The post Strategy Challenges MSCI Over Bitcoin Treasury Exclusion Plan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy has taken a firm position against MSCI’s proposal to remove digital asset treasury companies from its Global Investable Market Indexes. Strategy said the change would hurt investors, disrupt markets, and conflict with national digital asset policy. Strategy Challenges MSCI’s Digital Asset Threshold Proposal The firm submitted a detailed response urging MSCI to withdraw the plan. The company stressed that the proposal relied on a mistaken view of how Bitcoin treasury firms operate. It further warned that the 50% digital asset ratio is arbitrary and has zero positive effect. The letter highlights that Strategy is of the opinion that MSCI misunderstands companies that are holding massive Bitcoin reserves. The company claimed that digital asset treasuries are not investment funds but companies. This stance aligns with the recent statements made by Michael Saylor confirming once again that Strategy has a long-term commitment to Bitcoin. The letter said that Bitcoin is not passively accumulated by the company but supports product development and other operational activities of the company. Strategy further explained that its treasury business is like traditional financial systems which banks and insurance companies use. Another point that the company emphasized was that it is still in the software and analytics business as well as an active management style. Does MSCI’s Rule Threaten Crypto Market Stability? Strategy cautioned that the threshold suggested by MSCI would result in unstable index movements. It said digital asset prices move quickly and could push firms in and out of the index. The company added that the rule would create confusion because different accounting standards treat digital assets differently. It said the approach would result in unfair outcomes across global markets. Strategy believes this would break MSCI’s promise of neutral and consistent index construction. It further claimed that this would provide a bad precedent in policy-based… The post Strategy Challenges MSCI Over Bitcoin Treasury Exclusion Plan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy has taken a firm position against MSCI’s proposal to remove digital asset treasury companies from its Global Investable Market Indexes. Strategy said the change would hurt investors, disrupt markets, and conflict with national digital asset policy. Strategy Challenges MSCI’s Digital Asset Threshold Proposal The firm submitted a detailed response urging MSCI to withdraw the plan. The company stressed that the proposal relied on a mistaken view of how Bitcoin treasury firms operate. It further warned that the 50% digital asset ratio is arbitrary and has zero positive effect. The letter highlights that Strategy is of the opinion that MSCI misunderstands companies that are holding massive Bitcoin reserves. The company claimed that digital asset treasuries are not investment funds but companies. This stance aligns with the recent statements made by Michael Saylor confirming once again that Strategy has a long-term commitment to Bitcoin. The letter said that Bitcoin is not passively accumulated by the company but supports product development and other operational activities of the company. Strategy further explained that its treasury business is like traditional financial systems which banks and insurance companies use. Another point that the company emphasized was that it is still in the software and analytics business as well as an active management style. Does MSCI’s Rule Threaten Crypto Market Stability? Strategy cautioned that the threshold suggested by MSCI would result in unstable index movements. It said digital asset prices move quickly and could push firms in and out of the index. The company added that the rule would create confusion because different accounting standards treat digital assets differently. It said the approach would result in unfair outcomes across global markets. Strategy believes this would break MSCI’s promise of neutral and consistent index construction. It further claimed that this would provide a bad precedent in policy-based…

Strategy Challenges MSCI Over Bitcoin Treasury Exclusion Plan

2025/12/11 02:41

Strategy has taken a firm position against MSCI’s proposal to remove digital asset treasury companies from its Global Investable Market Indexes. Strategy said the change would hurt investors, disrupt markets, and conflict with national digital asset policy.

Strategy Challenges MSCI’s Digital Asset Threshold Proposal

The firm submitted a detailed response urging MSCI to withdraw the plan. The company stressed that the proposal relied on a mistaken view of how Bitcoin treasury firms operate.

It further warned that the 50% digital asset ratio is arbitrary and has zero positive effect. The letter highlights that Strategy is of the opinion that MSCI misunderstands companies that are holding massive Bitcoin reserves.

The company claimed that digital asset treasuries are not investment funds but companies. This stance aligns with the recent statements made by Michael Saylor confirming once again that Strategy has a long-term commitment to Bitcoin.

The letter said that Bitcoin is not passively accumulated by the company but supports product development and other operational activities of the company. Strategy further explained that its treasury business is like traditional financial systems which banks and insurance companies use. Another point that the company emphasized was that it is still in the software and analytics business as well as an active management style.

Does MSCI’s Rule Threaten Crypto Market Stability?

Strategy cautioned that the threshold suggested by MSCI would result in unstable index movements. It said digital asset prices move quickly and could push firms in and out of the index.

The company added that the rule would create confusion because different accounting standards treat digital assets differently. It said the approach would result in unfair outcomes across global markets.

Strategy believes this would break MSCI’s promise of neutral and consistent index construction. It further claimed that this would provide a bad precedent in policy-based exclusions. Still, negotiations between MSCI and MicroStrategy continues ahead of a January 15th review deadline.

According to the letter, the MSCI proposal is also against the current administration’s drive for digital asset development. Strategy mentioned that the initiatives of federal authorities is to encourage the use of Bitcoin and encourage the development and use of crypto assets.

Will MSCI Allow Markets to Decide DATs’ Value?

Strategy urged MSCI to let markets determine the value of digital asset treasury (DATs) companies. It said history shows that early technology leaders often face skepticism before driving major economic change.

The firm asked MSCI to maintain a neutral role and avoid shaping policy through index rules. It also asked MSCI to extend the consultation if concerns remain. Strategy said the best path forward is a deeper review that reflects the rapid evolution of digital asset technologies.

Source: https://coingape.com/strategy-challenges-msci-over-bitcoin-treasury-exclusion-plan/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

The post Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor and a group of crypto executives met in Washington, D.C. yesterday to push for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (the BITCOIN Act), which would see the U.S. acquire up to 1M $BTC over five years. With Bitcoin being positioned yet again as a cornerstone of national monetary policy, many investors are turning their eyes to projects that lean into this narrative – altcoins, meme coins, and presales that could ride on the same wave. Read on for three of the best crypto projects that seem especially well‐suited to benefit from this macro shift:  Bitcoin Hyper, Best Wallet Token, and Remittix. These projects stand out for having a strong use case and high adoption potential, especially given the push for a U.S. Bitcoin reserve.   Why the Bitcoin Reserve Bill Matters for Crypto Markets The strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill could mark a turning point for the U.S. approach to digital assets. The proposal would see America build a long-term Bitcoin reserve by acquiring up to one million $BTC over five years. To make this happen, lawmakers are exploring creative funding methods such as revaluing old gold certificates. The plan also leans on confiscated Bitcoin already held by the government, worth an estimated $15–20B. This isn’t just a headline for policy wonks. It signals that Bitcoin is moving from the margins into the core of financial strategy. Industry figures like Michael Saylor, Senator Cynthia Lummis, and Marathon Digital’s Fred Thiel are all backing the bill. They see Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a hedge against systemic risks. For the wider crypto market, this opens the door for projects tied to Bitcoin and the infrastructure that supports it. 1. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) – Turning Bitcoin Into More Than Just Digital Gold The U.S. may soon treat Bitcoin as…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:27