea stands as the world’s second-largest crypto market, with nearly one in three adults holding digital assets—a rate that surpasses stock ownership. Japan has seen on-chain activity surge 120% over the past year. Singapore has one of the highest crypto ownership rates in the world. About 40% of Gen Z and Millennials in the country invest in digital assets. India leads the Chainalysis Global Crypto Adoption Index, driven by mobile-first technology adoption and limited access to traditional banking. Notably, 11 of the top 20 countries in Chainalysis’s Global Crypto Adoption Index are located in Asia. Excited to announce that @a16zcrypto is expanding into Asia and opening our first office in Seoul, South Korea. As part of this, we’re thrilled to have @sungmo_apac16z join our team as Head of APAC go-to-market to lead the Seoul office and start building our presence in the… pic.twitter.com/KBljioBCqx — Anthony Albanese (@AAlbaneseNY) December 10, 2025 The Seoul launch follows other leading venture and crypto firms boosting their Asian presence. Competition for deals, talent, and growth is intensifying as the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 10:34