The post State Street, Galaxy Introduce SWEEP Fund appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News State Street Investment Management and Galaxy Digital are launching the State Street Galaxy Onchain Liquidity Sweep Fund (SWEEP) on Solana in early 2026, targeting institutional cash management needs. The private tokenized fund will let Qualified Purchasers move money in and out using PYUSD, PayPal’s regulated stablecoin issued by Paxos, enabling near 24/7 liquidity instead of …The post State Street, Galaxy Introduce SWEEP Fund appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News State Street Investment Management and Galaxy Digital are launching the State Street Galaxy Onchain Liquidity Sweep Fund (SWEEP) on Solana in early 2026, targeting institutional cash management needs. The private tokenized fund will let Qualified Purchasers move money in and out using PYUSD, PayPal’s regulated stablecoin issued by Paxos, enabling near 24/7 liquidity instead of …

State Street, Galaxy Introduce SWEEP Fund

2025/12/11 14:33
State Street, Galaxy Introduce SWEEP Fund

The post State Street, Galaxy Introduce SWEEP Fund appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

State Street Investment Management and Galaxy Digital are launching the State Street Galaxy Onchain Liquidity Sweep Fund (SWEEP) on Solana in early 2026, targeting institutional cash management needs. The private tokenized fund will let Qualified Purchasers move money in and out using PYUSD, PayPal’s regulated stablecoin issued by Paxos, enabling near 24/7 liquidity instead of traditional market hours. Ondo Finance will seed the strategy with around $200 million, signaling growing demand for tokenized money market-style products.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Vitalik Buterin Suggests Ethereum Security Intact Amid Recent Glitch

Vitalik Buterin Suggests Ethereum Security Intact Amid Recent Glitch

The post Vitalik Buterin Suggests Ethereum Security Intact Amid Recent Glitch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum remains secure despite a recent network glitch caused by a Prysm client bug that temporarily halted block finalization. Vitalik Buterin emphasized that this does not undermine the network’s core security, as blocks continue to be produced and executed, behaving like Bitcoin’s probabilistic model during such pauses. Vitalik Buterin assures that temporary loss of finality does not compromise Ethereum’s overall security model. The glitch primarily impacted secondary systems like bridges and Layer 2 solutions, not the base chain. Experts compare Ethereum’s response to Bitcoin’s, where probabilistic finality prevents chain rewrites while allowing continued operations. Ethereum secure despite recent glitch: Vitalik Buterin explains why the network’s resilience shines through temporary finality pauses. Discover key insights on blockchain reliability. Stay informed on crypto updates—read more now. What Did Vitalik Buterin Say About Ethereum’s Security After the Recent Glitch? Ethereum remains secure even amid the recent network disruption, according to Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum’s co-founder. He clarified that the Prysm client bug, which briefly interrupted block finalization, does not pose a threat to the protocol’s integrity. Instead, it highlights the network’s design for graceful degradation, where core functions persist without deterministic certainty. How Does Ethereum Behave During Finality Pauses? During the incident, Ethereum temporarily shifted to a probabilistic security model similar to Bitcoin’s, as noted by blockchain researchers. Fabrizio Romano Genovese, an Oxford PhD and Ethereum protocol specialist, explained that many blockchains, including Bitcoin, rely on growing difficulty in rewriting history rather than instant finality. In Ethereum’s case, blocks kept being created and executed, preventing any chain halt, though secondary services like cross-chain bridges experienced delays. This behavior underscores the network’s robustness, with no risk of approving incorrect transaction histories. Genovese added that such events reveal the need for better fallback mechanisms in dependent infrastructure, ensuring smoother operations in future occurrences. Statistics from the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 16:40