FATHER AND SON. Ilocos Norte 1st district Representative Ferdinand Alexander Marcos takes his oath of office in Malacañang in June 2022 before his father, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.FATHER AND SON. Ilocos Norte 1st district Representative Ferdinand Alexander Marcos takes his oath of office in Malacañang in June 2022 before his father, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.

Anti-dynasty bill from Bojie Dy, Sandro Marcos is weak, but a start

2025/12/11 16:48

Speaker Bojie Dy and the President’s son, Majority Leader Sandro Marcos, jointly filed a bill prohibiting political dynasties on Wednesday, December 10, officially kickstarting the House majority’s bid to pass a measure that — on surface level — goes against their political interests.

It came after President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. “instructed” Congress to approve a piece of legislation defining dynasties.

The five-page proposal, excluding the explanatory note, defines a dynasty as the “concentration and dominance of elective political power by persons related to one another.”

It describes a political dynasty relationship as an existing family connection between an incumbent elected official and anyone related to them up to the fourth degree of consanguinity or affinity.

This includes not only a politician’s spouse, parents, children, and siblings, but also grandparents, grandchildren, aunts, uncles, nephews, nieces, cousins, in-laws, and great-grand relatives.

Banning this kind of political dynasty relationship — on paper — appears to be a nightmare for lawmakers, many of whom are dynasts themselves.

Dy and Congressman Marcos’ proposal, however, has some interesting caveats:

  • It does not prohibit cross-level or cross-jurisdiction dynasties.
  • It does not prohibit a dynast from immediately succeeding an incumbent relative in the next election.
  • It is silent on party-list abuse by dynasts.
Must Read

Why did the dynastic Marcos change his mind about the anti-dynasty bill? 

Prohibition only on government level or territorial jurisdiction

The bill specifies what political dynasty relationship is not allowed. It bars relatives:

  • of national elective officials from holding other national elective posts
  • from running for the same congressional office in a legislative district at the same time
  • of provincial elective officials from holding other elective posts in the same provincial government
  • of municipal or city elective officials from holding other elective posts in the same municipal or city government
  • of barangay elective officials from holding other elective posts in the same barangay

In short, the prohibition is based on territory or government level.

How does this affect our current dynasties? Using the Marcoses as an example, these people can hold the same posts at the same time:

  • a Marcos can hold one national position (president, vice president, or senator)
  • another Marcos can hold one provincial position (governor, vice governor, or provincial board member)
  • Marcoses can hold as many legislative district seats as possible
  • Marcoses can hold as many city or municipal seats as possible as long as there is only one official per locality

Dy, who declared 16 relatives in government, is not extremely affected by his proposal, since his other brothers represent separate legislative districts in Isabela, while his son and daughter-in-law are also mayors but of different localities.

Rotation allowed

The bill also does not seek to address the longstanding ill of successive dynasties.

The problem in the Philippines is that when a politician is constitutionally barred from seeking a fourth term, his relative runs for office to succeed him.

It’s the kind of political strategy that allowed the Ynareses of Rizal to stay in power in the capitol for 33 years, or the Dimacuhas of Batangas City for 37 years.

There are 11 anti-dynasty bills filed in the 20th Congress. The versions filed by Makabayan and Akbayan include provisions that explicitly prohibit immediate succession.

Silent on party-list hijacking

The bill is also unable to address the hijacking done by political dynasties in the party-list system. The provisions in Dy and Marcos’ bill will not prohibit a dynast from accepting a party-list nomination while his relatives are holding congressional office.

Watchdog Kontra Daya has said that 40 out of 156 party-list groups that ran in the 2025 elections have links to dynasties.

It is important to note that this is how former speaker Martin Romualdez was able to expand his grip on power in the House — it has been a family affair for him. While he represents Leyte’s first district, his wife Yedda and son Andrew Julian are representatives of Tingog Party List. Yedda’s uncle Raymond Mendoza is also a congressman representing TUCP or the Trade Union Congress of the Philippines.

It is understandable, however, why Dy and Marcos filed a mild anti-dynasty proposal, whether or not they have a genuine interest to actively push for this reform.

Congress, composed of political families who have perpetuated themselves in power for decades and have no desire of slowing down, have been allergic to any anti-dynasty proposal, despite the Constitution saying that their political existence is prohibited. A stronger bill will face massive pushback, so House leaders will try to aim for a middle ground.

There is still merit in this bill. For one, it prevents future joint bids (governor and vice governor) for the capitol, such as the Bersamins of Abra, the Pinedas of Pampanga, and the Singsons of Ilocos Sur.

But even if an anti-political dynasty hurdles the House of Representatives, it will face rough sailing in the Senate, where one-third of lawmakers — the Tulfos, Cayetanos, Villars, Estrada-Ejercito — are siblings.

It will always be a herculean task despite a nudge from the President, whose approval numbers continue to decline. — Rappler.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures

CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures

The post CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group will offer options based on the derivative markets on Solana (SOL) and XRP. The new markets will open on October 13, after regulatory approval.  CME Group will expand its crypto products with options on the futures markets of Solana (SOL) and XRP. The futures market will start on October 13, after regulatory review and approval.  The options will allow the trading of MicroSol, XRP, and MicroXRP futures, with expiry dates available every business day, monthly, and quarterly. The new products will be added to the existing BTC and ETH options markets. ‘The launch of these options contracts builds on the significant growth and increasing liquidity we have seen across our suite of Solana and XRP futures,’ said Giovanni Vicioso, CME Group Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products. The options contracts will have two main sizes, tracking the futures contracts. The new market will be suitable for sophisticated institutional traders, as well as active individual traders. The addition of options markets singles out XRP and SOL as liquid enough to offer the potential to bet on a market direction.  The options on futures arrive a few months after the launch of SOL futures. Both SOL and XRP had peak volumes in August, though XRP activity has slowed down in September. XRP and SOL options to tap both institutions and active traders Crypto options are one of the indicators of market attitudes, with XRP and SOL receiving a new way to gauge sentiment. The contracts will be supported by the Cumberland team.  ‘As one of the biggest liquidity providers in the ecosystem, the Cumberland team is excited to support CME Group’s continued expansion of crypto offerings,’ said Roman Makarov, Head of Cumberland Options Trading at DRW. ‘The launch of options on Solana and XRP futures is the latest example of the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:56